User talk:Holocron: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:48, 23 April 2006

testing

Welcome to Wikipedia, Holocron

Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

Here are some handy tips:

You can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~
Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page.

I have photos on my userpage so you can look at that code to figure it out. Jokermage ^{"Timor Mentum Occidit"} 21:06, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!!!

WP:NH

Check out Wikiproject New Hampshire if you are interested in working on New Hampshire articles! We're always looking for help.

Also don't forget to sign your comments using four tildes (~~~~). Jokermage ^{"Timor Mentum Occidit"} 21:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

the vandal

Wikipedia:Vandalism has the process for dealing with vandals. Jokermage ^{"Timor Mentum Occidit"} 21:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User 207.200.116.7

I'm sorry, but that's an AOL IP address. This user cannot be blocked.

-- Denelson 83 06:12, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

about the vandal

I responded to 12.210.1.200 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log) on his talk page. Sometimes these people can actually become good contributors; one never knows. And it's easy enough to block them again. Thanks for the message, Antandrus (talk) 20:31, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I did not vandalize the marijuana party article, 69.199.251.31 did. 199.185.87.202 18:21, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings again. It looks like he's currently blocked for six months ([1] -- when there are two concurrent blocks, the shorter takes precedence). I see no good edits from the account at all since the incident in early January, the last block by FCYTravis looks good to me--we are, after all, an encyclopedia and not a baby-sitting service. Happy editing, Antandrus (talk) 16:07, 20 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE:

Don't worry about it. It's only a mistake anyways. Just make sure you put comments on the talk page. --Ichiro (会話|+|投稿記録|メール) 15:23, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Communism

Hi Holocron! Looks like that vandal is gone now. Usually at this time on a weekday those are kids at school computers, especially when they are "silly" edits; they're rarely on for more than an hour. Thanks for your vandalism patrolling and happy editing! Antandrus (talk) 16:22, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's a no no

You shouldn't edit user pages, as you did mine. Moriori 21:00, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Geese I thought I was helping...-- User:Holocron 12:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not really, but that's OK, I changed it back. Moriori 20:34, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You're a jerk, you know? Your about as bad as user: Curps.--Holocron 18:45, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Insults are a no no as well. Incidentally. Moriori 20:29, 2 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to argue with you but to quote you: "I must be doing something right, I've been attacked by the loopies". Would that not be considered an insult. It was a simple misunderstanding that I edited your userpage. I explained (I know it wasn't a very good explanation but...) and you came back and wrote some snide comment. I don't know what your problem is with me...--Holocron 03:36, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You elevate yourself to loopie status if you want to -- I didn't. My userpage was vandalised by serial vandal User:68.8.183.78 and by User:209.158.191.252 who "likes to wear pink slippers!" All vandals are loopies of the first order IMMHO, and I commented that I must be doing something right (because loopies only target constructive editors/articles). I accepted your assurance that you "thought you were helping" when you edited my user page, by responding "Not really, but that's OK. I changed it back". You now say that was a snide remark and you responded to it by calling me a jerk. What part of "that's OK" do you not understand? And you say you don't know what MY problem is. Sheesh. Moriori 07:12, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I overreacted, I was not having the best of days yesterday. If you look at my edits yesterday, you'll find most of them are negative and probably ticked more people off than just you. Perhaps "jerk" was not the appropriate word. I appologize for calling you a jerk.--Holocron 14:23, 3 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you (reply)

Thank you for revering the childish vandalism on my user page.--Holocron 15:09, 26 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your welcome! I just revert one times:)--Ugur Basak 02:05, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Lamborghini6.jpg

Holocron - Where did this image come from? You wrote that you created it yourself but it looks like there is a commercial watermark on it. -SCEhard T 15:39, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No problem! I'll take care of it. I found your user page because I had Street Sweeper on my watchlist after I split it from street sweeper a while ago. There are a couple problems with some of your other images, mainly license tags. I'll list them here in a minute along with suggested fixes. -SCEhard T 15:48, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Opr022OW.jpg - I have changed the tag on this image to {{promophoto}}. Also, if it is not used in an article, it will be deleted after a week (see {{or-fu-nr}})
Image:Opr022OWsmall.jpg - same as above
Image:Nighttrees.jpg - If you took this picture yourself, it should have one of the following licenses (your choice): {{PD-self}}, {{GFDL}}, or a Creative Commons license.
Image:Thegorge.jpg, Image:Thegorge.jpg and Image:Image-thelake.jpg - Did you take these photos yourself? They are unusually small for personal photographs.
Image:Assault riffle HK.jpg - This image needs a source (Who owns the copyright?) and an appropriate license (probably fair use, but only if you are going to use it in an article. Fair use images cannot be used on user pages.)
Image:Protecta.jpg - This photo's tag should be {{Fairusein}} and you will need to make a short explanation of why you are claiming fair use (such as "There are no available free use photos of this gun")

If you have any questions, please ask! -SCEhard T 16:10, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but a bunch of stuff has come up - I'll get back to you tonight around 9pm EST. -SCEhard T 19:12, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the images you took yourself, there is no problem with those. For future reference, the normal procedure is to upload the full-sized image and then use the wiki software to resize the image (see Wikipedia:Picture_tutorial#Resizing). This way, the larger image is available if someone needs it later. Of course, you may choose not to upload the larger version of your image if you want to retain full rights to the high resolution version.

Regarding the image here, the copyright is still owned by the person who took the photo. In order to use it on Wikipedia, you would need to contact them and ask them to release it under one of the free licenses mentioned above. If they agree, it is fine to go ahead and upload the image with their statement of permission placed on the image page. -SCEhard T 22:22, 27 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:62.197.126.10

Your response to the above user regarding vandalism was somewhat strong and is excessive and confrontational. Warning vandals is fine, but threatening them with a baseball bat it way over the top. Please refrain. Gretnagod 12:57, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but he's been vandalizing my page from day one. Plus I just had to respond to his kind comment: YOU STUPID FUCKING ASSHOLE I DIDNT DO SHIT!I NEVER EVEN HEARD OF YOU SO SHUT THE FUCK UP OR ILL KILL YA MOM. Hmmm, I think he might be angry...--Holocron 14:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Point taken! Gretnagod 17:14, 8 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User pacifist3

I deleted it, as you can see from the deletion log. Although the TfD debate was an unsurprising no consensus, Jimbo Wales has introduced a new speedy deletion criterion, cited on my talk page in reply to you by Doc glasgow, which pretty clearly applies to this userbox. It had been twice tagged (by admins) for speedy deletion, and that seemed reasonable to me I've stayed firmly out of the furore surrounding userboxes, but the introduction of a new CSD provides clarity enough to remove this one. -Splash^talk 13:45, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

Re: this edit, please consult Wikipedia:Civility and refrain from being incivil to other contributors. Christopher Parham (talk) 23:10, 9 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

About the Protecta

I turned the Protecta article into a redirect to DAO-12. I saw this to be the best way to work, because as you can see, The DAO-12 article has been turned into a real article and I saw no sense in keeping a separate stub about the gun. Arctic-Editor 10:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Camera

Hi Holocron!
All my photos are taking by me (except those I adjust from the FPC page). If you look at a photo and scroll to the bottom it shows my camera details (Canon 20D, Tamron 28-75mm f/2.8 for most - I recently got a 17-40 f/4 L and will soon be uploading pics taken by it). D70 is a pretty good camera, but I think you would be better off getting either a 20D like me, or if you want to save a bit - a 350D. Personally I'm a Canon man and don't think Nikon has got the edge :-). Thanks for your comment ! --Fir0002 00:30, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

(RE) Canon is probably the second best brand out there. My friend has a Canon Digital Rebel, it's nice but you have to coddle it like a baby due to its frailness. Not that I don't take good care of my equipment anyway... I have upgraded my camera seen [here]. Nice to see another photographer on Wikipedia!--Holocron 15:25, 13 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Body

The front and rear bumpers have been reshaped to channel air more efficiently. The new exhaust has been shaped into the rear diffuser to eradicate [[aerodynamic lift

Reshaped front and rear bumpers direct air more efficiently, while the exhaust is now incorporated into the rear diffuser to help cancel out aerodynamic lift at high speeds.

Lamborghini has also created a larger air intake on the left side to feed the oil cooler.

For those wishing to show off the LP's 6.5-litre V12 to full effect, a glass engine cover can be ordered.

Under the steel and carbon fibre skin, revised suspension copes with the increased performance, while ceramic brakes are an option to help bring things to a halt more swiftly and efficiently.

There's also a four-wheel-drive system that normally splits 70 per cent of the torque to the back, but can allocate up to 100 per cent to each end depending on where the grip is running out.

There are also new 18-inch Hermera alloy wheels running huge 335/30 tyres at the rear, but one thing that hasn't changed with the LP640 is the Murciélago's signature scissor-opening doors.

Inside, there are reshaped seats for improved comfort and greater headroom, while a revised instrument panel is flanked by a new stereo system.

@@ Line 113: / Line 113: @@
 :(RE)  Canon is probably the second best brand out there.  My friend has a Canon Digital Rebel, it's nice but you have to coddle it like a baby due to its frailness.  Not that I don't take good care of my equipment anyway...  I have upgraded my camera seen [[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NikonD70S.jpg here]].  Nice to see another photographer on Wikipedia!--[[User:Holocron|Holocron]] 15:25, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
-==Holding==
-Iam in the process of creating an artical and I gathered some information off of another website and I am in the process of rewriting this information in my own words:
-The Lamborghini LP640 is the lastest car off of Lamborghini's production line.  It is built off of the basic [[Murcielago]] concept yet with an upgraded body style, and a more powerful engine.
 ==Body==