User talk:99.130.8.150: Difference between revisions
Doug Weller (talk | contribs) |
→Dog meat: Qwyrxian POV and control of the Dog meat article is out of line with presenting to readers neutral comparative/related studies: he also deletes the messages I leave on his talk page: he should be banned. |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
Please explain on [[Talk:Dog meat]] why you think those links belong in see also. Can I add [[Beef]], which is a taboo food in India? What about [[Pork]], which is a taboo food for over a billion people? You're adding them, I assume, because in Dog, Cat, and Horse meat are all taboo from ''your'' perspective. But other cultures would beg to differ. Unless you can show on that article's talk page why those 2 meats are particularly closely connected to Dog meat, I will remove them again. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 07:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC) |
Please explain on [[Talk:Dog meat]] why you think those links belong in see also. Can I add [[Beef]], which is a taboo food in India? What about [[Pork]], which is a taboo food for over a billion people? You're adding them, I assume, because in Dog, Cat, and Horse meat are all taboo from ''your'' perspective. But other cultures would beg to differ. Unless you can show on that article's talk page why those 2 meats are particularly closely connected to Dog meat, I will remove them again. [[User:Qwyrxian|Qwyrxian]] ([[User talk:Qwyrxian|talk]]) 07:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC) |
||
: The two messages I've made make on user Qwyrxian talk page had been removed by Qwyrxian, a non-Japanese living in Japan with strong and unequal opinions how different Asian cultures/nations and western cultures/nations should be presented and viewed. Wikipedia have considerable contingents of those heavily POV'ed westerners making their POV'ed edits especially in regards to Asian culture and history. In the case of the Dog meat article, I pointed out that Americans, and those claiming "democracy" and animal rights, should not be offended by my inclusion of the reference of similarly social and moral consequences consuming of Horse meat and now Whale meat, to the See Also reference of the Dog meat article. The double standards exhibited by these "free willed" westerners out to control the Asian image is most astonishing: they should be the last to hide the Horse meat(and whale meat) references in the See Also section of the Dog meat article: it is AFTER ALL, a SEE ALSO reference to related comparative studies, and nothing to do whether the said animal can be someones pet or not: but what righteous or self-righteous people claim to be inappropriate for human consumption, regardless of cultural or ethnic background of the general consumers of such indicated meat animals. [[Special:Contributions/99.130.8.150|99.130.8.150]] ([[User talk:99.130.8.150#top|talk]]) 03:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== May 2011 == |
== May 2011 == |
||
Revision as of 03:21, 21 May 2011
 Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account! Your , so you might receive messages on this page that were not intended for you. To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free. If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. Administrators: review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.  Network administrators or other parties wishing to monitor this IP address for vandalism can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format. |
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. -- 03:39, 24 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi!
What's Up? The dragon has been added and removed many times. The thing is, it is more a mithological being, not a cryptid. Thanks for your efforts and entusiasm. --Againme (talk) 13:48, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edits
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:36, 2 March 2010 (UTC)
about me
what's this? i don't understand this page.
BLP Unsourced
Hi. The BLP unsourced template is only for articles that have no sources at all. Thanks. Gigs (talk) 22:20, 15 March 2010 (UTC)
September 2010
Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test on the page Xue Chen worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. JV Smithy (talk) 01:48, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Why I reverted
I reverted because you included Example.jpg JV Smithy (talk) 01:56, 6 September 2010 (UTC)
Huh? I did not include any image file. Even more astonishing is how the response took like only ONE MINUTE. Truly an Unknown unknown99.130.8.150 (talk) 04:03, 18 October 2010 (UTC)
October 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Koro (medicine), but we cannot accept original research. Original research also encompasses novel, unpublished syntheses of previously published material. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thank you. Phoenixrod (talk) 15:42, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Image Revert
The image added was not vandalism. This picture clearly shows where the fold can extend to.--Hengsheng120 (talk) 18:55, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
November 2010
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Koro (medicine). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Please use reliable sources for any citation. Thank you.Dono (talk) 13:44, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 19:27, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
Dog meat
Please explain on Talk:Dog meat why you think those links belong in see also. Can I add Beef, which is a taboo food in India? What about Pork, which is a taboo food for over a billion people? You're adding them, I assume, because in Dog, Cat, and Horse meat are all taboo from your perspective. But other cultures would beg to differ. Unless you can show on that article's talk page why those 2 meats are particularly closely connected to Dog meat, I will remove them again. Qwyrxian (talk) 07:49, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- The two messages I've made make on user Qwyrxian talk page had been removed by Qwyrxian, a non-Japanese living in Japan with strong and unequal opinions how different Asian cultures/nations and western cultures/nations should be presented and viewed. Wikipedia have considerable contingents of those heavily POV'ed westerners making their POV'ed edits especially in regards to Asian culture and history. In the case of the Dog meat article, I pointed out that Americans, and those claiming "democracy" and animal rights, should not be offended by my inclusion of the reference of similarly social and moral consequences consuming of Horse meat and now Whale meat, to the See Also reference of the Dog meat article. The double standards exhibited by these "free willed" westerners out to control the Asian image is most astonishing: they should be the last to hide the Horse meat(and whale meat) references in the See Also section of the Dog meat article: it is AFTER ALL, a SEE ALSO reference to related comparative studies, and nothing to do whether the said animal can be someones pet or not: but what righteous or self-righteous people claim to be inappropriate for human consumption, regardless of cultural or ethnic background of the general consumers of such indicated meat animals. 99.130.8.150 (talk) 03:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
May 2011
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Chariot. Thank you. Dougweller (talk) 04:50, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.