User talk:Trio The Punch: Difference between revisions
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Trio_The_Punch_reported_by_User:Jeannedeba_.28Result:_.29 this 3RR complaint]. I imagine this might be closed with no block if you will agree to refrain from now on from restoring any posts at [[Talk:Pope Benedict XVI]] that have been removed by others. If you agree to this, please comment at WP:AN3. What I see is that one IP has been adding posts to Talk which seem to violate [[WP:BLP]]. By restoring these IP posts, it seems to me that you also are violating [[WP:BLP]]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
Regarding [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:Trio_The_Punch_reported_by_User:Jeannedeba_.28Result:_.29 this 3RR complaint]. I imagine this might be closed with no block if you will agree to refrain from now on from restoring any posts at [[Talk:Pope Benedict XVI]] that have been removed by others. If you agree to this, please comment at WP:AN3. What I see is that one IP has been adding posts to Talk which seem to violate [[WP:BLP]]. By restoring these IP posts, it seems to me that you also are violating [[WP:BLP]]. Thank you, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 16:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
:Finally, an admin! You already know it won't be closed with a block, because Jeannedeba has stopped vandalising and we only block people to protect the wiki, not to punish them. I understand it may ''seem'' that way to you, but it is a bit more complicated. Marauder40 has tried to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMarauder40&diff=525552462&oldid=525550086 hide the evidence], but this is not a protect-the-[[WP:BLP|BLP]]-case this is a case of people who violating [[WP:TPO]] because of their religion. Please read that link carefully. [[User:Trio The Punch|Trio The Punch]] ([[User talk:Trio The Punch#top|talk]]) 16:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
:Finally, an admin! You already know it won't be closed with a block, because Jeannedeba has stopped vandalising and we only block people to protect the wiki, not to punish them. I understand it may ''seem'' that way to you, but it is a bit more complicated. Marauder40 has tried to [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AMarauder40&diff=525552462&oldid=525550086 hide the evidence], but this is not a protect-the-[[WP:BLP|BLP]]-case this is a case of people who violating [[WP:TPO]] because of their religion. Please read that link carefully. Thanks in advance, [[User:Trio The Punch|Trio The Punch]] ([[User talk:Trio The Punch#top|talk]]) 16:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 16:26, 29 November 2012
| “ | WEEBLES FALL DOWN! | ” |
| — Trio The Punch – Never Forget Me... | ||
Trio The Punch, you are invited to the Teahouse
|
Hi Trio The Punch! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:20, 5 November 2012 (UTC) |
Thank you
|
I, Acceptable, hereby award you this original barnstar for helping me with my macro clicking question. |
Simpler solutions
A few days ago you a couple of other editors helped me on this question Wikipedia:Reference_desk/Archives/Computing/2012_November_21#Converting_a_CTRL_key_into_a_FN_key I took my laptop to my friend and said to him, right how shall we go about doing this? He looked the keyboard and said: can't you just use the [Fn Lock] key that's also on the right hand side? Ah. *embarrassed face* almost-instinct 16:49, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hahahaha. Trio The Punch (talk) 16:58, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Possible solution to the 3RR case
Regarding this 3RR complaint. I imagine this might be closed with no block if you will agree to refrain from now on from restoring any posts at Talk:Pope Benedict XVI that have been removed by others. If you agree to this, please comment at WP:AN3. What I see is that one IP has been adding posts to Talk which seem to violate WP:BLP. By restoring these IP posts, it seems to me that you also are violating WP:BLP. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 16:18, 29 November 2012 (UTC)
- Finally, an admin! You already know it won't be closed with a block, because Jeannedeba has stopped vandalising and we only block people to protect the wiki, not to punish them. I understand it may seem that way to you, but it is a bit more complicated. Marauder40 has tried to hide the evidence, but this is not a protect-the-BLP-case this is a case of people who violating WP:TPO because of their religion. Please read that link carefully. Thanks in advance, Trio The Punch (talk) 16:25, 29 November 2012 (UTC)