User talk:Vinson wese

Vinson wese, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Vinson wese! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 00:09, 6 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Your recent editing history at Emmelie de Forest shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. that source does not meet the guidelines! me and BabbaQ have both reverted your changes several times. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 00:55, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. -- Aunva6^{talk - contribs} 01:09, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Emmelie de Forest. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 01:18, 7 April 2013 (UTC)

When you return

Hello, Vinson wese. When you return from this 3RR block, you are very welcome to edit constructively. In the case of Emmelie de Forest, please keep in mind that you're editing an article about a real person, who may well read it herself. These points from our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy are very important:

Editors must take particular care when adding information about living persons to any Wikipedia page. Such material requires a high degree of sensitivity.

Biographies of living persons ("BLP"s) must be written conservatively and with regard for the subject's privacy. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, not a tabloid: it is not Wikipedia's job to be sensationalist, or to be the primary vehicle for the spread of titillating claims about people's lives: the possibility of harm to living subjects must always be considered when exercising editorial judgment. [My bolding.] Avoid repeating gossip.

Please also read WP:UNDUE and avoid editing Emmelie de Forest as if the subject's claims about royal descent are the central fact about her, and need elaborate treatment in her Wikipedia biography.

Note that any editor may remove negative and poorly sourced material from biography articles (in obvious cases only, naturally), and it will not count as edit warring on their account.

I have speedy deleted your category Category:False claimants of royal descent as serving no other purpose than besmirching the reputation of one individual. Bishonen | talk 13:56, 7 April 2013 (UTC).