Jump to content

Talk:Diana DeGette: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Assessment for WP:USA using AWB
No edit summary
Line 8: Line 8:
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|class=start}}
{{WikiProject U.S. Congress|class=start}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low|CO=Yes|CO-importance=Mid|listas=Degette, Diana}}
{{WikiProject United States|class=Start|importance=Low|CO=Yes|CO-importance=Mid|listas=Degette, Diana}}


[[gun control]] it states "she supports the second amendment" when it needs to read "she claims to support the second amendment." By any objective standard she does NOT support the Second Amendment. If I were a congressman and I claimed to support civil rights, but then I introduced bills allowing torture and indefinite detention, any objective person would conclude I did not actually support civil rights but merely claimed to support them. She has a 0% ranking from the two largest pro-2nd Amendment groups in the USA and she has a record of introducing bills to ban millions of firearms. By no objective standard does she support the second amendment. The section on her and gun control is best written "she claims to support" and leaving it up to the reader to decide if her claims are valid.

Revision as of 06:25, 6 January 2013

WikiProject iconBiography: Politics and Government Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconU.S. Congress Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
This article has not yet been assigned a subject.
The options are: "Person", "People", "Place", "Thing", or "Events".
WikiProject iconUnited States: Colorado Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by WikiProject Colorado, our collaboration to improve, create, and update Wikipedia articles about the U.S. State of Colorado.
To comment about this article, select the New section tab above.
For questions about, or to make suggestions for Colorado articles, go to our project's talk page. We invite you to join us!


gun control it states "she supports the second amendment" when it needs to read "she claims to support the second amendment." By any objective standard she does NOT support the Second Amendment. If I were a congressman and I claimed to support civil rights, but then I introduced bills allowing torture and indefinite detention, any objective person would conclude I did not actually support civil rights but merely claimed to support them. She has a 0% ranking from the two largest pro-2nd Amendment groups in the USA and she has a record of introducing bills to ban millions of firearms. By no objective standard does she support the second amendment. The section on her and gun control is best written "she claims to support" and leaving it up to the reader to decide if her claims are valid.