Jump to content

Talk:Germany–United Kingdom relations: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
grammar and syntax: new section
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
The article is neither neutral nor of high quality, it appears like a loose collection of facts without systematic analysis. "Blaming it all on the British" is also quite out of the question. Please could someone clean this up?
The article is neither neutral nor of high quality, it appears like a loose collection of facts without systematic analysis. "Blaming it all on the British" is also quite out of the question. Please could someone clean this up?
<small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:194.199.252.252 |194.199.252.252 ]] ([[User talk:194.199.252.252 |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/194.199.252.252 |contribs]]){{#if:2006-11-17T16:07:58 (UTC)|&#32;2006-11-17T16:07:58 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->
<small>—The preceding [[Wikipedia:Sign your posts on talk pages|unsigned]] comment was added by [[User:194.199.252.252 |194.199.252.252 ]] ([[User talk:194.199.252.252 |talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/194.199.252.252 |contribs]]){{#if:2006-11-17T16:07:58 (UTC)|&#32;2006-11-17T16:07:58 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned -->

But the British are to blame! So what do you expect? Lying? Bending the facts? --[[Special:Contributions/92.223.57.28|92.223.57.28]] ([[User talk:92.223.57.28|talk]]) 12:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


Needs a complete rewrite. Could then do with images.--[[User:Boson|Boson]] 07:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
Needs a complete rewrite. Could then do with images.--[[User:Boson|Boson]] 07:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:35, 31 May 2011

WikiProject iconGermany Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note icon
This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
Note icon
This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the |unref= from this template.
WikiProject iconUnited Kingdom Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject iconInternational relations Start‑class High‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
HighThis article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

For now, I am going to slap an NPOV label on this - I can scarcely believe that it is credible to accredit any sourness in Anglo-German relations solely to 'xenophobic' Britons. There is always give and take in a relationship and it is not the case that the relationship would be made absolutely perfect if only the big bad Englishman did not mention the war and march around like Basil Fawlty. What nonsense. InfectedWithRage 23:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is neither neutral nor of high quality, it appears like a loose collection of facts without systematic analysis. "Blaming it all on the British" is also quite out of the question. Please could someone clean this up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.199.252.252 (talkcontribs) 2006-11-17T16:07:58 (UTC).

But the British are to blame! So what do you expect? Lying? Bending the facts? --92.223.57.28 (talk) 12:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a complete rewrite. Could then do with images.--Boson 07:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "Anglo-" part strikes me as overly England-centric, considering that the article is about relations with the United Kingdom. Hairy Dude 13:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to a much better article

University of Exeter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.224.58.187 (talk) 17:22, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

That article isn't "much better", it's just as biased towards the British as the current article is on Wikipedia. Dancingwombatsrule (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am German, and I don´t see the point here ( but it might be because my english ist too bad ) anyway, I agree with the others, that this article is rubbish. It starts somewhere in the 18th century and does not reach further then the time between the war. And please mention the war =) And I think a link to the episode of Fawlty towers would be great in order to understand parts of the english mentality. Please also mention German equivalents as well.

I think something that at least somehow affected the realtioinship between Gemany and England was the case of the German boy/young man beeing accused for (attemted?) rape in Turky. At least the german Media seemed to condamn all english, and it was suggested that all english beleived it was rape, while in Germany it was debatable. I for my part researched english Sites und figured out that the english as well debated heavily an the theme. Sad example for the german press.

Last but ot least an artikel from a german newspaper, about english-german relationship, source is a english professor http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2006/06/06/570299.html

All the best ~~Arghaile~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arghaile (talkcontribs) 22:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Should mention period of tensions before WWI

Mainly caused by Germany bulking up its navy, which was mostly just a matter of international prestige for Germany, but which was considered by the British a threat to their basic existence (since Britain was not self-sufficient in basic food production and depended on maritime food imports to avoid starvation), and which therefore launched a naval arms race, and set the stage for the Anglo-French "Entente Cordiale" and subsequent events (see German Naval Laws, High Seas Fleet, Tirpitz Plan etc.) AnonMoos (talk) 07:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-German relationsUnited Kingdom - Germany relations — I think we need to move the article from Anglo-German relations to United Kingdom - Germany relations as this article deals with the UK as a whole, not just England. EuroPride (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

German spouses

"Every British monarch from George I to Edward VII in the twentieth century, took a Royal German spouse."
Edward VII's consort was Danish.
Varlaam (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has changed the word 'until' to 'to'. I will fix itIndisciplined (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

grammar and syntax

i agree with all the criticisms of the content of this article, but i am equally amazed that an article written in such bad english can be allowed to remain on this site. there is a mistake in nearly every sentence! 62.254.78.128 (talk) 11:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]