Talk:Bob Crane: Difference between revisions
m The use of sections really helps with readability! |
|||
Line 66: | Line 66: | ||
There are no sources for the above claim and it also seems like that its a ad for bobcrane.com.--[[Special:Contributions/72.150.117.55|72.150.117.55]] ([[User talk:72.150.117.55|talk]]) 02:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
There are no sources for the above claim and it also seems like that its a ad for bobcrane.com.--[[Special:Contributions/72.150.117.55|72.150.117.55]] ([[User talk:72.150.117.55|talk]]) 02:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC) |
||
:Without a cite, you're right to remove it, but I will say, I remember reading a verrrry strange article about Scotty (in like--the NY Times, I think?) when the movie came out. (Naturally I can't find the article now!) The guy has is-sues. Very belligerent about the movie, very defensive, and very "proud" of his dad. He also furiously rejected that his dad had had penile enlargement surgery. Like--how would you even KNOW that? [[Special:Contributions/69.86.96.214|69.86.96.214]] ([[User talk:69.86.96.214|talk]]) 05:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC) |
|||
== Dropped an interview and source. == |
== Dropped an interview and source. == |
Revision as of 05:06, 11 July 2011
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Biography: Actors and Filmmakers B‑class | |||||||||
|
{{WikiProject banner shell}}
to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.![]() | Connecticut B‑class High‑importance | |||||||||
|
Bobcrane.com, etc.
I removed the bobcrane.com adult content note because the website no longer hosts Crane's "home movies"
- I've tagged his decline with an "NPOV." It carries a somewhat moralistic tone, equating "church-going" with "good" and alleging that Carpenter was solely responsible for the turn of events. --AWF
- I've seen reference online to Bob's experimentation with home made pornographic films as going back to 1956, which is many years before Carpenter and even Hogan.
- Per his son, Robert Scott, Bob didn't go to church and he'd taken photos of himself with other women since the 1950s. I'm going to find the references and make changes regarding that.Gornzilla 03:32, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
Addiction
The guy was filming pornos, he wasn't addicted, there was no enabler, this is religious nonsense talk. 83.70.248.72 14:25, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hundreds upon hundreds of films with random anonymous women is a dysfunctional view of sexuality, even if it doesn't end you marriage (which it did). If Crane had been a woman, sleeping with mindreds of men and filming it, she would've been stoned. Crane was sick; religion has nothing to do with it. And aparently he passed on his pathology to his younger son; hosting your own dad's extra-marital sex on your website? That's really weird. I'm sure his mother appreciated that.208.120.100.30 06:17, 24 June 2007 (UTC)
I think the point the article's trying to make is that the film/mythology around Crane made portrayed the whole porno thing as an addiction.--68.76.233.134 17:51, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
--"She would've been stoned" ? Listen to yourself. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.149.203.252 (talk) 10:32, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
- He said "would've, which is distinctly different than "should have." And his assertion is pretty accurate, that's not socially acceptable behavior in our society for either gender. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.163.123 (talk) 19:15, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Hogans-Heroes-book.jpg
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/70px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
Image:Hogans-Heroes-book.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 23:45, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- Rationale added to image article. Johnmc (talk) 12:19, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
Grave Site
I notice there's no mention of where Bob's buried. He's interred at Pierce Bros. Westwood Village Memorial Park Cemetery. Here's a photo of his grave marker: http://www.zooomr.com/photos/13173@Z01/790369/
Note: I am the owner of this photograph. Permission is given to include it in the article if someone wants to add it. I'd do it myself but I don't really savvy how to do that.Bwanderson (talk) 02:36, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
bobcrane.com link
The bobcrane.com link does not have any info about Bob Crane at this time. Instead, it is about one of his wives. Perhaps its inclusion in the article should be reconsidered. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.89.192.125 (talk) 19:42, 25 August 2008 (UTC)
???
Where's the philandering? Where's the homemade sex films? The description of "Autofocus" is also lacking information on these topics. 155.84.57.253 (talk) 15:20, 10 November 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
This was moved without discussion based on Robert K. Crane sometimes being called "Bob Crane". The actor is clearly the primary topic for "Bob Crane" and per WP:DAB should be located at "Bob Crane" with a hatnote to the only other possible usage. Otto4711 (talk) 15:39, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- I indicated my support of this at the requested move page. Wildhartlivie (talk) 16:20, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
- Support. No question this is the primary use of Bob Crane, in fact the only use of that title. A hatnote is appropriate. Station1 (talk) 05:54, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
- this is clear cut. I'm moving it. ike9898 (talk) 07:02, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
I removed the following-
I removed the following-"Crane's second wife and their son Scotty objected to the way Crane was portrayed in the film, and took to the media to present their side of the story. Shortly before the film's release, Scotty also started the website www.bobcrane.com to provide documents and testimony that would contest the movie's version of his father's story."
There are no sources for the above claim and it also seems like that its a ad for bobcrane.com.--72.150.117.55 (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
- Without a cite, you're right to remove it, but I will say, I remember reading a verrrry strange article about Scotty (in like--the NY Times, I think?) when the movie came out. (Naturally I can't find the article now!) The guy has is-sues. Very belligerent about the movie, very defensive, and very "proud" of his dad. He also furiously rejected that his dad had had penile enlargement surgery. Like--how would you even KNOW that? 69.86.96.214 (talk) 05:06, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Dropped an interview and source.
Here I had restored content deleted anonymously because, it seemed, of a broken link. I fixed the link and restored the content. On review, however, I was not able to find another source to substantiate that one, and wp:BLP seems to apply (the man was talking about his father) and I don't feel the 1 link is enough, so I dropped the content, formally. If anyone disagrees, I certainly won't object to its restoration... but I won't restore it without another source that seems reliable enough, and I can't see it.- sinneed (talk) 19:51, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Carpenter ?
Who is "Carpenter"? The article doesn't explain. The first mention of the name is, "Crane allegedly called Carpenter to tell him that their friendship was over". -- Hux (talk) 22:12, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- John Henry Carpenter, who is discussed and linked in the preceding paragraph of the Bob Crane#Career after Hogan's Heroes (1973-1978) section. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:09, 19 April 2010 (UTC)
- Given the discussion in the Carpenter article of the allegations that he and Crane "frequented bars together, picking up women and often recording their exploits in snapshots and on videotape," it does seem odd that the Crane article skips from their introduction by Dawson to Crane terminating their friendship, followed by the murder and suspicions of Carpenter's involvement in it. I assume that something similar to the sentence I just quoted was once in the Crane article but was excised for whatever reason. In my opinion, just for the sake of continuity and clarification, some mention needs to be made of the allegations, because without it the passage doesn't make sense. - Mark Dixon 20:09, 30 May 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Elmarco (talk • contribs)
Awards 1965 or 1967
The bob crane website lists his nominations in 1965 and 1966 but NOT 1967. Can someonefix this??? or is this a website error??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 208.102.86.40 (talk) 20:54, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
- B-Class biography articles
- B-Class biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (actors and filmmakers) articles
- Actors and filmmakers work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Connecticut articles
- High-importance Connecticut articles
- WikiProject Connecticut articles