User talk:Jim1138: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
m Signing comment by 71.126.48.31 - ""
Line 343: Line 343:


its all over the web it needs to be sited and added <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.126.48.31|71.126.48.31]] ([[User talk:71.126.48.31|talk]]) 04:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
its all over the web it needs to be sited and added <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/71.126.48.31|71.126.48.31]] ([[User talk:71.126.48.31|talk]]) 04:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:Unsigned IP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->

== Accountancy page - Need international and morden stuff at the end. ==

Well the accountancy page refers to the other wikipediapages that the text refers to. Especially I have given a number of pages like invoice and receipt the references to the European union VAT tax directive regulations of these topics. There I have made the external link to the directive text itself. But it is so indirect that it is enough there. For many people in accpounting business the fact that the tax reports are what sets the content in accounting is hard to accept, but it is the fact.

The other texts like that of SIE, XBRL and UN/CEFACT is what is going on today and the development of the work condistions and life as accountant and audit dealing with accantancy and those refers to other wikipedia articles specifically of them. The deveopment of accounting the last 25 years in Europe and especially Sweden that is by far the leadoing nation in compurerised accounting WW is blank on the page.

The stuff of "Accounting in the internet era" is really poor and if you think the development of accounting ended in 1887 the article is out of date.

Please considder moving my text back, please devlop it instead.

I prefere not logging in of personal integrity reasons, if the Wikipedoia wtachdogs like what I write its fine, if not there is nothing I can do in anyway.

But please do not have such a US dominent page of such a common thing WW as accounting?

Revision as of 07:29, 13 November 2013

Welcome!


Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

You wrote me to stop disruptive editing. I am the one who put up the wiki page to my images of signatures. My competitors kept changing all of the links to their webpages for advertizing. I changed it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miraluck (talkcontribs)

JRTN

I removed what you said I removed because there are no sources to back that piece of information and is rather biased.

Clearly out of date and biased since there has not been any instance of Al-Douri advocating for separation of Iraq into Sunni and Shia only states.

Thanks for fixing, and there is a mistake on your userpage

Hi Jim! First of all, thanks for reverting vandalism, I really appreciate that! Secondly, your userpage states 'states lived in', with American states. That implies you live(d) in the USA. However, 'countries lived in' does not state so. Mistake? :P

Greetings! Jarvix (talk) 19:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I presume that you mean it is rather USA-centric? I reworded it to be somewhat less so. I lived in Maharashtra state while in India. I don't think Bougainville Island had states. Thanks for pointing this out. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User: 113.23.129.9

Hello, I saw that you commented on this user's edits on Hin Hua High School, I am relatively new to the whole reporting vandlism game, but to me her edits seemed very much in bad faith and were false, uncited and potentially libelous.Snood1205 (talk) 04:36, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not that bad. The English edit seems rather silly. I can't read the Chinese? edit. Just undo it and warn the editor. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 04:42, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sir Digby Chicken Caesar

I am sorry. I did not realise there was a sandbox. Please explain what is a sandbox? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Llllaaaaammmmaaaa (talkcontribs)

Replied on user's talk page Jim1138 (talk) 06:57, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GeoffH_112SU

Thank you for your very quick spot. This was probably an error but I haven't yet leant how to have or maintain multiple Sandboxes and wanted to set up a new one.GeoffH 112SU (talk) 08:16, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion; I copied in how you have implemented links in your page and now I have to learn how to add pages to my user page...GeoffH 112SU (talk) 09:41, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Joe Heck

A company called ITM had posted an ad for their services in the top section of Congressman Joe Heck's page. That is all that I deleted; I would not consider that 'disruptive editing.' — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.184.10 (talk) 15:55, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Much obliged! I'm a newbie to the editing, but I'll keep the summary in mind in the event that I run across something similar in the future. Have a good day! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.51.184.10 (talk) 16:14, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Jns4eva's talk page.
Message added 04:44, 21 October 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jns4eva (talk) 04:44, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Undecidable problem

I think you made a mistake by reverting my change in the link of a line "While most infinite loops can be found by close inspection of the code, there is no general method to determine whether a given program will ever halt or will run forever; this is the undecidability of the halting problem." in the "Infinete loop" article. This sentence clearly refers specificly to Undecidable problem that is a subcategory of the decision problem and not to decision problems in general, it was laborous to find information about undecibility from that article. Also "Undecidable problem" article refers to "Decision problem" at the very begining so that if the reader does not understand the term he or she can check that out easily.37.136.56.173 (talk) 09:23, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Please check it: 25-May-2013 7 JF World Masters Tyumen: [1][2] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.160.6.0 (talk) 09:31, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of laser applications may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ).
  • Mid-Infrared Advanced Chemical Laser]] (MIRACL) A [[United States Navy|U.S. Navy]] experimental [[Hydrogen fluoride laser|deuterium fluoride laser]. Was tested against an [[United States Air Force|

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:19, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BQ Puzzle

Jim, I apologize for placing my link inappropriately on the Mathematical puzzles page. I wasn't aware of the strict policies in place. I would like to add a link to my math puzzle if possible. In order to proceed appropriately, would I need to go through you? If not, can you please let me know what source I would need to go through? Wmcmahan (talk) 22:11, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on Wmcmahan's talk page Jim1138 (talk) 00:09, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

what is your f*cking problem?

these crap is full of false info I'm just helping — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.254.134.15 (talk) 07:45, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BLP

Hi Jim, I wanted to let you know I reverted your edit here, as the information is negative and unsourced, and it's in a WP:BLP. Best, SpencerT♦C 08:46, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I thought I was removing it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:49, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Haha oh woops. I've also removed the AIV report in that case. SpencerT♦C 09:07, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revert

Why the Revert on the korma article? See the image description in commons.--عبد المؤمن (talk) 10:51, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cuffaro is a mafia convicted fellow

hi Jim,

I was just trying to update the info-box ... Salvatore Cuffaro is actually serving a 7 year mafia conviction at Rebibbia Prison. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.112.193.20 (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Updates to Jehad Muntasser page

Hi Jim,

Hope all is well. Thanks for clarifying the process of updating the 'Jehad Muntasser' page. I will go ahead and re-add the section you removed about the charity event and will this time list references that verify the facts. Please also find below some of the references on the topic of the 'Friends of Libya's Children' charity event that was hosted in Dubai and organized by Jehad Muntasser:

- http://www.thenational.ae/news/uae-news/football-legends-hold-charity-match-for-injured-libyan-children - http://gulfnews.com/sport/football/a-beautiful-game-soured-by-silence-1.927228

I'd also like to clarify one section of the page that mentions a transfer without giving the reason of the injury that caused that transfer, kindly find below an reference on that behalf.

- http://sport.repubblica.it/news/sport/calcio-treviso-anche-muntasser-va-ko/1124096

Thanks for the help Jim and if you need me to clarify or find more sources for you please don't hesitate to let me know. Regards,

Jehadm78 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jehadm78 (talkcontribs) 15:02, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User: 175.181.43.117 MinGW

I does not provide a source because I just fixed a typo. It should be "Objective-C", not "Object-C". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.181.43.117 (talk) 06:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I replaced your edit. I apologize. I goggled "Objective-C", but must have mistyped as no hits. Thanks for letting me know and fixing that in the first place. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:22, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About changes on Safidon page

Hi, First of all, I'm sorry for using external links on the page. I respect the rules of wikipedia. but sir, i was used that for 1st edit only that was reverted by you... but in my next edit i was not used any external links... then why you removed my changes ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.55.121 (talkcontribs)

Very simple, no advertising on Wikipedia, no phone numbers or email addresses. I removed another set of contact info from Safidon Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:02, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
ok... i understand that. but sir, that was just to describe the more detailed info about the places in Safidon... I was going to add some government offices info also... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.55.121 (talk) 06:07, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fine to add info. Do remember, Wikipedia is not meant to be a directory. May I suggest using similar format with other towns? If the town is small, the article probably should be small. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 06:14, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
its ok sir, i will never edit/add on wikipedia... bless you all... good bye... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.207.55.121 (talk) 06:22, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Brian LaWan Alexander

Can you help assist me with this process Jim1138 CJ904563 (talk) 09:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Why are Wikipedians Harsh About Moderating Now

Honesty, I make like two bad edits (AS A JOKE) and you assholes feel the need to near ban me and edit my talk page. I thought this was an American website with the right to Free Speech.

Maybe you're a Godless Commie, but I would appreciate you not forcing your twisted worldview on Wikipedia.MrEchelon (Talk! Stalk?) 19:28, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you the original owner of the account, or have you "borrowed" it? Jamesx12345 19:48, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I don't see how we're being strict. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and articles are to be written in a formal tone. Think of vandalising as making jokes at a business convention - I feel we're being very lenient to let you have four warnings before you were blocked. Darylgolden(talk) 06:02, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Six in fact. Darylgolden(talk) 06:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Spam

Just a heads up, 117.215.210.254 (talk • contribs • deleted contribs • blacklist hits • AbuseLog • what links to user page • COIBot • Spamcheck • count • block log • x-wiki • Edit filter search • WHOIS • RDNS • tracert • robtex.com • StopForumSpam • Google • AboutUs • Project HoneyPot) is part of a mass sockfarm that spams articles with links to the "getinfo" website. See [3] for details. -SFK2 (talk) 07:47, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

don't understand why my edits were auto removed

Please tell me why, and where are the texts of my edits, so I can re-submit them

Nambephill (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't Jim but: your edits weren't written in an encyclopedic tone. Please read the Manual of Style. Thanks! Darylgolden(talk) 05:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
More specifically, please read this, information should be written in a formal or business-like tone, not a magazine-ish type of tone. Darylgolden(talk) 05:59, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of diplomatic missions of Slovakia,

Hello Jim, I removed Slovak embassy from Malaysia, Lybia and Los Angeles in List of diplomatic missions of Slovakia, because they closed them already. In Malaysia is Slovak embassy closed from January. In Lybia from 2011 and in Los Angeles from this September.

Peter — Preceding unsigned comment added by 110.168.207.28 (talk) 05:44, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stimulsoft Reports

I have removed some prducts because they are discontinued. Sorry, I forgot to explain this. I will leave comments in future. 178.126.6.215 (talk) 07:26, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't me.

Hello Jim1138. I did not make that edit, due to me never actually being on that page. This might have been a troll, or someone who thought they were clever. I'm sorry if you thought this was me. Nice edit, nonetheless. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 217.65.237.149 (talk) 09:09, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FGM

Hey Jim, I tried to re-edit the section with refuting information of what was written on the FGM article on Arabic Wikipedia and it wasn't approved again.

Do you have any ideas that could help?Mohamed 12:45, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Have you tried opening a discussion on a notice board? Perhaps the equivalent of Wikipedia:Requests for mediation or Wikipedia:Village pump? Be sure to have a few (don't overcite) exemplary references supporting your arguments maybe a cite criticizing the FGM references of those supporting FGM. Probably the more public the better. You might try to find other examples of policy that were changed and how that happened. Mention a fatwā or two regarding FGM, perhaps? Jim1138 (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Beyonce Knowles discovery

http://thatgrapejuice.net/2013/05/beyonces-4-soars-uk-top-30two-years-release/

Thanks Gaknowitall (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That link should be added at the time of your Knowles edit. It doesn't help much on my page. Jim1138 (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

About changing the Atrizia thing

I understand why you edited what I wrote. I just wanted to see if it would work, really. Never really knew how wikipedia worked until now.. It's pretty cool. Sorry for bothering! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.101.57 (talk) 08:54, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Dear Jim1138 in Greek the last “s” is “ς” not z=ζ. See the greek version…. In many times we do not put neither “s” to the end... THNKS--2.86.7.99 (talk) 09:03, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I could not understand why you changed it to "Νεχώς Β"? seen on this edit. Please leave an wp:edit summary before you save your edit. Please do change it back. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:47, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Shouldn't that be "Νεχώς β" or "β Νεχώς", the Greek "β" not the Latin "B"? Jim1138 (talk) 15:30, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Jim1138,

and Πρότυπο:Φαραώ (Template:Pharaohs)--2.86.7.99 (talk) 01:20, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

List of kings of Macedon and Βασιλείς της Μακεδονίας

190.130.168.55 engaged in deletion war

Shall we do anything about it? Dreth 23:54, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dinoponera + ant task force

Thank you for creating the Dinoponera article, it is a really interesting genus (and also thank you for the thank you :)). You should check out the ant tak force, especially this list of open access articles which I used to expand the Dinoponera main article and species articles. Unfortunately/fortunately I've already reused most of the content from the Dinoponera OA article, but there are many more ant-related open access articles in the list you can choose from. Cheers, jonkerztalk 23:50, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You did the vast majority of the work here. I copied it from the French Wikipedia fr:Dinoponera. Translated what little non-Latin there was with Google. Perhaps thank the French author! (Looks like they need their 1910 date changed to 1901.) Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:54, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed! Three years of high-school French finally paid off :) jonkerztalk 01:04, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Attack

You said: "removal of citation", while I have not removed anything. Moreover, it is you that have removed the sourced addition to Attack's page, that I have made. Please check more carefully and avoid edit warring. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 158.58.234.92 (talk) 09:14, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nancy Grace

Jim1138, yes, I did make a change to Nancy Grace's page and no, I did not provide a citation, as many of the edits do not. Is there a specific reason, why my edit without citation was removed?

The edit can be proven, but must be done through a Public Information request in the state which she was a prosecutor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.196.111.68 (talk) 10:31, 9 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unlocker Edits

I would ask that you reconsider your reverts of the edits for Unlocker. I believe if you attempted to actually install the software yourself, you would immediately understand my concerns. I have personally used this piece of software for several years. However, on the most recent installation, it has become infested with unavoidable ad-ware. I believe it is a necessary function of one of the most popular websites on the internet to warn potential software users of what they might be getting in to, especially if it has recently changed.

If you would like to correct my edits to something less inflammatory, then please be my guest. However, I would request that the warning nature of my initial edits remain intact. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.127.12 (talk) 07:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia policy requires that it be verifiable. Find a reliable source then cite it. Destructive verification is not a good idea. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I understand that the need for verifiable sources. However, in the particular case of Unlocker, the verification of its problems is in actually installing it. How can I provide an accurate source for this? Should I create a blog and talk about it? Unfortunately, it seems to be a relatively recent problem, so my Google searches have not turned up other users experiencing similar problems. What is the best way to proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.127.12 (talk) 08:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find an article from PC World or some other magazine that has an article on it? People will want to find the source of the information without having to install Unlocker. One might suspect that you obtained a corrupt version of Unlocker or something. Jim1138 (talk) 08:09, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunately, I think the utility is just small enough to not warrant an article in something like PC World, but useful enough to impact multiple people. I am reasonably confident that I did not download a corrupt version of Unlocker as it is available from the author's website: http://www.emptyloop.com/unlocker/ A Google search turns up several results, but I am not sure if they count as verifiable/reliable: -http://www.wilderssecurity.com/showthread.php?t=248573 - Forum post -http://jamesfriesen.net/archives/99/comment-page-1 - Blog post -http://www.ghacks.net/2012/02/20/how-programs-trick-you-into-installing-adware-on-your-computer/ - Describers another piece of ad-ware in Unlocker that I did not personally encounter

I suppose one question is what made the article noteworthy or verifiable in the first place? It is a simple freeware utility that can be downloaded off of the internet and, up until recently (as far as I know), it was relatively clean. Or, at least, you could install it without ad/spy-ware by clicking the correct options. This no longer seems to be the case. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.127.12 (talk) 08:20, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Primarily avoid self-published sources such as blogs and forums. The reason is that anyone can put much of anything without too much fear of repercussions. The ghacks looks like it would fit that. Avoid sounding too biased wp:npov and be mater-of-fact. I'll leave it alone, but others will likely review it. Good luck. Jim1138 (talk) 08:26, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I can appreciate not using self-published sources. However, the origin of the article seems to be a self-published source, so how can I respond? It is especially problematic as it is a small-but-useful utility, apparently popular enough to warrant a Wikipedia article, but not large enough to warrant a response from a software reviewer such as Ars Technica or PC World. It is possible they covered it at some point, but its inclusion of software is a recent development. What can I do in this situation? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.228.127.12 (talk) 08:34, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
You re referring to Ghacks? Presumably, ghacks has vetted the information and, as any news publisher would be, are putting their reputation on the line regarding the accuracy of their news. So, unless I am missing something, Ghacks should be reputable. I would say this fulfills the wp:v and wp:rs requirements. Thanks for asking. Jim1138 (talk) 08:39, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The bitcoin entry

Jim,

Thanks for the prompt response. I thought the page needed a reference link to show the reader how one might interact with a bitcoin entity. At this early stage of bitcoins' development it is very significant that this new currency is being started on a face to face basis. Although there are ATM's on the way, historically i think it will be very remarkable, especially for business historians, to see the grass roots level of growth needed to give this new currency a start. Would it be ok to leave this entry as is? Or, were there other coding mistakes that I made?

I appologize for the entry about phenomenolgy. After I was complete I didn't notice any error messages, so I didn't think to check back. Is there something I missed on the code side of the entry?

Thanks again, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginot (talkcontribs) 07:57, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Linking to a website that has a "buy" button is generally considered spam except in special cases of references per wp:elno. You might be able to work it in using citations. It would be best to link to a reliable source that discusses the matter rather than the local bitcoin site. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 08:06, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Is my edit currently on hold? Can I look into this change at a future date? Something tells me it is going to take a day or two to peruse the links you sent me. Thanks again, Eric — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ginot (talkcontribs)

You can change it any time. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:58, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Word of Mouth (The Wanted album), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Target (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quentin Crisp edit

"Homophobic" is a senseless word that's thrown around indiscriminately these days with no proof or even evidence of the supposed "homophobic" assertion given.

70.189.80.67 (talk) 10:01, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The use of the term "homophobic" makes sense to me. It makes the article more clear. Jim1138 (talk) 10:12, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TYpoon

da patti nayite mone hello sorry for disturbance

Rohith K P Page deletion

Rohith K P page dont have any reference and all the information provided there is blunder. that was some friends plot against him to insult him. Personal harrasment and insulting.Civilinformer (talk) 09:15, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have given {db-g3} WP:CSD#G3 (Pure vandalism and blatant hoaxes) for the article Rohit Kp. This page also a copy paste of MammootyCivilinformer (talk) 09:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the information and help provided, I am new to this wiki manners and procedures so bear with me till I get into the pace (trust me a I am a quick learner) :) Civilinformer (talk) 09:51, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

google daddy warbux newest aftermath artist

cant figure how to site it

soundboynation.com pushaudio.net hnhh.com

its all over the web it needs to be sited and added — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.126.48.31 (talk) 04:26, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Accountancy page - Need international and morden stuff at the end.

Well the accountancy page refers to the other wikipediapages that the text refers to. Especially I have given a number of pages like invoice and receipt the references to the European union VAT tax directive regulations of these topics. There I have made the external link to the directive text itself. But it is so indirect that it is enough there. For many people in accpounting business the fact that the tax reports are what sets the content in accounting is hard to accept, but it is the fact.

The other texts like that of SIE, XBRL and UN/CEFACT is what is going on today and the development of the work condistions and life as accountant and audit dealing with accantancy and those refers to other wikipedia articles specifically of them. The deveopment of accounting the last 25 years in Europe and especially Sweden that is by far the leadoing nation in compurerised accounting WW is blank on the page.

The stuff of "Accounting in the internet era" is really poor and if you think the development of accounting ended in 1887 the article is out of date.

Please considder moving my text back, please devlop it instead.

I prefere not logging in of personal integrity reasons, if the Wikipedoia wtachdogs like what I write its fine, if not there is nothing I can do in anyway.

But please do not have such a US dominent page of such a common thing WW as accounting?