Talk:George C. Homans: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 13:33, 8 December 2011

Biography: Science and Academia Start‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Sociology Start‑class

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Comment

As someone who contributed to the content of this article, I notice that there is still a call for "Wikify" work. I ask that someone with an interest in the subject (Homans) who has a better grasp of Wikipedia style, take some steps that are responsive to the Wikify request. Tom Fararo 14:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Taking initiative

In the section on propositions the original contributor used the term "we" to which another inserted a bracketed [who]. Would it not have been just as easy to correct a grammatical slip as point it out, especially when there is no change to content or context? This collabrative effort requires more initiative than simply identifying a typo, fix the obvious and cite the ambiguous, please.

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 ==Comment==
 As someone who contributed to the content of this article, I notice that there is still a call for "Wikify" work.  I ask that someone with an interest in the subject (Homans) who has a better grasp of Wikipedia style, take some steps that are responsive to the Wikify request. [[User:Tom Fararo|Tom Fararo]] 14:33, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
+== Taking initiative ==
+In the section on propositions the original contributor used the term "we" to which another inserted a bracketed [who]. Would it not have been just as easy to correct a grammatical slip as point it out, especially when there is no change to content or context? This collabrative effort requires more initiative than simply identifying a typo, fix the obvious and cite the ambiguous, please.