Talk:The Karate Kid Part II

Fair use rationale for Image:Karate kid part II.jpg

Image:Karate kid part II.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:17, 1 October 2007 (UTC)

Possible Goofs

Is this a goof? Wouldn't Chozen's use of hollow weights benefit the seller (the villagers) and not the buyer? For example, the villagers would be selling 10 pounds of carrots to Chozen, but in reality only giving him 8 pounds because the 10 pound weight only weighs 8 pounds. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrsirjojo (talk • contribs) 17:37, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

I believe you are correct. This should be pointed out, and maybe should be added to the trivia section or be in a goofs section. 2S 21:29, 27 October 2007 (UTC)2S

Unless a reliable source points that out, we cannot put it into the article. As editors, our opinions outside of plot summaries are not usable as sources. - Jack Sebastian (talk) 13:28, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Chozen is a coward

Could it be interpreted that Chozen didn't help Daniel because he is afraid? During the typhoon he seemed reluctant to help Daniel because of the perilous situation than anything else. He also didn't go back to help his uncle. So could it be that the entire movie with Chozen calling Daniel a coward, that he was the actual coward? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.236.216.155 (talk) 07:22, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Chozen is afraid and showing his cowardice, yes. But I believe the real point of the scene was to reinforce that Chozen is the atypical bully. The atypical bully is a coward at heart who very typically has little to no honor. As long as their in control everything is great. But whenever that control is taken from them their reaction is either one of fear or out right cowardice depending on just how badly they don't have control of the situation. Chozen's facing two elements of a loss of control during the typoon, the loss of his sponsor and the typhoon itself. Consider how often movies and TV series will depict the atypical bully as always working for someone more powerful, this person is what I'm calling their sponsor; their usually the person who gives the atypical bully their power and sense of control. If the sponsor becomes incapacitated, killed, or believed to be dead then the atypical bully is already going to have a reason to be afraid. In Chozen's case, his uncle Sato is his sponsor and when his dojo collapse on him Chozen, like the atypical bully he is, views this to mean he's dead. Without his sponsor and without any sense of control because of the storm Chozen resorts to the basic atypical bully nature of cowardice. This also means that he is going to view Daniel's actions as dishonoring him rather than admitting it is his own actions that are bringing him dishonor. -anonymous 10/12/2013 10:17 PM EST