User talk:Od Mishehu

Category:Wikipedians who support proprietary software

A category you created is currently being discussed at Wikipedia:User_categories_for_discussion#Category:Wikipedians_who_support_proprietary_software. User:Dorftrottel 16:37, January 15, 2008

Word88 Page Protection

Thanks for protecting that page. Reverting was becoming annoying. Take Care and Happy Thanksgiving...NeutralHomer • Talk • November 27, 2008 @ 06:34

Weird day....

Hey i'm mczack26, im from the i.p. adress

90.204.97.40

Which you just declined, is this a way of verifinging that tilejoin is no longer on this address? There are other people on the network who edit anon.

P.S. It's a sad day when people can't edit anon on wikipedia...

A page with this title has previously been deleted.

Hi, Please let me know if you need anything to make the page again. Thanks.

"If you are creating a new page with different content, please continue. If you are recreating a page similar to the previously deleted page, or are unsure, please first contact the deleting administrator using the information provided below.

   * 10:31, September 22, 2009 Od Mishehu (talk | contribs) deleted "Category:Bangladesh Fashion Week" ‎ (Empty category (CSD C1))

"

Ani medjool

Please see WP:ANI where I've raised an issue concerning Ani medjool, who is subject to the WP:ARBPIA case. Mjroots (talk)

User:ישעיהו שוורץ

Normally I'd welcome ישעיהו שוורץ (talk · contribs), but in this case I think you are a better editor to do that as I'm he-0! Would you do the honours please? Mjroots (talk) 21:08, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Robertgreer#Ballet News

Hello, Od Mishehu. You have new messages at Robertgreer's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Helping prepare for your desired outcome at XfD discussions

Hello, Od Mishehu. You have new messages at Dawynn's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

User:Od Mishehu/Template:Unblock-global

Hiyas there Mishehu,

You are probably still quite busy with it, but your new template currently has the "Requests for unblock" category, causing it to register as a user who wishes to be unblocked in {{category|Requests_for_unblock}}. I guess it misses a bit of syntax here or there to prevent that. :) Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 13:54, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Global Unblock template

Hi. Just wanted to drop by and let you know your page here is being listed here. Not sure why that is though. Cheers! TNXMan 13:55, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Template appearing at "Requests for unblock"

Unfortunately your page User:Od Mishehu/Template:Unblock-global was showing up in the list of users requesting unblocks. I am sure this problem can be dealt with by appropriate use of "noinclude" etc, but I don't have time to sort out the details, so I have blanked the page for now, and will leave it for you to correct. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:58, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

I now see that two other admins had already posted to you about this. Clearly it was likely to waste time for lots of us. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:00, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

It's doing it again - got me rather confused... Peridon (talk) 09:19, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

I palced a HTML comment tag around the switch causing this, for now. Excirial ^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 09:23, 27 April 2012 (UTC)

Request for more time to edit Al Hulailah

I see that one minute after I tagged Al Hulailah for more time before speedy deletion, you deleted it. As you will have seen on the article's talk page before deletion, the author said that he/she was new to editing and would edit the article. On the face of it, this seems like a case of biting a newcomer. Can you explain why you chose not to allow the requested extra time? JamesBWatson (talk) 12:46, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Loking at the page, I saw no significant amount of work worth saving. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:52, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

I agree, but is there any harm in leaving it for ten minutes, to avoid being unnecessarily negative to a new editor? As far as I can see, there would be two possible outcomes: (1) the user adds good content, so we gain an article, (2) the user doesn't add any useful content, so we delete it a little later, and nothing has been lost. In addition, even if immediate deletion would have been your choice, after another administrator has reviewed the speedy deletion nomination and made a decision on it you need fairly solid reasons for overturning that decision. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:26, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Probably an "action clash" - you edited the page to the extent of declining the speedy more or less at the same time that I deleted it; there was no way for me to have seen your edit before I deleted it. (Note that 1 minute apart in the logs could represent mere seconds.) Now that I see this, I've reversed my action. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:30, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

OK, I accept that you probably didn't see my note before making your decision. I've been in the same situation myself. Sorry to have doubted you. JamesBWatson (talk) 19:53, 8 May 2012 (UTC)

Carlton O'callahan

Your move of Carlton O'callahan to User:Carlton55 may not have been the best move. The article Carlton had written seemed more like a personal or dating site profile than a Wikipedia user page. Since user pages are supposed to be used to define one's activities related to Wikipedia, this user page seems entirely inappropriate. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 15:25, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

It looked borderline to me, and in the name of BITE it seemed like the least bad solution. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 03:29, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias.

Urgent Help and Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 is engaging in serious hacking activities, not just simple acts of vandalism in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias.

Warning: the IP address, 212.121.219.1 registered to Oldham MBC public libraries, and which is permanently blocked in English Wikipedia since 2009, is the source of serious hacking activities. Today on 14 May 2012 other vulnerable Wikipedia encyclopedias are under attack from this address where it is not blocked. This source is capable of hacking Wikipedia, as it is the case today in the other Wikipedia encyclopedias, because it has erased the history archives for instance in the Azerbaijan articles of the Wikipedia encyclopedias and is doing it in other country articles as well, which no simple vandal can do. This source is freely roaming and usurping right now.

Can anyone inform the administrators of the other Wikipedia encyclopedias and help them against the IP address, 212.121.219.1, because most of the small Wikipedia encyclopedias are vulnerable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.224.23.137 (talk) 21:52, 14 May 2012 (UTC)