Talk:Germany–United Kingdom relations

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany High‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been marked as needing immediate attention.
	This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the `\|unref=` from this template.

United Kingdom High‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

International relations High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

For now, I am going to slap an NPOV label on this - I can scarcely believe that it is credible to accredit any sourness in Anglo-German relations solely to 'xenophobic' Britons. There is always give and take in a relationship and it is not the case that the relationship would be made absolutely perfect if only the big bad Englishman did not mention the war and march around like Basil Fawlty. What nonsense. InfectedWithRage 23:01, 11 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article is neither neutral nor of high quality, it appears like a loose collection of facts without systematic analysis. "Blaming it all on the British" is also quite out of the question. Please could someone clean this up? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 194.199.252.252 (talk • contribs) 2006-11-17T16:07:58 (UTC).

But the British are to blame! So what do you expect? Lying? Bending the facts? --92.223.57.28 (talk) 12:35, 31 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Needs a complete rewrite. Could then do with images.--Boson 07:17, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The "Anglo-" part strikes me as overly England-centric, considering that the article is about relations with the United Kingdom. Hairy Dude 13:51, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reference to a much better article

University of Exeter —Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.224.58.187 (talk) 17:22, August 30, 2007 (UTC)

That article isn't "much better", it's just as biased towards the British as the current article is on Wikipedia. Dancingwombatsrule (talk) 13:08, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am German, and I don´t see the point here ( but it might be because my english ist too bad ) anyway, I agree with the others, that this article is rubbish. It starts somewhere in the 18th century and does not reach further then the time between the war. And please mention the war =) And I think a link to the episode of Fawlty towers would be great in order to understand parts of the english mentality. Please also mention German equivalents as well.

I think something that at least somehow affected the realtioinship between Gemany and England was the case of the German boy/young man beeing accused for (attemted?) rape in Turky. At least the german Media seemed to condamn all english, and it was suggested that all english beleived it was rape, while in Germany it was debatable. I for my part researched english Sites und figured out that the english as well debated heavily an the theme. Sad example for the german press.

Last but ot least an artikel from a german newspaper, about english-german relationship, source is a english professor http://www.abendblatt.de/daten/2006/06/06/570299.html

All the best ~~Arghaile~~ —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arghaile (talk • contribs) 22:12, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Should mention period of tensions before WWI

Mainly caused by Germany bulking up its navy, which was mostly just a matter of international prestige for Germany, but which was considered by the British a threat to their basic existence (since Britain was not self-sufficient in basic food production and depended on maritime food imports to avoid starvation), and which therefore launched a naval arms race, and set the stage for the Anglo-French "Entente Cordiale" and subsequent events (see German Naval Laws, High Seas Fleet, Tirpitz Plan etc.) AnonMoos (talk) 07:44, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 07:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anglo-German relations → United Kingdom - Germany relations — I think we need to move the article from Anglo-German relations to United Kingdom - Germany relations as this article deals with the UK as a whole, not just England. EuroPride (talk) 13:55, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - as with similar articles, this is the usual term, rightly or wrongly, and covers the whole of the UK. Johnbod (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

German spouses

"Every British monarch from George I to Edward VII in the twentieth century, took a Royal German spouse."
Edward VII's consort was Danish.
Varlaam (talk) 15:46, 14 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Someone has changed the word 'until' to 'to'. I will fix itIndisciplined (talk) 22:16, 2 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

grammar and syntax

i agree with all the criticisms of the content of this article, but i am equally amazed that an article written in such bad english can be allowed to remain on this site. there is a mistake in nearly every sentence! 62.254.78.128 (talk) 11:20, 9 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Germany–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:

Attempted to fix sourcing for http://ukiniceland.fco.gov.uk/en/our-office-in-iceland/our-embassy-in-reykjavik/embassy-history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:10, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Germany–United Kingdom relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151225025456/http://fowid.de/fileadmin/datenarchiv/Religionszugehoerigkeit/Religionszugehoerigkeit_Bevoelkerung_2010_2013.pdf to http://fowid.de/fileadmin/datenarchiv/Religionszugehoerigkeit/Religionszugehoerigkeit_Bevoelkerung_2010_2013.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:05, 11 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Napoleonic Wars section is lacking

The brief discussion of Anglo-Prussian relations during the Napoleonic Wars would suffice if the wars ended in about 1806 with a French victory. Instead, Britain and Prussia were on the winning side of the Napoleonic Wars and this profited both powers immensely- establishing definitive British global supremacy and empowering Prussia to later become the key power on the European mainland. Prussian generals (Blücher) became celebrities in Britain. This is significant and warrants a mention. F.M. Sir D.H (talk) 23:11, 8 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]