Jump to content

User talk:UnqstnableTruth: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
EdwardsBot (talk | contribs)
354,693 edits
Line 482: Line 482:
:::::::Please talk to Deskana. I am growing quite impatient in my conversation with him. Its not that I'm mad at him or anything, I just don't understand him at all. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]] <big><sup>[[User talk:Feedback|'''☎''']]</sup></big></span> 21:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
:::::::Please talk to Deskana. I am growing quite impatient in my conversation with him. Its not that I'm mad at him or anything, I just don't understand him at all. <span style="text-shadow:grey 0.1em 0.1em 0.2em; class=texhtml">[[User:Feedback|<big><font color="#039">'''''Feed'''''</big>]][[Special:Contributions/Feedback|<big><font color="#008000">'''''back'''''</big>]] <big><sup>[[User talk:Feedback|'''☎''']]</sup></big></span> 21:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
::::::::I'm afraid that talking to me won't change anything; because the Hornetman16 account has not edited for so long, the checkuser data simply isn't there. --[[User talk:Deskana|(ʞɿɐʇ)]] [[User:Deskana| ɐuɐʞsǝp]] 09:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
::::::::I'm afraid that talking to me won't change anything; because the Hornetman16 account has not edited for so long, the checkuser data simply isn't there. --[[User talk:Deskana|(ʞɿɐʇ)]] [[User:Deskana| ɐuɐʞsǝp]] 09:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
{{outdent}}
I'm going to withdraw my previous allegation of socking, or at least, as it relates to Kalajan. I don't believe they are the same person at this time; merely another inexperienced editor who needs to learn to listen to those around him. [[user:Hazardous Matt|Hazardous Matt]] ([[user_talk:Hazardous Matt|talk]]) 21:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)


== If you don't notice it sooner ==
== If you don't notice it sooner ==

Revision as of 21:29, 30 November 2010

What the Hell

Why the hell are you retiring? With you gone there is no one as sane and at the sametime insane as me on wikipeia for me to talk to. Now all I have is Nici and Thinkblue. Come back!!!!! *cries in corner* What or Who has caused you to retire? Note: I'm not on my computer, no IM available.--WillC 22:54, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, there are other things that I need to take care of. Particularly something that involves a 3-rope 20-by-20ft ring. --UnquestionableTruth-- 23:15, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You wrestle in a three corner ring, how strange. TNA might steal that idea just remember to keep it quite. Okay. I hope you return one day. There needs to be some sane people on here than just a handful when I return full time.--WillC 23:19, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Uhh... A standard wrestling ring uses 3 long ropes hung using 12 turnbuckles with 3 in each corner. The ropes are then joined at a single corner. We don't use 4 ropes in rasslin' Hehe... Thanks anyway.--UnquestionableTruth-- 23:23, 8 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Me=idiot. I wasn't thinking sorry.--WillC 03:47, 12 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You sad sad man.--WillC 02:03, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well at least I have an FLC and that I am not a slow ass soldier.--WillC 02:32, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow a great accomplishment, you got to ride a jeep, run like a pussy, shoot a blank gun with a group of other wannabies. So proud, wow so very very proud. You should meet Obama for that amazing act.--WillC 02:44, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Bum bum, bum bum bum da dum. THE GREASTEST FUCKING FILM.--WillC 03:01, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You sad pathetic soul. Get on MSN if we are going to do this. We actually have a subject now.--WillC 03:05, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It is something.--WillC 03:17, 26 August 2009 (UTC) Okay.--WillC 03:58, 26 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Got something to say about my editing, go here.--WillC 10:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Messenger

Yeah I still have it. I am usually not logged on though unless someone contacts me and asks to log on. TJ Spyke 01:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Get online so it will be me, Aaron, and you. Hopefully this time we won't end weird.--WillC---Joe's gonna kill you!!!) 03:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Huh? 0.o?--UnquestionableTruth-- 04:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Get on I.M. now!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!--WillC 06:42, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's Nice

To See Someone Settle An Issue In A Reasonable Manner. Thanks. KP McZiggy (Allow Me To Introduce Myself...) 06:05, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. --UnquestionableTruth-- 06:48, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Slam Champion

According to the WWE Encyclopedia (specifically Shawn Michaels' article) a Grand Slam Champion is someone who has won the WWE Championship, the Intercontinental Championship, the European Championship, and the WWE Tag Team Championship. It doesn't specify in the Encyclopedia what a Triple Crown winner is, but it has always been my understanding that it was WWE, Intercontinental, and Tag Team championships. I would assume (but have no evidence) that, now days, any combination of one of the world titles along with either the Intercontinental OR United States Championship and either of the tag titles, but I that's just speculation on my part. Wwehurricane1 (talk) 23:48, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Possible Sockpuppet

Since you deal with this a lot and I don't know how to deal with it, I thought I might just pass along this [1], and tell you its possible this user is a Sock Puppet considering he's only editing on Talk Pages, might be worth a look into. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 22:50, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No I have no clue on this earth who it is, but its extremely suspicious how a new user targets discussions involving spoilers and only spoilers right off the bat of creating a new account. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 23:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, well I thought I'd just pass it along, it might be worth a check to looking through the contribution history of Survivor Series (2009) of the editors in there, since I have a funny feeling this all arose over the Big Show vs Undertaker editing the other day. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 23:42, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
just throwing this out there, I'm not looking to accuse anyone, but this dude [2] might be worth a look into. Afro Talkie Talk - Afkatk 23:44, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


World Wrestling Association (Los Angeles)

I posted sources for that statements. One was even the official new WWA website. --AndreaFox2 (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't merged the two pages. You have preserved only the old one. In my old WWA version of the page there were more informations such as the title reign by toyonobori. --AndreaFox2 (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Re:TNA

Thanks for brakeing that down for me iCEMAN247 03:45, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

For what it's worth

Just thought I'd drop you a line and say that for the next month your WrestleMania logos image is gonna be my desktop image on my work computer. It looks as cool as it did last year. Tony2Times (talk) 16:21, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, UnqstnableTruth. You have new messages at Kuyabribri's talk page.
Message added 20:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

—KuyaBriBriTalk 20:46, 31 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of ANI discussion

I have reported Stan Simmons (talk · contribs) at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#User removing content without explanation and against_consensus, making personal attacks. You may wish to weigh in. Thanks. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:13, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I should also note that he has accused you of something pretty serious at User_talk:Turian. —KuyaBriBriTalk 20:22, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

IWEWrestlingKev (talk · contribs)

User is blocked as a sockpuppet of TWrestlingA09 (talk · contribs). I thought that pattern looked familiar. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:00, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think it's specifically related to the site you mentioned, because every article he created had "Kevin" appended, and all the content was either redlinked or linked to disambiguation pages. Through one of the pages -- I think it was the one where he listed his real name -- I searched Google and found him on myspace and facebook. The dude's 22 years old?! He has a little too much time on his hands, methinks. Also, thanks Gogo for taking care of it. Simon-in-sagamihara (talk) 06:03, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re your message: I wouldn't be surprised if there are more sockpuppets in the past and in the future. If you find the old sockpuppet, please tag it. If the account is not blocked, leave me a note and I'll block the account, too. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 06:11, 12 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Just an FYI, as I suspected, he came back. KevinsWrestlingWorld (talk · contribs) There isn't anythiing to see since everything has been deleted. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 17:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

RE

Yeah, it is strange.--WillC 01:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sock

I've reported it, Bullet. You may want to add anything to it if you wish. !! Justa Punk !! 22:32, 24 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

The Professional Wrestling Barnstar
For solving the edit war (at least for now) on the Eve Torres article, I award you this barnstar Zonafan39 (talk) 16:51, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Tag Team Championship

Yeah, I had a read of it earlier. I'm personally not bothered whether the new belt article is merged with the Raw belt article or kept separate, so I'll go with whatever the project decides. However, seeing as that it's now highly unlikely that the SmackDown belt article will ever be simply named WWE Tag Team Championship, I'm just simply fixing the 2002-2010 links now. -- Θakster  09:37, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well someone had to do it, hah. -- Θakster  09:42, 17 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Regarding User:The Cleanup Kid

FYI, User talk:The Cleanup Kid made the same edit to the Pontiac Silverdome that he was banned over a month or so ago. — X96lee15 (talk) 13:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 4 October 2010

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 07:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Signpost: 11 October 2010

Orphaned non-free image File:WrestleMania2000.jpg

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WrestleMania2000.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:59, 14 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 18 October 2010

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter

Delivered: 09:28, 25 October 2010 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

The Signpost: 25 October 2010

Need Help

Question, do you know how to use Cluebot III archive bot or any of the archive bots because my talk page says template: loop detected and I don't know how to fix it.--Nascarking 23:52, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 1 November 2010

Active

You're pretty active. Contributions almost every day. Why do you consider yourself semi-retired since March 2009? Feedback ☎ 17:31, 7 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]

The Signpost: 8 November 2010

I just saw this

Does that mean what I think it means or did I misunderstand? Feedback ☎ 22:03, 9 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Well, I wrote this on WT:PW the other day:

But I don't know, we're probably not referring to the same thing. Does "HM16" mean anything to you or am I off-track here? Feedback ☎ 09:51, 10 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]

Sorry to intrude. I've been lurking on WT:PW since I decided to step away from the project. I'm not familiar with HM, but the edits and attitudes send up different flags for me. Hazardous Matt (talk) 22:07, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kalajan? Hmm... Its possible. I remember Kalajan, but I have to research the old edit pages to be more familiar with the editor. All I know is that he isn't banned so he doesn't even have a reason to be sockpuppeting. Also, if he has stopped using any of his other accounts, then it counts as a Fresh Start instead of a Sockpupettry case and its perfectly allowed. However, as of this moment, I'm inclined to believe he could be Hornetman, who is a banned user, coming back against the community's wishes. Feedback ☎ 02:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I see that Kalajan/Deely returned the other day. He asked for an unblock request on WP:ANI. An admin asked someone to perform a CheckUser to see if he has had any sockpuppets during his indefinite block and the unblock achieved consensus before that ever happened. The editing patters are very similar. Even if we don't suspect Nascarking of being Deely, I think Deely needs a "check-up" with CheckUser to see if his previous sockpuppeting behavior has continued. Feedback ☎ 05:55, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I had a lot of one-on-one contact with Kalajan/Deely, trying to get him to straighten out. It's part of the reason I got burnt out on the project. Kalajan/Deely had a similar attitude to NK and claims to be of the same approximate age. I'll see if I can find any singificance between the two contribution-wise over the weekend. Also, I don't think we should overlook the third option, that this is just someone else with the same attitude. Hazardous Matt (talk) 14:18, 17 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Nascar has agreed to a CheckUser test on my talk page. All we need is someone who will administer it. Feedback ☎ 04:31, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Hmmm well then Deskana is the most thorough CheckUser you'll find. Thank you for keeping updated throughout this past week. --UnquestionableTruth-- 08:12, 18 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Please talk to Deskana. I am growing quite impatient in my conversation with him. Its not that I'm mad at him or anything, I just don't understand him at all. Feedback ☎ 21:57, 21 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I'm afraid that talking to me won't change anything; because the Hornetman16 account has not edited for so long, the checkuser data simply isn't there. --(ʞɿɐʇ) ɐuɐʞsǝp 09:26, 22 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm going to withdraw my previous allegation of socking, or at least, as it relates to Kalajan. I don't believe they are the same person at this time; merely another inexperienced editor who needs to learn to listen to those around him. Hazardous Matt (talk) 21:29, 30 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you don't notice it sooner

Nascarking has opened up a discussion regarding removal of content, although it seems somewhat of a farce. WT:PW. Afro (Talk) 00:15, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 November 2010

The Signpost: 22 November 2010

The Signpost: 29 November 2010

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:UnqstnableTruth&oldid=399798773"