User talk:76.110.165.51

May 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Ernst Lindemann, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

• Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Ernst Lindemann was changed by 76.110.165.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.978103 on 2011-05-27T23:32:11+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:32, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Football in Italy. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Football in Italy was changed by 76.110.165.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904416 on 2011-05-29T13:19:39+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:19, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pacific Ocean, you will be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Pacific Ocean was changed by 76.110.165.51 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.866431 on 2011-05-29T13:22:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:22, 29 May 2011 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

76.110.165.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

76.110.165.51 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Username1234567891011". The reason given for Username1234567891011's block is: "Vandalism-only account".

• Blocking administrator: Tnxman307 (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Your contributions indicate unblocking the IP would be unwise at this time.  狐 Déan rolla bairille!  20:11, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Why would it be unwise? I won't vandalize again promise!

June 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Joël Giraud with this edit, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. jorgenev 19:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Konichiwa.  —SMALLJIM  19:52, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so when the block expires. If you feel this block is unjustified, you may contest it by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.  —SMALLJIM  19:54, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.110.165.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

these edits i make are construcive not vandalism. idk what u talk about

Decline reason:

Right. Kuru (talk) 19:57, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with Casino Royale and Ghana.--hydeblake (talk) 18:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. -- Cirt (talk) 18:40, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.110.165.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I believe I have been wrongly blocked. Hyde blake told me that was my last warning, and that if i vandalize again i will be blocked then you blocked me. I haven't vandalized since so i should be unblocked. 76.110.165.51 (talk) 18:53, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Vandalism after recently expired block. Therefore, you already vandalised and as soon as you could edit, you vandalised again, clearly only a vandal. The Helpful One 19:05, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

76.110.165.51 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The warning clearly states that You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page. Since there was no next time in vandalizing, I still don't understand why I got blocked. 76.110.165.51 (talk) 19:18, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You are blocked because we don't want to clean up after your vandalism any more. Since you don't appear to have anything useful to offer Wikipedia, there is no reason to unblock you. Since, in addition to wasting our time with vandalism, you are now also wasting our time with unblock requests, I will help you by disabling your talk page access. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.