User talk:Lawline

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests‎. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rehevkor ✉ 13:47, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

I also reverted your edit of the same section after receiving Rehevkor's warning above. Jonathanwallace (talk) 14:12, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

INDICATED ARTICLES REMOVED

You should not delete the discussion, you can request it is archived, but not deleted it. Consider this your second warning, continuing to vandalise as you have could result in you being blocked. Rehevkor ✉ 14:14, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

LIBELOUS AND SLANDEROUS COMMENTS REMOVED FROM THE POSTING

See Wikipedia:Libel It is Wikipedia policy to delete libelous material when it has been identified.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Rehevkor ✉ 14:27, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

ARTICLES DELETED AS NOT IMPORTANT, SO IRRELEVANT

Votermarch.org listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Votermarch.org. Since you had some involvement with the Votermarch.org redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). January ^(talk) 14:21, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

SUGGEST DELETING REFERENCE, NOT REDIRECTING WWW.VOTERMARCH.ORG IS A WEBSITE ALREADY See http://www.votermarch.org

Editing comments of other editors

Changing another editor's comments is never acceptable. You are welcome to civilly disagree (and you might want to cut the caps, in that vein, too), but you may not edit or remove them. You've received sufficient warnings for your disruptive behavior by this point. You need to either stop screaming and discuss, or leave until you can. If you can do neither, you will be helped to leave. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 14:59, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

SEE Wikipedia:Libel which requires that false and defamatory articles be eliminated immediately. If you continue to act in a reckless manor by reposting libelous comments, I would suggest that you contact the legal Counsel for Wikipedia

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action, as you did at WP:EAR. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 15:04, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved.

This user is asking that his block be reviewed:

Lawline (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

your reason here

You have violated my First Amendment Right of Free Speech. Per Wikipedia Policy, libelous content should be removed immediately. See Wikipedia:libel Under Wikipedia's policy on defamation is to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified. See also Wikipedia:legal threats

Lawline (talk) 15:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC)

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=your reason here You have violated my First Amendment Right of Free Speech. Per Wikipedia Policy, libelous content should be removed immediately. See [[Wikipedia:libel]] Under Wikipedia's policy on defamation is to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified. See also [[Wikipedia:legal threats]] [[User:Lawline|Lawline]] ([[User talk:Lawline#top|talk]]) 15:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC) |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here You have violated my First Amendment Right of Free Speech. Per Wikipedia Policy, libelous content should be removed immediately. See [[Wikipedia:libel]] Under Wikipedia's policy on defamation is to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified. See also [[Wikipedia:legal threats]] [[User:Lawline|Lawline]] ([[User talk:Lawline#top|talk]]) 15:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC) |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=your reason here You have violated my First Amendment Right of Free Speech. Per Wikipedia Policy, libelous content should be removed immediately. See [[Wikipedia:libel]] Under Wikipedia's policy on defamation is to immediately delete libelous material when it has been identified. See also [[Wikipedia:legal threats]] [[User:Lawline|Lawline]] ([[User talk:Lawline#top|talk]]) 15:10, 22 January 2011 (UTC) |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}