Talk:Jacob Hamblin: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 07:34, 25 April 2011

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Biography C‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Christianity: Latter Day Saints C‑class Low‑importance

	Christianity portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Latter Day Saints portal This article is supported by WikiProject Latter Day Saint movement (assessed as Low-importance).

United States: Old West Unassessed Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject American Old West.

NPOV

Under "Early Life", the sentence The man was a kind man and died in 1886 is blatantly opinionated. The date of death may be verifiable, but it is a value judgment whether or not he was really a kind man. Now, you may be able to provide a reference stating that he was considered by some, or even by many, to be a kind man. You may be able to establish the fact that this was a generally-held opinion of him, but you cannot take an opinion and try to present it as a fact. Dementia13 (talk) 19:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture

the "restored" picture appears to be a kim jong-il-level photomanipulation that leaves this dude looking like a pageant queen. i mean, if people think this heavily photoshopped version is better, by all means leave it, but i think it should probably be reverted back to the original.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 Under "Early Life", the sentence ''The man was a kind man and died in 1886'' is blatantly opinionated. The date of death may be verifiable, but it is a value judgment whether or not he was really a kind man. Now, you may be able to provide a reference stating that he was ''considered by some'', or even by many, to be a kind man. You may be able to establish the fact that this was a generally-held opinion of him, but you cannot take an opinion and try to present it as a fact. [[User:Dementia13|Dementia13]] ([[User talk:Dementia13|talk]]) 19:34, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
+== Picture ==
+the "restored" picture appears to be a kim jong-il-level photomanipulation that leaves this dude looking like a pageant queen. i mean, if people think this heavily photoshopped version is better, by all means leave it, but i think it should probably be reverted back to the original.