User talk:Jim1138/Archive 9

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

Archive 8

Archive 9

Archive 10

Archive 11

→

Archive 15

List of programs broadcast by Nick Jr.

Why did you put the show that is coming to Nick Jr? They're are not gonna show it on september 3. It's trash — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.249.147 (talk) 03:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I undid your edit as you did not leave an wp:edit summary which lets people know why you removed what you did. As many people do similar things to vandalize pages, try to let people know that you are not vandalizing by leaving a meaningful reason on the edit summary. A link to the current show line up would be quite helpful to check the verifiablity (please read) of the changes. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 03:27, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

What if the shows not coming to nick jr. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.10.249.147 (talk) 03:37, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

If you have a link to a website where you are getting that information, please add it to the page. Maybe something like <ref>[http://www.nickjr.com/New_shows Nick jr new shows]</ref> (not the correct link btw) Then, when you remove the content, put "Updated page to current source: Nick jr new shows". That way people can check for themselves and your edits less likely to be removed. Good luck Jim1138 (talk) 03:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For the revert on my page. So sad that that sort of hatred appears to be a part of that IP's inherent personality. Ian.thomson (talk) 03:36, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

External Link - XML firewall

Hi Jim, Please let me know why you removed an external link I added to the page XML firewall. The link I added similar to the existing links, but the offer is from a different vendor. Thank you, Jimmy — Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.48.37.201 (talk) 04:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing out the other spam links which I just removed. If you see more, let me know! See wp:el for external link policy. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 04:24, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

category:genetically modified organism to category:ARTIFICIAL MUTANT

I am a genetically modified organism. I am not an artificial mutant.

I demand that you address my claim of being a genetically modified organism. I am a modification of my parents, and because of recessive genes, I am different from both of them.

You are being disruptive for curtailing a simplification of terms.

142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Drop your threat or curtail your activity! 142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:11, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Here is where to file the complaint Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents Jim1138 (talk) 05:16, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I am not an artificial mutant. Nice try. Complaints on noticeboards disappear. You hav been interfering with precision, which iz disruptive in an organization that prides itself on English skills. I am a genetic modification of my parents, and owing to recessive genes, I am different from both. I am a product of selective breeding, which wuz the choice of my parents, therefore I am a GMO in literal terms. I am not an artificial mutant. The only thing that stops me from putting User:Jim1138 into :category:GMO is that GMO haz been defined az something other than what it literally is. I am not an artificial mutant. 142.59.48.238 (talk) 15:03, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

You hav one hour to produce administrative dissent with my simplification of language.142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:20, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

ANDi iz an artificial mutant. Genetically Modified Organism is a weasel term. 142.59.48.238 (talk) 05:30, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Vegetarians and nonviolence ethics

Yes, the source is wikipedia list of vegetarians. see - even Jesus and apostles were vegetarians... yes, I'll add a link there for a whole list (those Hitler is non-veg - he killed many saints and vegetarians - there is a proof that he killed, sentenced to death oldest European vegetarian union in Germany.

Here it is: List of vegetarians

I want to make a small version of the list, so people know who are vegetarians and don't kill animals in name of religion culture etc... Even Bible says - "do not kill, flesh and blood - do not eat"... but people have so many slaughterhouses... see? — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoGandhi (talk • contribs) 09:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

I seee. My task is as tough as that of Gandhi. He wanted to stop wars and animal killing, and Gandhi was killed. So you wanna kill me man? THan you'll go to prison and hell, sorry — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoGandhi (talk • contribs) 09:18, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Man are you crazy? I myself added those content to vegetarianism navbox. You might go and take rest, I think your brain is working bad. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoGandhi (talk • contribs) 09:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

The subject of the articles you added the template to mostly have little to do with vegetarianism. Issac Newton, while an occasional vegetarian and an absolute genius in some areas, would make an amusing spokesperson for a vegetarian movement. Would you really want to list him as a vegetarian? Your username and this leads to the conclusion that you are pushing your own agenda. See WP:NOTPROMOTION. Your addition of the File:Cannibals.23232.jpg image does not contribute to the topic, is intended to gross people out, and is vandalism. Why not add File:penis.jpg or something similar? You really see yourself as Gandhi? Also, is your language above in line with Gandhi? Perhaps you should change your user name to something more appropriate? I could suggest a few. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:07, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the cleanup

Thanks for the immediate revert of the blanking of my Ananny sock page here. I put that page up for my own use because I was surprised to notice recently that Ananny material was being deindexed, and even deleted under OTRS. It didn't take Ananny long to find it, but I didn't expect anyone else to notice it. Meters (talk) 19:38, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Ahmer Jamil Khan's talk page.
Message added 09:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Ahmer Jamil Khan (talk) 09:36, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

RE:Theonering article

Save it where it was.THEY WERE DRUNK AND I saw it on stickam — Preceding unsigned comment added by 120.149.16.13 (talk) 09:10, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Good start

Alumni pruning went well just now at St Stepeh's. What do you think about removing all that are not explicitly cited in accordance with the tag {{alumni}}? Fiddle Faddle (talk) 11:28, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Using wp:huggle, I see someone add to the list then check the list for red links. Need a tool that removes red links from the lists of people. At least List of Yale University people is longer. Harvard University#Alumni is shorter or at least more compact. I would say that the articles in the list need pruning; and would be an undertaking. I and not really the person to ask, but would probably leave the list alone per wp:lists of people. I would say there are far more important Wikipedia issues anyway. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

~SIghs~ there probably are, but obsession is a wonderful thing! Fiddle Faddle (talk) 18:35, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Robert Fisk

Banhammer exercised. . Mjroots (talk) 08:25, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

If I start talking like that, drill some holes thru my head with a 1-1/4" spade bit? A dull one would be preferable... Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Bangladesh religious statistics (reliable sources)

Hi Jim! I've noticed you're joined the revert-fest over 123.49.18.155's poorly sourced updates to Bangladesh religious composition. I've commented on User Talk:Materialscientist and Talk:Bangladesh. I think there are better numbers, but request comment before BOLDLY editing being reverted and trouted. Thanks! --Robert Keiden (talk) 19:21, 2 September 2012 (UTC)

Image spam?

Good morning, Jim. I see that you have reverted an image addition by User:Jared Kofsky here with the comment "rv overuse of image". This new editor is adding his photos to hundreds of articles, in many cases repetitively, with little or no regard to relevance, subject or caption notability or the quality of the photos. Can you advise me as to whether there is a policy being violated? I would like to give him a warning and slow down this onslaught. I wouldn't regard it as deliberate vandalism, but for the most part it is not beneficial to WP. I am unable to keep up with the reversions and modifications needed, and other than you, I don't see anyone else helping. I will watch here for a reply. Thank you. Hertz1888 (talk) 08:05, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Try talking to him. He does seem a bit overenthusiastic. There is Template:Uw-image1 and Template:Uw-disruptive1, but a "I think you are putting these photos on too many pages..." would be by far the best place to start. Jim1138 (talk) 08:12, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. I will try that, though I would rather be able to cite a specific prohibition that applies to such a situation. Hertz1888 (talk) 08:25, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

There are so many ways you can "do it wrong" that it would seem unlikely to be set in policy. A list: Wikipedia:Images#See also Could suggest s/he join Wikipedia:WikiProject Images and Media Jim1138 (talk) 08:37, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

That too is helpful. I have left a message, and we shall see whether it stems the tide. Best wishes, Hertz1888 (talk) 09:06, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your great contributions on reverting vandalism. Keep up the good work. Torreslfchero (talk) 09:41, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Incorrect correction

I attempted to update the album information on AC/DC's wiki page, as it was incorrect. I own a copy of their album T.N.T. which was the Australian release in 1975, prior to the U.S. compilation album High Voltage in 1976. I was accused of being incorrect and making "unconsstructive edits", which I take offence to. What is going on?

__

It's a bot. It blocks people if it's bored or horny.. No — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.205.143.144 (talk) 13:52, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Flipkart

Hi Jim,

I have been editing Wikipedia articles for some time but I am not as proficient as you are. I have noticed that you deleted the "issues and problems" section I have added to Flipkart. I have two questions to ask regarding this. 1. The source I have quoted there is from a publication on a business and entrepreneurship blog that has been running for the last five years. I understand that linking to a blog might not be acceptable to Wiki standards. If that is the case, there are other references in the article that link to blogs like this one <http://www.watblog.com/2012/08/08/flipkart-hits-100cr-mark-in-july-2012-while-flyte-garners-600k-downloads-in-5-months/> too, which should have been deleted in the same vein. May I know if it is fine to add blogs when the tone is positive but not so when the section of article is critical of the subject. 2. I also observed that the whole section of "issues and problems" was deleted, after removing the link. If the tone of article was wrong, a suggestion to correct it, based on Wikipedia:Neutral_point_of_view would have helped, rather than deleting the entire section, effectively killing the criticism.Thank you. Dsrivallabha (talk) 16:26 IST, 3 September 2012. —Preceding undated comment added 10:57, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Jim, I hope you don't mind me replying instead. Dsrivallabha, as far as I know, we don't add "criticism" sections unless a reputed newspaper or news agency reports it. Thank you. Ryoga Godai (talk) 14:14, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Stelios Constantas

Hello iam Stelios Constantas and i dont need a source!!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.109.6.229 (talk) 20:38, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi, Stelios .. Well, yes, you do need a source, we have no way of insuring you are Stelios. Everything on Wikipedia is subject to our five pillars, which includes WP:V. However, the one source already in the article does in fact use a C, and not a K, and I've made the correction. In fact, it's my fault that this wasn't corrected earlier, at some point in the past I added a reference to that article and didn't notice the error. Please note that the error is repeated at the Dutch, German wikipedias and I have not corrected those articles. Our interwiki links therefore should continue to have the "wrong" spelling until those encyclopedias are corrected, so that we at least link to the articles in question. I'm sure that will all get sorted out pretty quick. My apologies for the error. Best, --j⚛e decker^talk 20:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Joe, that was a fast fix. I was about to request a page move. Also added a link to the Eurovision song contest. Jim1138 (talk) 21:01, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

Awesome, thanks! --j⚛e decker^talk 21:03, 3 September 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	Thanks for your hard work specially when using HG to revert vandalism on Wikipedia:STiki! That gave me a laugh xD -- Cheers, Riley Huntley talk 02:10, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Television Ratings removed due to violation of copyright

Posted television ratings (2001 - 2012) to these pages are copyright to OzTAM Pty Ltd and need to be removed. The previous years' data is not copyright to OzTAM. Spencer Anne (talk) 07:27, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Mr. Wikipediania's talk page.
Message added 09:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mr.Wikipediania (Stalk • Talk) 09:17, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Please see this discussion

Please see this discussion:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:125.205.77.232#Cancellation_of_vandalism_which_...

JoshuSasori (talk) 08:48, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

This business with Akira Takarada started again. You don't need to notify me of actions. JoshuSasori (talk) 07:33, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

It would appear that he is Jaffa and Rattigan on the Japanese language DVD per references 4, 5, & 6 which are Disney Japan reference. Perhaps it should be mentioned that role is the Japanese language dub. I will leave it as-is. Jim1138 (talk) 07:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

He was removing it before, now is adding it back. I'm confused. I requested another block and added his Block history in Japan. Jim1138 (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Worst admin ever

	Failure
	You are such a worst admin Playtime94 (talk) 09:39, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I may be the worst admin ever, but at least I've been promoted to admin! Do I get to display the mop now? Jim1138 (talk) 09:41, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

(talk page stalker)Yeah Jim, you are such a worst admin! Haha... Oh that one's gold! -- MST☆R ^{(Chat Me!)} 11:14, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

I suppose that mean we give you a bucket, but no mop. I like it, the power of the Huggle. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 11:25, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Classic :D And I came here to thank you for dealing with the LOLs on my talk page by a sockpuppet of someone I blocked (a lot of it sounded like "I fart in your general direction! Your mother was a hamster and your father smelt of elderberries!" kind of trolling) Orderinchaos 10:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Deletion

HI.....I WAS DELETED WITH SOME CONTRIBUTION ABOUT CHILEAN PUNKS BANDS...I KNOW BETTER BECAUSE I PLAY IN SQUAD, THE QUINTESENTIAL CHILEAN CROSSOVER PUNK BAND. WE STARTED EVRYTHING HERE..SO A NEUTRAL?..I DO NOT UNDERSTAND — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris squad (talk • contribs) 19:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

This is an encyclopedia, putting flamboyant words such as "most influential" is not in an encyclopedic tone and should be avoided also the use of all capital letters "MUERTE A LOS HIPPIES" should be avoided. See wp:allcaps. Use "Muerte a los Hippies" instead. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

THANKS JIM..I UNDERSTAND..BUT NOW I'M AFRAID TO ADD SOME VALUABLE INFORMATION ANYMORE — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chris squad (talk • contribs) 20:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Feel free to post information in the talk page such as talk:Chilean rock and ask others for their opinion on including it in the article. Generally, if you are posting information that benefits your group, it probably should not be put in the article. Peruse wp:five pillars for more info, or feel free to put {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask a question underneath. A volunteer will answer your question on that page. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 22:46, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Factory ship

Umm, would you please review the entry you made here. This is a new user, making his first edit to an article. It seems like a good faith entry to me, even though he failed to provide sources. I'm assuming you hit the wrong button by error. Please correct your entry and apologize to the user, who seems a bit stunned and has stopped editing. Otherwise, it will appear like you have committed some egregious errors, biting new comers, moving straight to a level 4 warning without moving through the intermediate stages, and so on. Thanks. --Epipelagic (talk) 01:51, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Oh... I see he has resumed editing using different accounts. This should have been avoidable. --Epipelagic (talk) 01:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

The problem was with this edit Diff where he removed sourced content and replaced it with contradictory, unsourced content. Seems like POV pushing to me. Big problem brewing? Jim1138 (talk) 01:56, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Not sure why Huggle gave the level 4 warning. Might be due to his COI warning. I apologized and changed it to a level 2. Also queried about the issue. Sorry it took so long, read your comment too fast. Jim1138 (talk) 03:45, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

That's good :) --Epipelagic (talk) 04:04, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you mean by that. --Epipelagic (talk) 07:24, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

edit warring on jewwatch talk page

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

Please stop edit warring and removing other peoples comments as you did on the JewWatch talk page. as you stated yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by WitsBlomstein (talk • contribs) 13:36, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Firstly, you removed content from a closed section (per: wp:NOTFORUM) talk page. Then you added content to the same talk page. I did two reverts to two different items. That is two single reverts: not edit warring not even 1RR let alone 3RR. Stop editing closed sections at is stated at the top of the section. Closed means closed. Do not modify means don't edit. Jim1138 (talk)

Firstly, I restored a comment since you can actually check the history of said article. you removed conent from a closed section. so yes by your own logic you did wrong. and then by simular logic you added content by the same talk page. I did two reverts to two different items. stop editing closed sections and remove conent from a closed discussion as you did with the one I reverted. do not modify means dont edit. you edited.WitsBlomstein (talk) 01:56, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Uh, I restored the content of the closed section as it was before you edited it twice. Once you removed other's comments after the section was closed. The second time, you added content after the section was closed. It would seem that three disagree with you. Jim1138 (talk) 02:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Your correction of a certain re-direct is absolutely accurate and greatly appreciated. For this, I have bought you a beer. Enjoy! Gallion620 (talk) 15:48, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Many unreliable sources say the same thing?

Moved to User talk:68.32.56.94) Jim1138 (talk) 06:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

You got the wrong guy!

Hello, I didn't remove any content from 2012–13 Newcastle United F.C. season. I'm not into football; so, i wouldn't care anyway. -_- Ayushfri13 (talk) 05:04, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Hey, thanks Jim! --Ayushfri13 (talk) 12:14, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Robert Moses Niagara Hydroelectric Power Station article

Jim1138, I completely apologize for my clumsy efforts to enhance the Robert Moses Niagara Hydroelectric Power Station article. I know a great deal about the Niagara Falls operations but very little about Wikipedia, but the best way to learn is to give it a shot. I have added more to the talk section today. I will work on references over time as I can. Please migrate anything to the article when and how you see fit - I will restrict my efforts to just the talk page. I don't know how to go about inviting others to comment and I'm afraid to try and make the kind of mistakes I just did and insult someone, so it would be great if you could ping them to review and comment on what I have so far.

I haven't and don't intend to write anything in any other article and wish to remain anonymous, so I hope my lack of an ID is not a problem (using public wifi that downtown residents all use here). In any case, what I or anyone else writes needs to stand up to verification and logic anyway, regardless of who wrote something.

Thanks for your help and patience! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.11.85.188 (talk) 19:11, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Re:September 2012

Hi, you've reverted my edit. I would like to move this image to Commons (simple text logo). Could you undo revert? Thanks, Przemub (talk) 20:25, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Unfortunately, fair use, such as logos are not allowed on commons. See wikimedia.org/wiki/Fair_use Cheers. Jim1138 (talk) 20:32, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Edits to Sri Singha article

Please see my previous edit summary before ClueBot NG. The material is either uncited, unverifiable or from websites such as "Dharma Fellowship." Please work with me on improving this article. PizzaOven (talk) 22:45, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Chloe's Closet Season 2 Is Real

Chloe's Closet Season 2 Is Real. Carys Mozart Is Real. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.246.204 (talk) 00:15, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Edit Warring at Jimbo's page

Please be aware that edit warring, even one edit, can be a violation of Wikipedia policies. There's no obvious need for the comment to be removed, so unless you can provide an overriding justification for the removal, please leave it be. Thanks. -- Avanu (talk) 01:27, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Just curious, is there a policy link for this? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 01:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

For edit warring? Sure... Wikipedia:Edit warring -- Avanu (talk) 01:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

For policy regarding a one revert limit to Jimmy Wales' page. Not complaining, just curious. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 01:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

And Jim showed no intent of continuing this beyond that.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) One revert isn't a hard rule. But when several editors are ganging up on one editor as was happening here, you should look to the policy at Wikipedia:Edit warring#The three-revert rule. "any user may report edit-warring with or without 3RR being breached. The rule is not an entitlement to revert a page a specific number of times." Apparently the editor that was adding the material is now blocked for being a sockpuppet. Removing due to the sockpuppet violation would have been a legitimate reason to remove the material. The reasons that were given by the group of you:

• rv not notable
• Reverted edits by Kijoorete-Bahnhof (talk) to last revision by Jim1138
• Yes, canvassing
• user indef blocked for disruption and then discovered to be a sockpuppet

Only the last one was a legit reason. The third one would normally be a legit reason, except it was Jimbo's page, which has a specific exception for that. -- Avanu (talk) 01:47, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Nice catch

Thanks I always leave comments on my talk--even stupid ones--but I appreciate the intervention. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 02:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Ayn Rand

Please allow me time to make edits. I was in process of adding source when you deleted my edits. Any deleted edits regarding the state require no citations because they involve core principles of her philosophy. If you want me to just cite 'Objectivism' wiki article as source I'll do that but it's totally superfluous. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.83.5.102 (talk) 03:17, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

the pic for city Benxi is not proper.

Hi Jim,

The pic for the city of Benxi is not proper at all. Plz think of getting another one.

I do not know how to do it. Hopefully you get a beautiful pic represent the city NOW.

Thanks.

Real — Preceding unsigned comment added by 107.10.40.118 (talk) 04:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Continued talk on user's talk page Jim1138 (talk) 04:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

thanks captain buzzkill

keep sucking the fun out of life 24.136.136.42 (talk) 05:31, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Tom starling

Hi Jim, you tagged Tom starling with G4, however the article hadn't previous been deleted through a deletion discussion (which is the requirement for G4), so I've changed the tag to an A7. Regards, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:33, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 08:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

No prob, hopefully the user will get the point now. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:37, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

You don't seem to be popular with the vandals at the moment (all of that ^). Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 08:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Deleted Comments in talk:Genetically modified organism.

I do not know what you are talking about, because it wuz my comments you deleted. 142.59.53.48 (talk) 22:14, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

WP:MMA

Hello,

i noticed you edited a Mixed Martial Arts page in August, but you haven't listed yourself as a Participant on the Wikiproject for Mixed Martial Arts pages. I've decided to try to drum up interest to get more people involved!

Kevlar (talk) 00:52, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Beer...

...is always appreciated. Cheers! Yunshui 雲‍水 09:44, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Ad hominem

You should know better than to edit-war. Take it to the talk page or RFPP/AIV already. —Kerfuffler 04:10, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

How pathetic is it that you at Wikipedia criticize me while you've made several hundred thousand mistakes...and, now that I've called you on a few of them, you don't want to admit you've made mistakes and correct them....pathetic, Wikipedia minion, pathetic :( ssmdh — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.105.145.42 (talk • contribs)

User:LachlanDMcCahon

Why am I editing it? Simple, its my user page. LachlanDMcCahon 04:46, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Edits were not vandalisms. Please check

The edits to Vijayendra Ghatge page or on the talk page of Phoenix PNX were not vandalism. Please help understand why you think so. 71.198.73.2 (talk) 07:40, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks Jim! Can someone also please remove that comment on top of my talk page which talks about Comcast etc? Thanks again. 71.198.73.2 (talk) 07:55, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Thinking out loud

Wondering if maybe these types of templates need to start requiring some citations. It would help in knowing if the changed information is correct. I looked at IMDb to see if any of them were correct and by chance, a couple did; however, most did not and it isn't really the best source (I'm not sure what fields are able to be changed by the public). Anyhow, nice work. Hopefully I get to see your name at the gauntlet one of these days. Calmer Waters 06:06, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Persistent vandalism

The following article has been persistently vandalized by removal of content to ensure non biased views. The vandalism is caused by user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Sufiapa

Article: http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sadia_Dehlvi&action=history — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aliabbas aa (talk • contribs) 09:56, 13 September 2012 (UTC)