Talk:Serbia: Difference between revisions
→Geographical mistake: new section |
|||
Line 94: | Line 94: | ||
Area field includes Kosovo, but population field does not. Why?--[[User:Strower|Strower]] ([[User talk:Strower|talk]]) 17:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC) |
Area field includes Kosovo, but population field does not. Why?--[[User:Strower|Strower]] ([[User talk:Strower|talk]]) 17:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
:Serbian sources probably do not have reliable figures for Kosovo's population as it has not been under their control for over a decade. Using Serbian sources for the population of Vojvodina and the rest of Serbia and adding Kosovan figures for the population of Kosovo would constitute original research on our part. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 13:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
:Serbian sources probably do not have reliable figures for Kosovo's population as it has not been under their control for over a decade. Using Serbian sources for the population of Vojvodina and the rest of Serbia and adding Kosovan figures for the population of Kosovo would constitute original research on our part. --[[User:Khajidha|Khajidha]] ([[User talk:Khajidha|talk]]) 13:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC) |
||
== Geographical mistake == |
|||
Geographical mistake is made by defining Serbian borders, because Serbia is where Serbs are, so borders of Serbia should be from Tokio to Milwaukee. English language is just a small subdialect of Serbian language. So such mistakes should be corrected. Serbs all and everyway. |
Revision as of 22:35, 14 March 2013
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serbia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 15, 2005, February 15, 2006, February 15, 2007, February 15, 2008, February 15, 2009, February 15, 2010, February 15, 2011, February 15, 2012, and February 15, 2013. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Serbia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 90 days ![]() |
Request to Include Factual Info on Serbia
The first state to be found in breach of the Genocide convention was Serbia. In the Bosnia and Herzegovina v. Serbia and Montenegro case the International Court of Justice presented its judgment on 26 February 2007. It cleared Serbia of direct involvement in genocide during the Bosnian war,[1] but ruled that Belgrade did breach international law by failing to prevent the 1995 Srebrenica genocide, and for failing to try or transfer the persons accused of genocide to the ICTY, in order to comply with its obligations under Articles I and VI of the Genocide Convention, in particular in respect of General Ratko Mladić.[2][3]
Edit request on 31 July 2012
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please update religion per Religion in Serbia and Religion in Vojvodina. The actual informations are OK, but I mostly think of updating the bar boxes ('colour columns') with new informations added and also making Religion in Vojvodina one of main articles of 'Religion' section. So, change
{{bar box |width = 250px |float = left |title = Religious groups in Serbia <small>(excluding Kosovo)</small> in 2002<ref name="popis2002"/> |titlebar = #ddd |bars = {{bar percent|Orthodoxy|blue|84.1}} {{bar percent|Catholicism|purple|6.24}} {{bar percent|Islam|green|3.42}} {{bar percent|Protestantism|yellow|1.44}} |caption = }}
to
{{Bar box | title=Serbia <small>(excluding Kosovo)</small> religiosity (2002) | titlebar=#ddd | float=right | bars= {{Bar percent|Orthodoxy|blue|85}} {{Bar percent|Catholicism|purple|5.5}} {{Bar percent|Islam|green|3}} {{Bar percent|Undeclared|yellow|2.5}} {{Bar percent|Others|grey|2.5}} {{Bar percent|Protestantism|orange|1}} {{Bar percent|Irreligion|red|0.5}} |caption=<small>source: [http://webrzs.stat.gov.rs/axd/en/popis.htm 2002 census]</small> }}
and
to
With regards, 178.223.198.96 (talk) 14:14, 31 July 2012 (UTC)
Not done: Changes are minor. A request template is not needed. You may ask at help desk for minor changes such as this.--Canoe1967 (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
Mistake
How can you calculate correct the density, if area includes Kosovo, and the population does not?--Strower (talk) 18:53, 24 October 2012 (UTC)
Edit request on 12 November 2012
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serbia 109.73.111.29 (talk) 12:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:24, 12 November 2012 (UTC)
new/old threat to Serbian security?
http://abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/vampire-loose-serbia-17854740#.ULoQLo7ffe4
- -)
Actually, should go to the Wiki articles on vampires and folklore. But carry some holy water anyway.HammerFilmFan (talk) 14:56, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
?
Area field includes Kosovo, but population field does not. Why?--Strower (talk) 17:37, 15 February 2013 (UTC)
- Serbian sources probably do not have reliable figures for Kosovo's population as it has not been under their control for over a decade. Using Serbian sources for the population of Vojvodina and the rest of Serbia and adding Kosovan figures for the population of Kosovo would constitute original research on our part. --Khajidha (talk) 13:29, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
Geographical mistake
Geographical mistake is made by defining Serbian borders, because Serbia is where Serbs are, so borders of Serbia should be from Tokio to Milwaukee. English language is just a small subdialect of Serbian language. So such mistakes should be corrected. Serbs all and everyway.
- ^ Hudson, Alexandra (26 February 2007). "Serbia cleared of genocide, failed to stop killing". Reuters.
- ^ ICJ:Summary of the Judgment of 26 February 2007 – Bosnia v. Serbia
- ^ Court Declares Bosnia Killings Were Genocide The New York Times, 26 February 2007. A copy of the ICJ judgement can be found here
- WikiProject templates with unknown parameters
- C-Class country articles
- WikiProject Countries articles
- C-Class Serbia articles
- Top-importance Serbia articles
- WikiProject Serbia articles
- C-Class Kosovo articles
- High-importance Kosovo articles
- WikiProject Kosovo articles
- C-Class Belgrade articles
- High-importance Belgrade articles
- WikiProject Serbia/Belgrade articles
- Unassessed software articles
- Unknown-importance software articles
- Unassessed software articles of Unknown-importance
- Unassessed Computing articles
- Unknown-importance Computing articles
- All Computing articles
- All Software articles
- Selected anniversaries (February 2005)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2006)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2007)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2008)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2009)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2010)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2011)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2012)
- Selected anniversaries (February 2013)