After you made the revert, the same problem is happening again. The problem is not my personal problem, it is something affecting Wikipedia and our readers and editors. It is necessary to fix the problem instead of a simple revert. --[[User:Reference Desker|Reference Desker]] ([[User talk:Reference Desker|talk]]) 06:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
After you made the revert, the same problem is happening again. The problem is not my personal problem, it is something affecting Wikipedia and our readers and editors. It is necessary to fix the problem instead of a simple revert. --[[User:Reference Desker|Reference Desker]] ([[User talk:Reference Desker|talk]]) 06:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
:First, that would not fix the problem on existing pages, since the template is substituted, not transcluded. Second, that makes it out of sync with all the other xfd top templates (e.g., {{tl|tfd top}}, {{tl|mfd top}}, etc.). Third, it breaks scripts such as [[User:Mr.Z-man/hideClosedAFD.js]], which is used by a good number of AfD closers. So, no, it's not a good idea. The proper fix is to fix what is actually broken - i.e., the Book generator, not to break something else. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens#top|talk]]) 06:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
:First, that would not fix the problem on existing pages, since the template is substituted, not transcluded. Second, that makes it out of sync with all the other xfd top templates (e.g., {{tl|tfd top}}, {{tl|mfd top}}, etc.). Third, it breaks scripts such as [[User:Mr.Z-man/hideClosedAFD.js]], which is used by a good number of AfD closers. So, no, it's not a good idea. The proper fix is to fix what is actually broken - i.e., the Book generator, not to break something else. [[User:Timotheus Canens|T. Canens]] ([[User talk:Timotheus Canens#top|talk]]) 06:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
==Edit Filter Apology==
Hello,
I apologize for triggering the edit filter. I had read about the edit filter and wanted to see it in action.
Why did you erase my edits on my talk page?
Have a nice day! [[Special:Contributions/99.150.255.75|99.150.255.75]] ([[User talk:99.150.255.75|talk]]) 15:32, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
If you are interested in trying Kissle, edit the dedicated "requests" section below. Please leave bug reports and feature requests on this page. Thanks.
My off-wiki communications policy: I prefer, to the extent possible, that all communications regarding a Wikimedia matter be done on-wiki for the sake of transparency. If there is a compelling reason why it should be done off-wiki, you may email me or talk to me on IRC, but:
For IRC, timely, prompt, or indeed any response is not guaranteed. I stay on IRC even if I am away. If you do not get a response, you may simply send your entire inquiry (i.e., instead of "may I ask a question", ask the question!), in which case I'll treat it like emails when I come back to my computer.
For emails, I will try to respond as soon as I can, but real-life work obviously must take precedence, and it is easy for incoming emails to get lost after a few days. If you don't get a response within a few days, try leaving me a message on my talk page.
In all cases, I will respond on-wiki unless there is a compelling reason not to or you explicitly request that I keep it off-wiki. In the latter case, I reserve the right to not respond at all to the message.
Please do not send private or confidential information; those should be directed to the Arbitration Committee.
Reason: Per WP:MILMOS#NOTE, only recipients of the highest national award (in this case the Medal of Honor) are automatically notable; I'm unable to find any reliable sources on this subject other than the citation.
After you made the revert, the same problem is happening again. The problem is not my personal problem, it is something affecting Wikipedia and our readers and editors. It is necessary to fix the problem instead of a simple revert. --Reference Desker (talk) 06:20, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
First, that would not fix the problem on existing pages, since the template is substituted, not transcluded. Second, that makes it out of sync with all the other xfd top templates (e.g., {{tfd top}}, {{mfd top}}, etc.). Third, it breaks scripts such as User:Mr.Z-man/hideClosedAFD.js, which is used by a good number of AfD closers. So, no, it's not a good idea. The proper fix is to fix what is actually broken - i.e., the Book generator, not to break something else. T. Canens (talk) 06:47, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Edit Filter Apology
Hello,
I apologize for triggering the edit filter. I had read about the edit filter and wanted to see it in action.
Why did you erase my edits on my talk page?