Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Animal Farm characters: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:47, 16 October 2010

List of Animal Farm characters

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a cut and paste copy of the various individual articles already in existence about Animal Farm characters. The main article already has a brief synopsis of each character with a link to an article with an expanded description, which this new article has cut and copied all into one place. Not sure how this doesn't run afoul of WP:CSD#A10, but the reviewing admin said A10 doesn't apply, so we'll try this avenue. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 11:03, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ Redirect per the info provided below by nominator. ~~No need for a list -- the main article already has one. And this is a word-for-word duplication of other articles-- a classic CSD A10.~~ Jimmy Pitt talk 14:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I should point out that on 30 July 2010, a similar article was redirected to the Animal Farm article. I would recommend the same outcome here. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 14:55, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant content fork created as a copyright violation of existing articles. Colonel Warden (talk) 00:52, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - There are a a crapload of individual character pages up for deletion above. I'm okay with deleting those if this is kept; or with keeping those if this is deleted. This is an extremely major allegorical book and some sort of provision for expanded character coverage is fully appropriate. Carrite (talk) 02:58, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Anonymax (talk · contribs) nominated all of the individual articles after creating this list and finding that the list was nominated. I believe the individual articels, which existed before Anonymax unilaterally decided to merge them all into a single article, should be kept to preserve their edit histories. Since the main article contains links to the individual articles, all of the information is easily findable by interested readers. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and adjust the content with the "main" transclusion and Keep the individual articles too. We need lists and we need articles. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 08:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per this statement and as article creator. Anonymax (talk) 15:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 : '''Comment''' {{user|Anonymax}} nominated all of the individual articles after creating this list and finding that the list was nominated.  I believe the individual articels, which existed before Anonymax unilaterally decided to merge them all into a single article, should be kept to preserve their edit histories.  Since the main article contains links to the individual articles, all of the information is easily findable by interested readers. <font color="green">[[User:WikiDan61|WikiDan61]]</font><font color="green" size="5px"></font><sup>[[User talk:WikiDan61|ChatMe!]]</sup><sub>[[Special:Contributions/WikiDan61|ReadMe!!]]</sub> 13:07, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
 *'''Keep''' and adjust the content with the "main" transclusion and Keep the individual articles too. We need lists and we need articles. --[[User:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )]] ([[User talk:Richard Arthur Norton (1958- )|talk]]) 08:24, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
+:'''Keep''' per this statement and as article creator. [[User:Anonymax|Anonymax]] ([[User talk:Anonymax|talk]]) 15:47, 16 October 2010 (UTC)