Jump to content

User talk:Future Perfect at Sunrise: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 68: Line 68:


Please see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Copernicus mass sockpuppetry]] if you haven't already. I noticed you had blocked Mieszko 8 and given a topic ban to Astronomer28, both of whom are mentioned in that thread. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Please see [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Copernicus mass sockpuppetry]] if you haven't already. I noticed you had blocked Mieszko 8 and given a topic ban to Astronomer28, both of whom are mentioned in that thread. Thanks, [[User:EdJohnston|EdJohnston]] ([[User talk:EdJohnston|talk]]) 04:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

== Topic Ban Appeal and Arbitration ==

I have filed an appeal and requested arbitration of my topic ban at [[WP:AE#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_astronomer28|WP:AE]]. [[User:Astronomer28|Astronomer28]] ([[User talk:Astronomer28|talk]]) 05:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 05:01, 12 April 2013

Hello, Future Perfect at Sunrise. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Archive
Archives

Note: If you leave a message here I will most often respond here

Re: File:MIT ESG lizard mural with red lizard.jpg

What's the unambiguous copyright violation? This is a mural in a public space at MIT, and students in the ESG program consider these lizards to be their unofficial symbol. It was painted by a group of anonymous students as a group project at ESG some years back, so the creator is not available to ask for permission. I will try to get the ESG administrator's permission if you would find that satisfactory, but in any case, the photo we took represents only a small portion of the entire mural, and should therefore OK under "fair use."

Syed Abul Hossain Biography

Hello, this is hossaine. I appreciate your work and I know my posted biography wasn't neutral point of view. Cause to be honest I'm working on his Company named Sahco and found Mr. Syed Abul Hossain CV and just posted few content same to same. Now I realize what to do. Next time I will be neutral. Thank You — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hossaine (talkcontribs) 17:10, January 30, 2013‎ (UTC)

RE: Policeman Adrian Donohoe

Hey, I see my photos File:Picture of Detective Garda Adrian Donohoe with Garda police jacket and weapon.jpg and File:Picture of car used in murder of Detective Garda Adrian Donohoe.jpg were an 'Unambiguous copyright violation', are you sure they cannot be used on wiki because they are in the public domain and publicly available, as was explained. Anyway, if not, no worries.

Also, are you in a position to review my article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Adrian Donohoe ? I sent it for submission over a week ago, and I've put a lot of work in, so I am just wondering if you could review/accept it?

Kind Regards, Eire.

HELLO?...

Maybe self-proclaimed naming and advocacy?

Help please! We're in a bit of a pickle here and here. Thank uou for your brief attention. --Septimus Wilkinson (talk) 00:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note:

I'm not a clerk, so this post carries no weight what-so-ever; still I thought you should know per a NYB request that you have been mentioned. My guess is that he is referring to this statement at the AC case request, but I can not be positive of any person's thinking other than my own. Just letting you know though. — Ched :  ?  00:42, 3 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AE

Hi, there is a request at WP:AE about an editor you sanctioned and who is alleged to have violated the sanction. Your input would be useful, I think.  Sandstein  04:58, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Article requiring protection

Hi Future Perfect Sunrise, I was wondering if you could assist in Hellenic Police article. There is this user who, under different IP's (not auto-confirmed user), constantly changes (adding non-sense) the article. I don't think he will stop. Can you protect the page please? Thanks. Nochoje (talk) 18:29, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bobrayner issue

Hello. I feel bad that I have immediately been labelled "tendentious" per the statement I made at AN/I following yours. Either way, all that was being typed out while the other noticeboard thread was being created. I know that the material I posted is not the kind of thing sought on that page but there is more to editing than simply assuming "my source is better than his" hence the reason we have agreement, resolution and consensus. To that end, I outlined the entire exchange which tomorrow celebrates one year since making its first appearance. See not only how I am one of three editors to approve a revision contested by one person only inside a year, but that no valid argument has ever been given for an absolute blanking. Redacting/copyediting maybe but blanking, certainly not. Please see the list before concluding who is tendentious and whether Boomerang is necessary[1]. Thank you. Evlekis (Евлекис) (argue) 08:08, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Talk:Byzantine Empire#The intro sentence

You are invited to join the discussion at Talk:Byzantine Empire#The intro sentence.  —Sowlos  13:36, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Template:Z48[reply]

Personal attacks

Please do try commenting on content, rather than the contributors. Your opinions recently posted at Talk:Byzantine Empire are not without merit, but — as a long standing administrator — you should be well aware of the unproductive results that can stem from name calling and the like.[1]  —Sowlos  19:54, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Complaint about Copernicus socks at ANI

Please see Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Copernicus mass sockpuppetry if you haven't already. I noticed you had blocked Mieszko 8 and given a topic ban to Astronomer28, both of whom are mentioned in that thread. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 04:27, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Topic Ban Appeal and Arbitration

I have filed an appeal and requested arbitration of my topic ban at WP:AE. Astronomer28 (talk) 05:01, 12 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  1. ^ "Sigh. Another semi-illiterate who doesn't know how to use quotation signs. No, for chrissake, Byzantium wasn't a term. "Byzantium" is a term. Learn what quotation signs are there for, at last. Sowlos, thanks for at least admitting that you have now grasped the application of the use-mention distinction. ..."