User talk:SpacemanSpiff: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 08:29, 30 March 2011

Due to RL needs, SpacemanSpiff is going to be off-wiki for a while. I'll try to check online every few days, but if there's any admin action of mine that needs change/reversion, any uninvolved admin can feel free to do so without waiting for a response from me.

Leave me a message.

Sinsen is back

His IP block expired sometime ago and he is now back - Konguproud (talk · contribs). Can you block him per WP:DUCK or should i open an SPI?--Sodabottle (talk) 07:27, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done, SPI might be helpful still owing to the large sock factory and output. cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 20:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Railway articles

Please delete Saroj Mail.There is no such train.Shyamsunder (talk) 22:23, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

and Pushkar Railway Network too. There does not exit such network or anything like that.Shyamsunder (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This one doesn't appear to be straightforward G3, although it may qualify as G5, let me check that. Meantime feel free to WP:PROD as a hoax. —SpacemanSpiff 18:23, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Block for sinsen's IP range

Our friend sinsen says just left me this message. Says he isn't going to stop now. Can you block the ranges 117.193.160.0/20 and 117.193.160.0/20 again?. --Sodabottle (talk) 16:31, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, I didn't do the range block earlier, TnXMan307 did it as there is some collateral damage to weigh (only CUs can check that). Can you check with him again? cheers. —SpacemanSpiff 16:37, 27 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of South Asian inventions and discoveries

The article/list in the heading is already being discussed in a requested move discussion and yet User:Mar4d has gone ahead to create the article which has no consensus at this point. Can you help delete List of South Asian inventions and discoveries per WP:GAME and WP:FAITACCOMPLI? Zuggernaut (talk) 03:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

V. P. Singh administration

Please stop adding random articles to this category. The category is meant for core topics; a President does not become part of a Prime Minister's administration etc etc; a former prime minister being investigated does not make him part of the new administration etc. —SpacemanSpiff 05:59, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly avoid imputing randomness to attempts to improve at least some parts of the wiki. Rajiv was leader of the opposition during VP's premiership, R. Venkataraman invited VP to form a minority coalition govt. in India (a first in Indian constitutional history), Babri and Ramajanmabhoomi issues split his supports and the issues still seem not to have died out, etc. All these are core topics. Karnan (talk) 14:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These are exactly that, random topics, so please stop this ridiculous over categorization. —SpacemanSpiff 15:12, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Karnan, adding coalition partners, opposition leaders and everyone connected to a prime minister makes a category unmaintainable. Think about what happens if this logic gets extended to other prime ministers. virtually all major indian politicians will end up in multiple "XYZ administration" categories. --Sodabottle (talk) 16:32, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 28 March 2011

News and notes: Berlin conference highlights relation between chapters and Foundation; annual report; brief news

In the news: Sue Gardner interviewed; Imperial College student society launched; Indian languages; brief news

WikiProject report: Linking with WikiProject Wikify

Features and admins: Featured list milestone

Arbitration report: New case opens; Monty Hall problem case closes – what does the decision tell us?

Technology report: UploadWizard release; code review – should MediaWiki move to Git?; brief news

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 01:47, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why reverting my edits?

Hi, why are you reverting my sourced edits on the Mughal Empire page, I have not implied or suggested anythign here I have just added facts with sources after full discussion, I will be reverting the edits after 24 hrs(3rr) coz i think the revert is not explained, plz explain what is wrong in these edits. HotWinters (talk) 08:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 08:28, 30 March 2011 edit HotWinters (talk \| contribs) 503 edits →‎Why reverting my edits?: new section ← Previous edit		Revision as of 08:29, 30 March 2011 edit undo HotWinters (talk \| contribs) 503 edits m →‎Why reverting my edits? Next edit →
Line 65:		Line 65:
	== Why reverting my edits? ==		== Why reverting my edits? ==

	Hi, why are you reverting my sourced edits on the [[Mughal Empire]] page, I have not implied or suggested anythign here I ~~ahve~~ just added facts with sources after full discussion, I will be reverting the edits after 24 hrs(3rr) coz i think the revert is not explained, plz explain what is wrong in these edits. [[User:HotWinters\|HotWinters]] ([[User talk:HotWinters\|talk]]) 08:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)		Hi, why are you reverting my sourced edits on the [[Mughal Empire]] page, I have not implied or suggested anythign here I have just added facts with sources after full discussion, I will be reverting the edits after 24 hrs(3rr) coz i think the revert is not explained, plz explain what is wrong in these edits. [[User:HotWinters\|HotWinters]] ([[User talk:HotWinters\|talk]]) 08:28, 30 March 2011 (UTC)