Jump to content

User talk:Kinu/Archive 9: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Paulo Alho: new section
→‎George Tan Yang: new section
Line 179: Line 179:


You tagged this article for BLP prod, but I've declined it — only rather recent articles are subject to the BLP prod process, and this article has been around for four years. If you want to use a normal prod, that's still a valid option; if you do so, I'll not remove it. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 00:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
You tagged this article for BLP prod, but I've declined it — only rather recent articles are subject to the BLP prod process, and this article has been around for four years. If you want to use a normal prod, that's still a valid option; if you do so, I'll not remove it. [[User:Nyttend|Nyttend]] ([[User talk:Nyttend|talk]]) 00:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

== George Tan Yang ==

Hello sir. I would like to ask why the Wikipedia entry on Mr. George Tan Yang was deleted despite the fact that it was backed by numerous references and articles and the man is recognized as an important businessman in the Philippines. As founder of McDonald's Philippines, he opened the doors to McDonald's entering these shores 30 years ago.

He has also given back to society through various corporate social responsibility efforts while being recognized by two institutions that he earned accolades from: both San Beda College and De La Salle University.

Finally, I find it disturbing that Mr. Yang's entry was deleted while a corporate rival of his, Mr. Tony Tan Caktiong, remains online.

As a Wikipedia contributor in past years, this does not sit well with me and I hope you can address it.

Revision as of 09:48, 9 September 2010

Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page. Please use headlines when starting new talk topics. Thank you.


Gökhan Özen
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I would like to create a Gökhan Özen entry but dont exactly understand why the original was deleted. Can you elaborate please? --Imdeca (talk) 06:58, 24 May 2010 (UTC)

Neglected Mario Characters
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

As a contributor to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neglected Mario Characters, you may be interested to know I have renominated this article for deletion. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Neglected Mario Characters (2nd nomination). Robofish (talk) 15:22, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

ACT for TV
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi Kinu, I am going to try and write ACT for TV's Wikipedia page in a brief and encyclopedic way. I have been told to contact you first before I did this because you deleted the last version about 2 months ago.

Regards Actfortv (talk) 11:05, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Oriya Wikipedia
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi, we are wondering if there is any chance you could come help us on the Oriya Wikipedia. It is currently very undeveloped and would be well-served by anybody else who knows Oriya, even the creation of several small articles is appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 149.169.85.57 (talk) 23:13, 3 August 2010 (UTC)

  • I will be happy to contribute as my time and abilities permit. My ability to write it is not as strong as my ability to read and speak it (the lack of an international keyboard notwithstanding), but I'm glad to help as I can! --Kinu t/c 23:03, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
Randy Glassman
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Can you unprotect Rodney Glassman, now that he's won the primary election to become the Democratic Senate candidate in Arizona? -LtNOWIS (talk) 07:00, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Chad Sauerwein
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Chad deserves it. THANKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigasolus (talkcontribs) 02:31, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

  • The article had no information about how the subject meets notability guidelines. This is an encyclopedia, not a place to give props to people you think "deserve" it. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 02:32, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Creative professionals #1, And for the "reliable source" I listed 4 under "External Links". THANKS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigasolus (talkcontribs) 02:42, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
    • No, you provided a link to classmates.com, two links to press releases, and one link about Chad of Mercia that has nothing to do with your subject. He exists, but he isn't notable. Look, you created this article twice; two different editors tagged this article for speedy deletion, and two others (myself included) agreed and performed the actual deletion. I'm sorry, but I don't think this subject is an appropriate topic for a Wikipedia article. Thanks. --Kinu t/c 02:45, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • You can ask many of his students, and will tell you he is very talented and is "notable" —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gigasolus (talkcontribs) 02:48, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
    • My students tell me the same thing, but I don't deserve an article about myself on Wikipedia. I provided you with information about what Wikipedia considers encyclopedic notability; I would suggest taking the time to read it, familiarizing yourself with policies/guidelines a bit more through editing, etc. As for this article, I think my rationale is rather clear, and I consider this discussion closed. Happy editing! --Kinu t/c 02:51, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Pricearea
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

WTF were you thinking RERE, you deleted by famed artiel on Pricearea. Chrislk02 Chris Kreider 06:29, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Jean-Baptiste Louis Frédéric de La Rochefoucauld de Roye
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I missed it at first, but it is directly taken from the France article with little translation. It mostly in French. Jean-Baptiste Louis Frédéric de La Rochefoucauld de Roye Do you suggest a translation request? Cindamuse (talk) 07:10, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

  • I don't think a straight translation request is necessary... I would agree that it's probably been created by running the original fr.wikipedia article through a translator and copied here, but it seems relatively coherent. It might be all right just to slap some cleanup tags on there since it could just use some basic copy editing for grammar, etc., to bring it up to par. --Kinu t/c 07:14, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • The middle of the article is completely in French, seriously not coherent. I missed it at first as well. No harm; no foul. I'm gonna go ahead and request translation. Cindamuse (talk) 07:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
  • Ha... oh yes, now I see it. Well, all right, for the most part it's coherent. :) Yeah, might as well put in that translation request then. --Kinu t/c 07:22, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
Clyde Michael Bandy
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I'm not sure what the proper action is in this case. User talk:Steffy1106 keeps removing tags and recreating an article once deleted. There is a clear copyright infringement and unsourced BLP. I just noticed that you deleted it a few hours ago and it's back up again same as before. She's relentless. There are so many tags on her talk page that my head is spinning. Can you offer some direction? Thanks. Cindamuse (talk) 08:18, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

  • I think you handled it the best you could. Seeing as how they stopped, I think they got the hint, but if they hadn't, I definitely would've reported it to WP:AIV (after the appropriate warnings, of course). And trust me, creating the article twice and removing the CSD template a few times is hardly relentless... I've seen new editors who've removed CSD templates dozens of times, retaliate on my talk page, recreate the article five or six times before it being salted... it's part of the fun, I guess? :) --Kinu t/c 18:56, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
User:Philcha/Sandbox/Writing for the Web/Sources
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Please recreate User:Philcha/Sandbox/Writing for the Web/Sources so that I can copy the content to another page. I will then have User:Philcha/Sandbox/Writing for the Web/Sources deleted. --Philcha (talk) 23:27, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Kinu, is there a problem? User:Philcha/Sandbox/Writing for the Web/Sources still shows as a red link for me. --Philcha (talk) 23:57, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Oops! When I restored it I neglected to remove the speedy tag, so another administrator came along and deleted it shortly thereafter. I've restored it again and remembered to take the speedy tag off this time. :) Thanks for your patience! --Kinu t/c 23:59, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hello. I setup the wiki page for Sincera today. And you tagged it for speedy deletion. Can you explain why you did this? I manage the founder of the company Mr. Carl Diebold


Bogey99 (talk) 01:48, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Id like to recreate the article today. I have permission from the author of the website to use the info/images. I understand the conflict of interest. However, all information is factual and not being altered in any way from that of the website. Is this ok?

Bogey99 (talk) 16:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

  • There is no evidence that the content can be released for use on Wikipedia other than your word, which is not good enough. Likewise, it appears that your intention is to create articles about your clients, which is a blatant conflict of interest and constitutes use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Therefore, I say recreation of this article is wholly inappropriate. --Kinu t/c 17:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Kinu

I just signed on to my account and noticed that you tagged the Rutledge Nash & Associates page for deletion. Please explain why this is? The article is not a form of spam or advertisement. Its simply biographical information about the company. How can we amend this issue?

Thanks

Bogey99 (talk) 19:06, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

  • You say above that you manage Carl Diebold, and this company is a management firm that lists Carl Diebold as its client. This is a relatively cut-and-dry case of conflict of interest. For what it's worth, your edit history seems to indicate that all of the articles you have worked on are companies, people, etc., with which you have a strong connection, hence the appearance of promotion. This is highly discouraged. That notwithstanding, the article does not show why the company is notable, and none of the sources provided even mention the company, as indicated in the template at the top of the article. There need to be reliable sources showing why this company is notable. --Kinu t/c 19:23, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi, I tagged this article for speedy deletion, but I believe I was wrong, could you please restore? It's not as spammy as it initially looks, in my opinion. Thanks, Fingerz 17:22, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

You just deleted Adan Perez, please also take a look at Adan Carlos Perez, which I just trimmed to almost nothing due to WP:GRAPEVINE. Best regards, TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 18:08, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Thanks for the heads up. It looks like this editor's sole purpose is inserting this BLP-violating information in various articles with no sources whatsoever. I'll keep an eye out for any other issues. --Kinu t/c 18:18, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

You might want to look at this AFD, the author dug up some sources. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Otters want attention) 21:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

live vision macro management
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

I added information for this page and you deleted it why is that? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Cocofresh777 (talkcontribs) 07:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Randy Sosin
This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hi I created a page for Randy Sosin and Executive Producer and Senior VP at MTV, and it was deleted. Looking at the tag on it, it seems to have a problem with the Imdb link that I added to show that Randy Sosin is an executive producer and has proof of projects he has worked on. Please let me know what I need to do to get this page back up and running. thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lrolfo (talkcontribs) 21:00, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hello. You deleted Executive Perils because it was not note worthy enough. I contend the fact they the company wrote one of the first cyber liability insurance policies (which is now one of the fastest growing lines of insurance), and the "shadow" policy created for SWA and AIG makes the organization at least worthy of an entry. The article was simple, objective and stayed away from anything that could be considered advertising. I kindly ask you to reconsider your decision. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mdmagnuson (talkcontribs) 23:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

This discussion has been archived and should not be modified. To comment, please create a new topic at the bottom of my current talk page by clicking here.

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Inappropriate AfD closure. Thank you. Armbrust Talk Contribs 13:19, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Deletion review for Pet Smart

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Pet Smart. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Armbrust Talk Contribs 17:05, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Deeper Life Bible Church

I have removed the prod tag you placed on Deeper Life Bible Church, as the article was at AfD on 2 May 2007. Compliance with procedure is the only reason I removed the tag; I have no opinion on the merits of its deletion, and I have no prejudice towards opening another AfD. —KuyaBriBriTalk 21:03, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

User:Cindamuse made a decent case toward her having the fanbase that meets WP:ENT, but we also have the problem that proving the fanbase is difficult... as fan clubs themselves are never seen as WP:RS, and one has to then find an RS that at least mentions the fanbase. A major problem is that the wording of WP:ENT actually encourages OR, in that it speaks toward fan base and cult following without actually setting criteria for determination of such. Sigh. What I propose[1][2] is that we agree to a temporary merge and redirect to List of One Life to Live cast members as long as we can spin her back out if/when she wins an award or gets another notable gig. Reasonable compromise? Schmidt, MICHAEL Q. 23:51, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

Institute for Information Transmission Problems

Hello Kinu,

I was creating English version of the ru:Институт проблем передачи информации им. А. А. Харкевича РАН, Institute for Information Transmission Problems when I have been interrupted by CorenBot. all I have put is the infobox, and basic information, about a 100 words. The text I included is a bowdlerized copy of the the first paragraph from the 'about' page of the institute. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AbduArbache (talkcontribs) 07:46, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

  • You essentially answered your own question... it was tagged as a copyright violation because the text was copied from the Institute's site. (Indeed, it was every other sentence, give or take, and a few words were changed here and there, but the majority of the text was essentially the same, which is still a copyright problem, hence why the bot tagged it). Speedy deletion criterion G12 applied in this case. You are welcome to create an article using the Institute's site as a source of information, but not as a source of the text itself. I hope this information helps. --Kinu t/c 07:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
  • So how can I include this text ?

"The Institute for information transmission problems of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Kharkevich Institute) was established in December 29, 1961 by decree No.1144 of the Presidium of the USSR Academy of Sciences. By the same decree, Academician A.A. Kharkevich was nominated director of the Institute."
source —Preceding unsigned comment added by AbduArbache (talkcontribs) 14:56, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Reference desk vandal

Hi. I wanted to let you know that the vandal in WP:RD/math is most definitely not RDBury. He has a habit of editing users' comments and forging signatures, so make sure to look at edit histories when dealing with him. See also this. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 15:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

  • Gotcha, thanks for letting me know. Looks like a common problem, but I've never run into him. I'll keep an eye out in the future, though. --Kinu t/c 17:22, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Deleted Page

Hi Kinu,

I'm new to posting on wiki, and this is the only way I could find to contact you.

You recently deleted an article I had written on Alex Rusinko Shihan. It was deleted for a suspected G12 violation (it was not a copyright violation), as well as because the article didn't state the significance of the person. The entire article is about the significance of the person, being the first occidental to develop a new American style of Aikido.

Please give me some pointers on what I need to do to get this article re-published.

Thanks! Hirikiaikido (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Nik

Juara turtle project

hallo i'm new user and try start to write article about Juara turtle project, what make me surprise wow you more faster that robot, please check that site before you start block or make that article as spam or remove it and again please. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Farid Zenon (talkcontribs) 02:25, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

  • The reasons mentioned on your talk page adequately discuss why the other editor tagged the article as a speedy deletion candidate, and why I endorsed it/deleted the article. Thank you for your praise of my efficiency. --Kinu t/c 02:44, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Response to your query

Responding to the query you left on my talk page, no, I did not make this edit. Is it possible to delete it seeing as it is being made under a false identity? I'd ask for sanctions on the account but since it's anonymous I don't think it would have much effect.--RDBury (talk) 07:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

See this. -- Meni Rosenfeld (talk) 08:09, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Thanks, it's nice to see people are keeping on top of this kind of thing.--RDBury (talk) 16:10, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

The Dagons wikipedia page

Hello,

I am new to writing wikipedia articles. My first article was tagged for speedy deletion. After rewriting numerous versions I think my article conforms to Wikipedia standards. I have several questions though - one, is it possible to give too many references? 2, How to I get my article to post so that it can be re evaluated? 3, Are all the versions I've done going to be viewable forever? It seems sloppy because to me these were only drafts - but maybe I should not have pushed save -- ? Is there a way of deleting these multiple, similar versions now? Thanks very much Rizmagnusson (talk) 19:24, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Paulo Alho

You tagged this article for BLP prod, but I've declined it — only rather recent articles are subject to the BLP prod process, and this article has been around for four years. If you want to use a normal prod, that's still a valid option; if you do so, I'll not remove it. Nyttend (talk) 00:42, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

George Tan Yang

Hello sir. I would like to ask why the Wikipedia entry on Mr. George Tan Yang was deleted despite the fact that it was backed by numerous references and articles and the man is recognized as an important businessman in the Philippines. As founder of McDonald's Philippines, he opened the doors to McDonald's entering these shores 30 years ago.

He has also given back to society through various corporate social responsibility efforts while being recognized by two institutions that he earned accolades from: both San Beda College and De La Salle University.

Finally, I find it disturbing that Mr. Yang's entry was deleted while a corporate rival of his, Mr. Tony Tan Caktiong, remains online.

As a Wikipedia contributor in past years, this does not sit well with me and I hope you can address it.