2012 United States Senate election in Michigan: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
→External links: added hoekstra for senate site |
→Polling: Added hypothetical polls. Even though these candidates have declined to run, I feel that these polls still have meaning and show the people's opinion of Debbie Stabenow |
||
Line 185: | Line 185: | ||
| align=center| — |
| align=center| — |
||
| align=center| 24% |
| align=center| 24% |
||
|} |
|||
<!-- = = = don't edit next six lines for Navbox below = = = --> |
|||
{| class="navbox collapsible collapsed" style="text-align:left; border:0; margin-top:0.2em;" |
|||
|- |
|||
! style="background:#cff; font-weight:normal;"| |
|||
'''Hypothetical polling''' |
|||
|- |
|||
| style="border:solid 1px silver; padding:8px; background:white;"| |
|||
<!-- = = = don't edit above six lines = = = --> |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- valign= bottom |
|||
! Poll source |
|||
! style="width:130px;"| Date(s)<br />administered |
|||
! class=small | Sample<br />size |
|||
! <small>Margin of</small><br />error |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Debbie<br />Stabenow (D) |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Saul<br />Anuzis (R) |
|||
! Other |
|||
! Undecided |
|||
|- |
|||
| Public Policy Polling ([http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MI_0323513.pdf report]) |
|||
| align=center| March 18-20, 2011 |
|||
| align=center| 502 |
|||
| align=center| ± 4.4% |
|||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} align=center| '''52%''' |
|||
| align=center| 35% |
|||
| align=center| — |
|||
| align=center| 13% |
|||
|} |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- valign= bottom |
|||
! Poll source |
|||
! style="width:130px;"| Date(s)<br />administered |
|||
! class=small | Sample<br />size |
|||
! <small>Margin of</small><br />error |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Debbie<br />Stabenow (D) |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| John<br />Engler (R) |
|||
! Other |
|||
! Undecided |
|||
|- |
|||
| Public Policy Polling ([http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MI_1208806.pdf report]) |
|||
| align=center| December 3-6, 2010 |
|||
| align=center| 1,224 |
|||
| align=center| ± 2.8% |
|||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} align=center| '''49%''' |
|||
| align=center| 42% |
|||
| align=center| — |
|||
| align=center| 9% |
|||
|} |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- valign= bottom |
|||
! Poll source |
|||
! style="width:130px;"| Date(s)<br />administered |
|||
! class=small | Sample<br />size |
|||
! <small>Margin of</small><br />error |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Debbie<br />Stabenow (D) |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Terri Lynn<br />Land (R) |
|||
! Other |
|||
! Undecided |
|||
|- |
|||
| Public Policy Polling ([http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MI_0323513.pdf report]) |
|||
| align=center| March 18-20, 2011 |
|||
| align=center| 502 |
|||
| align=center| ± 4.4% |
|||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} align=center| '''48%''' |
|||
| align=center| 38% |
|||
| align=center| — |
|||
| align=center| 14% |
|||
|- |
|||
| Public Policy Polling ([http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MI_1208806.pdf report]) |
|||
| align=center| December 3-6, 2010 |
|||
| align=center| 1,224 |
|||
| align=center| ± 2.8% |
|||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} align=center| '''45%''' |
|||
| align=center| 41% |
|||
| align=center| — |
|||
| align=center| 14% |
|||
|} |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
|||
|- valign= bottom |
|||
! Poll source |
|||
! style="width:130px;"| Date(s)<br />administered |
|||
! class=small | Sample<br />size |
|||
! <small>Margin of</small><br />error |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Debbie<br />Stabenow (D) |
|||
! style="width:100px;"| Candice<br />Miller (R) |
|||
! Other |
|||
! Undecided |
|||
|- |
|||
| Public Policy Polling ([http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_MI_1208806.pdf report]) |
|||
| align=center| December 3-6, 2010 |
|||
| align=center| 1,224 |
|||
| align=center| ± 2.8% |
|||
| {{party shading/Democratic}} align=center| '''43%''' |
|||
| align=center| 41% |
|||
| align=center| — |
|||
| align=center| 15% |
|||
|} |
|} |
||
Revision as of 18:08, 21 July 2011
| |||||||
| |||||||
|
Elections in Michigan |
---|
The 2012 Michigan United States Senate election will be held on November 6, 2012 alongside a presidential election, other elections to the United States Senate in other states, as well as elections to the United States House of Representatives and various state and local elections. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow is running for re-election to a third term.
Background
Incumbent Debbie Stabenow was re-elected in 2006 with 57% of the vote to 41% for Oakland County sheriff and former State Senate Majority Leader Michael Bouchard after narrowly defeating Republican incumbent Spencer Abraham in 2000.
Democratic primary
Candidates
- Debbie Stabenow, incumbent U.S. senator[1]
Republican primary
Candidates
Declared
- Chad Dewey, businessman[2]
- Randy Hekman, former juvenile court judge[3]
- Pete Hoekstra, former U.S. representative[4]
- Peter Konetchy, businessman[5]
- John McCulloch, Oakland County Water Resources Commissioner[6]
Exploring
Potential
- Jase Bolger, Speaker of the Michigan House of Representatives[8]
- Scotty Boman, libertarian activist[9]
- Clark Durant, co-founder of the Cornerstone Schools[7]
- Gary Glenn, Tea Party activist[7]
- Tim Leuliette, former Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Detroit Branch chairman[10]
- Stephen Markman, Michigan Supreme Court Justice[11]
- Al Pease, businessman[12]
- Rob Steele, cardiothoracic surgeon[13]
Declined
- Justin Amash, U.S. representative[14]
- Saul Anuzis, former Michigan Republican Party chairman[15]
- Frank Beckmann, talk show host[16]
- Mike Bishop, former State Senate Majority Leader[17]
- Mike Cox, former Michigan attorney general[18]
- John Engler, former Michigan governor[19]
- Terri Lynn Land, former Michigan secretary of state[20]
- Thaddeus McCotter, U.S. representative[21]
- Candice Miller, U.S. representative and former Michigan secretary of state[22]
Polling
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Justin Amash |
Saul Anuzis |
Chad Dewey |
Randy Hekman |
Pete Hoekstra |
Terri Lynn Land |
Tim Leuliette |
Tim Walberg |
Other/ Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (report) | March 18-20, 2011 | 360 | ± 5.2% | 4% | 5% | 3% | 4% | 38% | 18% | 0% | 4% | 24% |
General election
Polling
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Debbie Stabenow (D) |
Randy Hekman (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (report) | March 18-20, 2011 | 502 | ± 4.4% | 52% | 33% | — | 15% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Debbie Stabenow (D) |
Pete Hoekstra (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (report) | March 18-20, 2011 | 502 | ± 4.4% | 50% | 38% | — | 12% |
EPIC-MRA (report) | February 12-17, 2011 | 600 | ± 4.0% | 44% | 42% | — | 14% |
Public Policy Polling (report) | December 3-6, 2010 | 1,224 | ± 2.8% | 45% | 44% | — | 11% |
Poll source | Date(s) administered |
Sample size |
Margin of error |
Debbie Stabenow (D) |
Tim Leuliette (R) |
Other | Undecided |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Public Policy Polling (report) | December 3-6, 2010 | 1,224 | ± 2.8% | 47% | 30% | — | 24% |