User talk:LeadSongDog

untitled

review article http://newenergytimes.com/v2/library/2009/2009Krivit-S-ANewLookAtLENR-Preprint.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by StevenBKrivit (talk • contribs) 01:56, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

Plagiarism of article about plagiarism in law against plagiarism.

Re [1].

The first edit diff is the problem. The source is the 2010-05-21t15:37:56z version of Wikipedia:Wikipedia Signpost/2010-05-17/In the news written by User:TomasBat, User:HaeB, User:Ottre, User:Amorymeltzer, and User:Tony1. It may have been a meta joke OrangeMike forgot to later attribute. -- Jeandré, 2010-08-25t18:16z

Wikipedia:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#Placoderm_Papers_Request

Hi! What exactly are you looking for? Please specify and reply to my talk page. I'll be glad to help you. Thank you, -- Doc Taxon (talk) 17:15, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your reply. Okay, I already ordered this issue. Possibly I can copy it this week. -- Doc Taxon (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I already sent the wanted article to user:Apokryltaros (Mr. Fink). Should you need some stuff more, let me know by wikimail. Thanx, -- Doc Taxon (talk) 16:00, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Good on 'ya! Thank you.LeadSongDog come howl! 16:14, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LeadSongDog. You have new messages at Dougweller's talk page.
Message added 17:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Dougweller (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue LXXIV, May 2012

Your Military History Newsletter Project news: From the editors; award recipients; contest results Articles: The month's Featured and A-class content Book reviews: Bomzibar on Chiang Kai-shek; Nick-D on the Falklands War Interview: Article writers discuss biographies Op-ed: Nick-D examines using news articles as sources

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Ed ^{[talk] [majestic titan]} 14:57, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Tilde

You forgot 5 tildes, which generates 18:57, 26 May 2012 (UTC) William M. Connolley (talk) 18:57, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Ah, there's alway

• six (unsigned local time): ... 16:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)~ or
  
• seven (unsigned UTC datetime): 16:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)~~ or
  
• eight (signed UTC datetime): 16:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)LeadSongDog come howl! or
  
• nine (signed local time and day with repeated local time and day): 16:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)LeadSongDog come howl! 16:24, 1 June 2012 (UTC)
  

This could be a new wikigame!

F1 vandal MO

Hi LeadSongDog. With regard to this edit, the vandal also targets F1 season summary articles, which reside in Category:Formula One seasons. (I wasn't sure whether it was appropriate for me to edit the abuse response report directly myself, since I'm not one of the people investigating it). Regards. DH85868993 (talk) 08:26, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, LeadSongDog. You have new messages at Scottywong's talk page.
Message added 23:28, 1 June 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

-Scottywong| yak _ 23:28, 1 June 2012 (UTC)

Verifiability mediation - choosing the RfC structure

Hello LeadSongDog! You are cordially invited to a discussion at the verifiability mediation in which we will be deciding once and for all what combination of drafts and general questions we should have in the RfC. We would love to hear your input, so why not hop over and let us know your views when you next have the chance. Thanks! — Mr. Stradivarius ^{(have a chat)} 16:11, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Sorry to have done something called refspam, question

LeadSongDog-

Am I correct that the issue of refspam is not the article referenced, but the website on which that article sits? In that case I can site the article as long as it is on a neutral website (such as a professional organization or a journal website. Is that correct? Thanks for helping me learn this stuff. I was not intending to cause a problem and can certainly site the clinical trial results on websites not associated with products.

RagingDog (talk) 21:48, 6 June 2012 (UTC)RagingDog

No, the issue is misusing a WP article to promote something. Whether that something is a product, a charity, an author, a website, or a publication is quite a secondary issue. We don't seek to find a place on Wikipedia to put a mention of a source. We don't use source citations as a way to publicize those sources. We seek out the best available sources on the topic of the article and use those best sources. You've previously been directed to wp:MEDRS, which explains what distinguishes a reliable medical source for use on Wikipedia. Clinical studies generally do not qualify, as they are primary sources. LeadSongDog come howl! 22:00, 6 June 2012 (UTC)

Mediation Cabal: Case update

Dear LeadSongDog: Hello, this is to let you know that a Mediation Cabal case that you are involved in, or have some connection with:

Wikipedia:Mediation Cabal/Cases/27 February 2012/Wikipedia:Verifiability

is currently inactive as it has not been edited in at least a week. If the issues in the case have been resolved, please let us know on our talk page so we can close the case. If there are still issues that need to be addressed, let us know. If your mediator has become inactive, also let us know. The case will be closed in one month if it remains inactive. You can let us know what's going on by sending a message through to your mediator, Mr. Stradivarius, on their talk page. Thanks! MedcabBot (talk) 09:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)