User talk:Til Eulenspiegel

New User Talk Page Started 27 May 2013

(all archives are on the View history tab. They are not being archived a second time, to save bandwidth. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 16:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC))

Henricus

Please note that I reverted your edit. Currently, Henricus is on the NRHP list for Henrico county but not for Chesterfield county. I have no knowledge of the subject, but we should be consistent. If it is in Chesterfield county, it should also be on the Chesterfield county NRHP list.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:35, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

I see that you reverted me again. Then please correct the lists.--Ymblanter (talk) 20:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

There's no doubt about it, Henricus is still in Chesterfield County, and any sources saying it is in Henrico County are erroneous. Or perhaps dated older than 1749. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 20:38, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Taken to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places#Henricus.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited West Virginia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Blue Ridge (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

"according to these self-declared authorities"

You know that [1] was unacceptable as was the IP's earlier edit that you endorsed. I'm sure you know about WP:POINT. Dougweller (talk) 16:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

Easy does it

Hi, TE. I'd regret seeing you get blocked over something so unimportant. Check out WP:BLANKING and you'll see what I mean. Regards Tiderolls 22:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

I should have payed closer attention, I thought he had blanked out his block notification yet again. I doubt anyone wants to block me for reverting that, though. Til Eulenspiegel /talk/ 01:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

discussion alert

Hi Til, Knowing your interest in dealing with bias on WP, I thought you might like to know about a discussion currently going on at Talk:Humiliation of Christ, where the issue revolves around how widely a doctrine is held within the "Protestant" tradition. The claim is that it encompasses all of Protestantism, while the question is asked if or how far it goes beyond just Calvinism, the possible bias then being whether or not the claim is overreaching. I for one would like to see a wider engagement among interested editors. If you'd like to watch or participate, I would welcome it. Thanks, Evenssteven (talk) 17:39, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/International Council of 13 Indigenous Grandmothers

Hi there. Take a look at my two sets of arguments - the first holistic and subjective, and the second (post scriptum) more rationalist and objective. At Wikipedia, most editors have formed a strong consensus that published sources, such as books and newspapers, matter more than the Old Wisdom, which I think is the whole point of the Grandmother's movement. However, we must work with what we have. Good luck! Bearian (talk) 17:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)

Removing reliable sources with accusations

[2] I suggest you not to do that. --46.239.60.21 (talk) 19:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)