User talk:M.Renae: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 15:55, 21 November 2013

Welcome!

Hello, M.Renae, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Carol Kicinski, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Tea House, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Andy Dingley (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carol Kicinski

The article Carol Kicinski has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP - Notability and lack of sources that are independent of the subject.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Dingley (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simply Gluten Free Magazine (October 2)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Simply Gluten Free Magazine.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! —Anne Delong (talk) 19:27, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! M.Renae, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Nomination of Carol Kicinski for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carol Kicinski is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carol Kicinski until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Dingley (talk) 11:08, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Concerns regarding your edits

Hello M.Renae, I have some concerns regarding your edits to Carol Kicinski. While your edits may have been made in good faith, they appear to be overly promotional in tone and and have raised concerns that you may be a paid contributor or have a conflict of interest in regards to the subject. Please read up on the various policies regarding this issue, including those on proper sourcing, conflict of interest and paid editing before continuing. --Jeremy (blah blah • I did it!) 20:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simply Gluten Free Omnimedia, Inc. (November 4)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Simply Gluten Free Omnimedia, Inc..
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 07:12, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simply Gluten Free Magazine (November 12)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Simply Gluten Free Magazine.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 18:49, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DRV question

I believe that the article's history has been restored so that people reviewing the deletion can access what was there. I believe standard practice would be to wait until that discussion concludes before making changes to the article. You could probably work up a version in your sandbox if you don't want to wait. Your version could later be pasted over the article (if it is in fact restored and possibly relisted at Articles for Deletion). I hope this makes sense. Have a happy every day. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:27, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your help, and yes it makes sense. I think I will wait to see what happens with the discussion before creating a new version, I'd rather just edit what I already have just to make it easier for me. Should I just keep checking the discussion page every now and then to see the progress? I'm assuming someone will let me know when and if it's restored so I can edit it right away, I would hate for it to be restored and I don't know about it in time to make corrections. Thanks again, --M.Renae (talk) 17:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think those discussions usually run 7-10 days. It seems quite likely it will be restored. Then it may or may not be taken to another deletion discussion. You can check your "watchlist" (button at the top of your page) to keep an eye on article you have "watched" by clicking the star at the top of them. I will try to keep an eye out and let you know here if and when I see anything. Take care. Candleabracadabra (talk) 20:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for all your help. I'll keep checking back periodically to see how the discussion goes and see if there are any changes with the status of the article. --M.Renae (talk) 15:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 20:57, 20 November 2013 edit Candleabracadabra (talk \| contribs) 25,793 edits →DRV question ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:55, 21 November 2013 edit undo M.Renae (talk \| contribs) 117 edits →DRV question Next edit →
Line 69:		Line 69:

	:I think those discussions usually run 7-10 days. It seems quite likely it will be restored. Then it may or may not be taken to another deletion discussion. You can check your "watchlist" (button at the top of your page) to keep an eye on article you have "watched" by clicking the star at the top of them. I will try to keep an eye out and let you know here if and when I see anything. Take care. [[User:Candleabracadabra\|Candleabracadabra]] ([[User talk:Candleabracadabra\|talk]]) 20:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)		:I think those discussions usually run 7-10 days. It seems quite likely it will be restored. Then it may or may not be taken to another deletion discussion. You can check your "watchlist" (button at the top of your page) to keep an eye on article you have "watched" by clicking the star at the top of them. I will try to keep an eye out and let you know here if and when I see anything. Take care. [[User:Candleabracadabra\|Candleabracadabra]] ([[User talk:Candleabracadabra\|talk]]) 20:57, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

			Thank you for all your help. I'll keep checking back periodically to see how the discussion goes and see if there are any changes with the status of the article. --[[User:M.Renae\|M.Renae]] ([[User talk:M.Renae#top\|talk]]) 15:55, 21 November 2013 (UTC)