Jump to content

Template:Did you know nominations/Hieronim Ossoliński: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 42: Line 42:
Could I get an update here? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font style="color:blue;background:orange;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Volunteer Marek&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 00:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)
Could I get an update here? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font style="color:blue;background:orange;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Volunteer Marek&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 00:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)


FOR FUCK'S SAKE I NOMINATED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO.<small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:Volunteer Marek|<font style="color:blue;background:orange;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Volunteer Marek&nbsp;'''</font>]]</span></small> 07:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)
Reviewed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Der_Handschuh_%28Waterhouse%29 Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)]
Reviewed [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Der_Handschuh_%28Waterhouse%29 Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)]



Revision as of 07:08, 7 December 2011

Hieronim Ossoliński

Created/expanded by Volunteer Marek (talk). Self nom at 02:26, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

  • There is a problem with the hook because the article is structured incorrectly. The Union of Lublin appears in the WP:LEAD and nowhere else in the article. However, the LEAD is suppose to be a summary of more detailed content in the main body of the article.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Good point! I fixed it. Volunteer Marek  19:53, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
That fact is not really well cited. The citation comes much later in the paragraph and it does not say the citation is in a foreign language. The citation should clearly state the language (which I am guessing might be Polish).--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:15, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
The citation for the 2nd half of the hook uses the term "mooted the possibility of creating a National Church", which does not to me seem to support the fact claimed of "wanting to establish the Church of Poland"--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 05:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)
Added a few more citations and indicated which ones were in Polish.
Also, I can't find now the linking of the Polish National Church to Henry of England. It's in some other source, but I'm away for Thanksgiving so I can't look it up in books I have at home. So I took that part out for now. So here's ALT1:
... that Hieronim Ossoliński, a 16th century protestant Polish politician who helped to unite Poland and Lithuania also wanted to establish a National Church of Poland?.
 Volunteer Marek  06:06, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
{{cite book}} actually has a "|language=" parameter. Use that instead of the other method you are using.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:24, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
Thanks, fixed that.
I still contest the 2nd half of this hook.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 17:38, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
On what basis? There's two sources there now. The second one says (skipping diacritics) "Utworzylo sie tez z czasem karne kolo poslow sejmowych ktorym przewodzili Hieronim Ossolinski i Rafal Leszczynski... Na pierwszym miejscu kladziono utworzenie kosciola narodowego."
Translation: "Overtime a faction of sejm delegates formed, who were led by Hieronim Ossolinski and Rafal Leszczynski ... the primary demand was the establishment of a national church". Volunteer Marek  22:57, 25 November 2011 (UTC)
It's the "modeled after Henry VIII's Church of England" part that's dubious due to no references. A bit ORish. Davies talks of a national church, I'd stick with that unless we have a better source. Also, I see no refs for "Church of Poland" term. Alt proposed below. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 00:27, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
That's fine. As I mentioned above, I have some source for comparison with England at home but I'm away for Thanksgiving break. Volunteer Marek  00:34, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
I can't approve because the term mooted to me means something like obfuscated or rendered pointless. I won't contest someone else who wants to approve the hook. I would approve the hook without the national church stuff.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:32, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
Moot, as defined by my dictionary (Google): "Raise (a question or topic) for discussion; suggest (an idea or possibility)." Seems that if you raise and suggest an idea, you want it to happen. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk to me 03:56, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

Could I get an update here?  Volunteer Marek  00:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

FOR FUCK'S SAKE I NOMINATED THIS OVER A MONTH AGO. Volunteer Marek  07:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC) Reviewed Der Handschuh (Waterhouse)