Jump to content

User talk:Ksanthosh89: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ksanthosh89 (talk | contribs)
Ksanthosh89 (talk | contribs)
Line 140: Line 140:
:Please see above - he has been blocked for 72 hours for this & related actions. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 12:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
:Please see above - he has been blocked for 72 hours for this & related actions. [[User:GiantSnowman|Giant]][[User talk:GiantSnowman|Snowman]] 12:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)


Dont I know to answer that. Why are you coming to my user page? Stupid. [[User:Ksanthosh89|Santhosh k]] ([[User talk:ksanthosh89|talk]]) 12:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
Dont I know to answer that. Why are you coming to my user page? [[User:Ksanthosh89|Santhosh k]] ([[User talk:ksanthosh89|talk]]) 12:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 12:40, 24 January 2012

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Ksanthosh89, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Sodabottle (talk) 09:35, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thank you....Santhosh k (talk)

August 2011

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Languages of India. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. — Bill william comptonTalk 05:41, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

sorry for the same. I will give an edit summary for the same

An Invite to join the WikiProject Education in India

- - - - - - - - - - - - WikiProject Education in India - - - - - - - - - - - -
Hi, Ksanthosh89, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Indian Education ! The WikiProject Indian Education is an evolving and expanding WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories and Wikiprojects, to do with anything related to Indian Education System(Schools,Colleges and Universities).

As you have shown an interest in article related to Education in India we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject.Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to welcoming you to the project ! To join the project please click here

naveenpf (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining WP:INEI .. Be bold to give the suggestion in talk to improve the wikiproject WP:INEI --naveenpf (talk) 01:29, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invite to WikiConference India 2011


Hi Ksanthosh89,

The First WikiConference India is being organized in Mumbai and will take place on 18-20 November 2011.
You can see our Official website, the Facebook event and our Scholarship form.(last date for submission is 15 August 2011)

But the activities start now with the 100 day long WikiOutreach.

Call for participation is now open, please submit your entries here. (last date for submission is 30 August 2011)

As you are part of Wikimedia India community we invite you to be there for conference and share your experience. Thank you for your contributions.

We look forward to see you at Mumbai on 18-20 November 2011

naveenpf (talk) 01:26, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Race course, Ooty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Race course, Ooty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Race course, Ooty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sp33dyphil "Ad astra" 13:50, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Just as a note...

If a article you created is nominated for CSD, please don't remove the CSD template, as you did here. You actually can get blocked for doing that on purpose, so you know. If you were allowed to, or have a very, very good reason to do so, I recommend you at least say so in the edit summary. LikeLakers2 (talk | Sign my guestbook!) 19:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimedia Stories Project

Hello,

My name is Victor Grigas, and I'm a storyteller at the Wikimedia foundation. We're telling stories of Wikipedia users, editors, donors, programmers and staff to paint a picture of who uses Wikipedia - for the 2011 fundraiser.

I am in the process of planning a trip to India to gather stories from Indian Wikipedians in face-to-face interviews (possibly on video).

My primary goal is to conduct 15-20 interviews, and hopefully enough of my interviews will make compelling stories that will effectively solicit donations from the public. These stories may also be used for other communication purposes by the foundation.

I found your userpage on a list of prolific Wikipedians and thought I’d reach out to you. Prolific editing is always a good story to tell!

If you are interested in participating, please contact me via my email:

vgrigas@wikimedia.org

Thank you for your time!

Victor

About me: I have been a Wikipedia editor since 2005. My userpage can be found here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Victorgrigas

In response to your feedback

Hi Ksanthosh89 -- welcome to Wikipedia! We're glad to have you here, and happy you're enjoying editing. If you've got any questions, feel free to drop me a line on my talk page. Thanks!

Sue Gardner (talk) 06:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

 

Proposing articles for deletion

Hi Ksanthosh89. I've just had to !vote a procedural keep on two of your recent sumissions to WP:AFD, because you have failed to provide any valid rationale for deletion. Please take a moment to read the deletion policy in order to understand what does and does not qualify an article to be deleted. If you want any assistance or explanation, I'd be happy to help; just let me know on my talkpage. Yunshui  11:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

STOP. Right now.

Please DO NOT nominate any further articles for deletion until you have at least read and understood WP:DP and WP:BEFORE. If you continue in this vein I will have to raise a report at WP:ANI. It is clear that you are new to the process of WP:AFD, and I'd be happy to help you learn the ropes, but these malformed nominations are not they way to go about it. Yunshui  11:50, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

First you study the article. Tel me what reason I can give. There is nothing in these articles. Only two lines are there. It is not an article. Santhosh k (talk) 11:54, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Which article? You have nominated so many today it's impossible to know which one you're referring to. Brevity is not a reason for deletion, see WP:STUB. Yunshui  11:58, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See my all deletion articles (that is not an article, thats all words. ) Only two lines are there. Thats why I nominated for deletion. Santhosh k (talk) 12:01, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you are now nominating every article I have created for deletion, in clear violation of WP:POINT. I have thus requested a block at WP:ANI. Yunshui  12:10, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Yunshui  11:57, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked 3 days for harassment. --MuZemike 12:18, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but please read our guide to appealing blocks first.
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ksanthosh89 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I will also give 2 line articles. Which I have nominated for deletion are two line articles. First confirm me that two line articles can be created without ref.

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Salvio Let's talk about it! 12:29, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ksanthosh89 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Thank You.:-)

Decline reason:

Procedural, no unblock request. S.G.(GH) ping! 12:35, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Deletions requests for Bajutsu and Bugei jūhappan

Please stop nominating articles for deletion with out leaving and reason for the request.Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 12:36, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please see above - he has been blocked for 72 hours for this & related actions. GiantSnowman 12:38, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Dont I know to answer that. Why are you coming to my user page? Santhosh k (talk) 12:39, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]