Could you tell me whether the chord progression of [http://www.musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtdFPE.asp?ppn=MN0097775 this] remains E–A–B throughout the chorus and middle eight as well? Thanks. BTW what do you think of 1D? Honestly. —<font face="IrishJig">'''[[User:Adabow|<font color="green">Andrew</font>]]'''<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Adabow|<font color="white">s</font>]]'''[[User talk:Adabow|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'''</sub></font> 06:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Could you tell me whether the chord progression of [http://www.musicnotes.com/sheetmusic/mtdFPE.asp?ppn=MN0097775 this] remains E–A–B throughout the chorus and middle eight as well? Thanks. BTW what do you think of 1D? Honestly. —<font face="IrishJig">'''[[User:Adabow|<font color="green">Andrew</font>]]'''<sub>[[Special:Contributions/Adabow|<font color="white">s</font>]]'''[[User talk:Adabow|<font color="blue">talk</font>]]'''</sub></font> 06:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
:I can see a change to the flat keys during the line "Don't Need makeup to cover...". You can say that the tone shifts one key down I guess. I honestly have listened to two songs by 1D, they are cool I guess. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 07:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
:I can see a change to the flat keys during the line "Don't Need makeup to cover...". You can say that the tone shifts one key down I guess. I honestly have listened to two songs by 1D, they are cool I guess. — <font color="blue">[[User:Legolas2186|''Legolas'']]</font> [[User talk:Legolas2186|<sup>(<font color="red">talk</font><font color="green">2</font><font color="orange">me</font>)</sup>]] 07:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
Hi Legolas, I wondered if you could create [[Government Hooker]] since there is enough information [http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Government_Hooker here]. Bye![[User:Flores,Alberto|Flores,Alberto]] ([[User talk:Flores,Alberto|talk]]) 18:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)
I wish I could. But he only vandalized me a few times, some of which were censored by Oversighters before I got to read them. This is almost as good though. —WP:PENGUIN·[ TALK ]14:24, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Trolls for breakfast? LMAO!! That's just classic. We have such a diva / legend / icon amongst us. Shine under its holy lights Stan, repent for all ya sins. — Legolas(talk2me)14:27, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I hate how TW adds everything to your watchlist and it's so slow! Anyway, we have Brexx, Charlie, Theman, anyone else I need to know about? —WP:PENGUIN·[ TALK ]14:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Meh, if I stick up that always, from where will "Go die you pile of shit" come from? That line has just been inducted into the Wikipedia Abusing Hall of Fame 2011. — Legolas(talk2me)15:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The user once came back in one of its avatar, called me LEgalos and said "Yu did vandilism and Im not Dunce-poop" Attention whote much? "Dunce" "Poop"? Enough said. — Legolas(talk2me)15:45, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You shouldn't be so judgmental. But I know you don't care about what people think of you anyway so, I will not waste my energy typing in this thread anymore. It's obvious you don't like me, for no apparent reason, so that's your failing, not mine. Calvin • Watch n' Learn14:56, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
You wanna know why I said surprisingly? Because most of the time, in any article you edit, I see you making same mistakes over references, MoS, sources, content when me, Jivesh and the rest have probably screamed enough times and pointed out them to you in GAN, GAR, FACs etc. Somehow you don't learn and then portray a high-and-mighty attitude in FACs as if they were born to hand the bronze star to you. Guess what? You either earn it, and if you can't then focus, listen to what others are saying, drop the attitude and challenge yourself to better. Calvin, some articles take really long time to pass a certain level and losing your head over it is not the right thing. Call me a bitch all you want, I won't fluff you up to hand you something that's not true. I don't "hate" you, but frankly I stopped caring long back. — Legolas(talk2me)15:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Calvin, I hope you at least know that I still consider you as my friend but yes, you changed a lot lately and I don't know why. And Avi is somehow right, in all your GANs that I have reviewed, I have to tell you the same things repeatedly. One day, you will have an or many FACs but as Avi said, it is not easy to get one but it is possible. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:05, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) I don't expect anyone to hand me a bronze star. You know how hard I've worked on that article, I've been editing it for 6 months now. It's a long to time to be always improving it and making changes that other people say. Like you, I say things how they are, and on GANs, FACs, whatever, if I don't understand what someone means or if I want to make a suggestion, I will say it. It's a two way street. To be honest, with your edit summaries, conversations with other people and comments about me, I really don't understand why you dislike me so much? I mean, what have I ever done to you? Nothing. I knew it was crap what you wrote on Novice's talk page "Me and Calvin have never really got long, but all that will change soon". I've always had the impression that you haven't wanted to get along, with all the sniggers and whispers about me on here. Calvin • Watch n' Learn15:10, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Ya, I did want to go along with you after I came back, but seeing your attitude in every FAC, talk pages etc, I changed my mind. As I said, I really don't care about it anymore and I don't "hate" you, I'm indifferent. Please drop this, I'm good on my own way, and you please be on your way, if ever you think about it, remember, attitude is a BIG thing in FACs and in RL also. — Legolas(talk2me)15:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict)Calvin, I am not taking anyone's side but this ^^^ is false. Avi has changed (positively). And please how many times will I tell you to stop thinking about S&M, it will never pass as long as it remains how it is now. You have to work more on it rather than asking for copy-edits. Too many copy-edits spoil the prose and this is an advice Avi gave me in 2010. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 15:15, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
(edit conflict) To be honest, I knew nothing would change. Your perception of how I am in FACs is not what I am like in RL, or even in simple conversation in non-wikipedia related things, but you wouldn't know that as you have made no conscious effort to find out. Perhaps it would be enlightening for you to know other people's perceptions of you on here, but I wouldn't drop other people in it. So clearly, I am not the bad person you think I am. Calvin • Watch n' Learn15:17, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I'll give it a few weeks since the merge discussion was fairly recent and I don't want the article to be failed again for stability reasons. I wonder why Stephen has such a problem with the article. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:36, 26 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
What to do dear? The artist name alone here is trumping all other rules and regulations. People know that this will be eventually created and that's what seems the case here. — Legolas(talk2me)16:08, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Is...
... this reliable? The information is true but I cannot find a reliable source for it, nor can I find one which stated that Thierry Mugler designed Knowles' gold dress for the music of "Sweet Dreams". Jivesh1205 (Talk) 13:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Avi. How's it going? I was wondering if I could possibly ask you a mini-favour. (If you don't have the time or inclination, no worries—maybe I can ask someone else.) Could you look at Tute and tell me if you think the game rules are clear? This is an article I've been reviewing for GA. When I started the review I thought, "This one looks like fun—a card game." But I soon found that the rules were kind of complicated, and I've been getting bogged down on it. (I've been actively trying to help the editor to improve it, which I tend to do—which is usually fun, but in this particular case I have reached my limit on it.) It has definitely become clearer than it was, but I kind of need a set of fresh eyes to judge how clear it is. I'm not asking you to edit it, just say whether you can understand the rules well enough. If you can, I may just pass it. If you can't, I may just fail it. I need to finish off the review and be able to move on to other things. One thing I've learned is that I don't want to ever review card game articles again! :P Moisejp (talk) 17:44, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I see your note above as I'm posting this, but the concerns appear to have been addressed three weeks ago and the review looks ready to be closed, so hopefully you can get to this soon. If you're unable to I could wrap it up. WizardmanOperation Big Bear21:51, 28 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, Legolas2186. Please check your email; you've got mail! It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Avi, you now how tricky it can be at times to write a decent composition section. Please tell me... the step word here, is the the one that concerns walking or this one? I would say it is the walking one but please consult the sources in that section and tell me what you think as you are the only Mr. Know It All who I know. Lol. Jivesh1205 (Talk) 17:57, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oops I missed it. Sorry. I think the correct usage is The piano work is augmented by handclaps and beats provided by a stomp box. That way you dont have to link it to Coltrane. REmember, step sounds are basically beats which occur at pristine progression, the process being helped by the stomp box. Leaving it at just beats allows you not to explain it further. LEt's not bog the section down technically. — Legolas(talk2me)08:12, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Hello, and welcome to the 2012 WikiCup! The competition officially begins at the start of 2012 (UTC) after which time you may begin to claim points. Your submission page, where you must note any content for which you wish to claim points, can be found here, and formatting instructions can be found in hidden comments on the page. A bot will then update the main table, which can be seen on the WikiCup page. The full rules for what will and will not be awarded points can be found at Wikipedia:WikiCup/Scoring. There's also a section on that page listing the changes that have been made to the rules this year, so that experienced participants can get up-to-date in a few seconds. One point of which we must remind everyone; you may only claim points for content upon which you have done significant work, and which you have nominated, in 2012. For instance, articles written or good article reviews started in 2011 are not eligible for points.
This round will last until late February, and signups will remain open until the middle of February. If you know of anyone who may like to take part, please let them know about the comeptition; the more the merrier! At the end of this round, the top 64 scorers will progress to the next round, where their scores will reset, and they will be split into pools. Note that, by default, you have been added to our newsletter list; we will be in contact at the end of every month with news. You're welcome to remove yourself from this list if you do not wish to hear from us. Conversely, those interested in following the competition are more than welcome to add themselves to the list. Please direct any questions towards the judges, or on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn (talk) and The ed17 (talk) 17:54, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Favor!
Hey Lego. How are you? I need a little favor from you. I am working on List of Rihanna concert tours and I am basing in on the model from the Madonna ones that you created. Can you check the lead, c/e, and tell me what you think about it. It's still not finished, but the first paragraph is done. Thanks — Tomica1111 • Question Existing?15:04, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Could you tell me whether the chord progression of this remains E–A–B throughout the chorus and middle eight as well? Thanks. BTW what do you think of 1D? Honestly. —Andrewstalk06:44, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can see a change to the flat keys during the line "Don't Need makeup to cover...". You can say that the tone shifts one key down I guess. I honestly have listened to two songs by 1D, they are cool I guess. — Legolas(talk2me)07:27, 4 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
