User talk:Reaper Eternal

Userpage	Talkpage	Articles Worked On	Current Article	Public Sandbox	Barnstars	Console

See archiving a talk page for more information. Archives Archive #1 (October 2010 to November 29, 2010) Archive #2 (November 29, 2010 to January 14, 2011) Archive #3 (January 14, 2011 to February 28, 2011) Archive #4 (February 28, 2011 to April 8, 2011) Archive #5 (April 8, 2011 to June 16, 2011) Archive #6 (June 16, 2011 to July 22, 2011) Archive #7 (July 22, 2011 to August 4, 2011) Archive #8 (August 4, 2011 to August 22, 2011) Archive #9 (August 22, 2011 to September 19, 2011) Archive #10 (September 21, 2011 to November 6, 2011) Archive #11 (November 6, 2011 to December 21, 2011) Archive #12 (December 22, 2011 to February 1, 2012) Archive #13 (February 1, 2012 to March 14, 2012) Archive #14 (March 14, 2012 to April 27, 2012) Archive #15 (April 30, 2012 to ???)

 Skip to bottom  ► 

UMSC

It's your block, but I'm inclined to suggest unblock/namechange. They seem to have acted in good faith and the links could be useful - and are non-commercial. Have another look and see what you think. Peridon (talk) 19:10, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I'd be inclined to accept the unblock, but I don't think that the links are useful, as they merely lead to the university's site for scheduling times to come review their collections rather than to any actual information on the topic. (See WP:ELNO #1 and #6, and WP:EL#ADV.) On the other hand, citing the material itself would definitely be fine. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:26, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

I've gone ahead with the unblock, since they've agreed to quit spamming and change user names. Of course, any return to past behavior will not go over too well. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me} 19:30, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

P.S.

I see another IP has had similar problems with trying to remove stuff from a talk page. Is it possible to have that filter fixed so it doesn't prohibit the removal of content, just warns? I can think of plenty of legit reasons to do that kind of edit. Egg Centric 20:20, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

• Special report: Springer's misappropriation of Wikimedia content "the tip of the iceberg"

• News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI

• WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit

• Featured content: The cake is a pi

• Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases

• Technology report: To support or not to support IPv6, and why knowing when this report was last updated might be getting easier

• Read this Signpost in full
• Single-page
• Unsubscribe
• EdwardsBot (talk) 22:38, 12 June 2012 (UTC)

hlep

What Did The Page Ditchingham Behavior School before it was deleted look like. Pacman451 (talk) 21:38, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Closure tests

I'm done the five you gave me.—cyberpower ^Chat_Online 23:25, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

block evasion

Apparently you blocked me for "block evasion", a few days ago. What is that about and which block did i "evade"? I would assume, there would have to have been some block in the first place. I also find it odd that such action is taking against me by you, without any explanation. Please explain yourself and you actions. -- 85.81.20.149 (talk) 16:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)It is possible someone else was using your IP address and you got caught in the block that was meant for the other user. You should consider creating an account to help avoid such instances.—cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 16:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

But then again, maybe not.—cyberpower ^Chat_{Limited Access} 16:50, 18 June 2012 (UTC)

It just me I strongly believe. However, I would very much like an explanation for the "block evasion" nonsens, and why this error was made. -- 85.81.20.149 (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2012 (UTC)