Jump to content

Talk:Dacia Duster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Laheugan (talk | contribs)
Laheugan (talk | contribs)
Line 22: Line 22:
== Use of "wagon" in explaining vehicle class ==
== Use of "wagon" in explaining vehicle class ==


I do not think that [[wagon]] is the correct term to use in this case, and one such as "Crossover" ([[Crossover (automobile)]]) or "'''Small''' Sports Utility" ([[SUV]]) vehicle or similar would be a better fit. In addition, the "Wagon" page links to a page about historical Wagons, not the colloquialism that I believe is in modern use. Myself, being from the UK, see "Wagon" as an American term for an Estate car. [[User:Laheugan|Laheugan]] ([[User talk:Laheugan|talk]]) 18:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
I do not think that [[wagon]] is the correct term to use in this case, and one such as "Crossover" ([[Crossover (automobile)]]) or ''Small'' Sports Utility" ([[SUV]]) vehicle or similar would be a better fit. In addition, the "Wagon" page links to a page about historical Wagons, not the colloquialism that I believe is in modern use. The Duster can be viewed as competing with other brand vehicles in the Crossover class. Digressing slightly [[Three-box_styling]] contradicts that slightly, but is talking about a specific and different type of vehicle
In conclusion, I suggest "Wagon" be updated to "Crossover"
[[User:Laheugan|Laheugan]] ([[User talk:Laheugan|talk]]) 18:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:31, 5 December 2013

Move

To have a more intuitive name, this page should either be moved to Dacia Duster (2009 concept car) or Dacia Duster (2009 car), or moved to Dacia Duster over the redirect (and then leave a dablink at ARO 10, the page where Dacia Duster currently redirects). Any preference? rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 13:56, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Flat-4

Fair use image

Since the vehicle as been shown in Geneva 2009, I think claiming fair use for lack of replaceability is a bit of a stretch... Hektor (talk) 05:32, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not in Israel

The Duster isn't sold (and was never sold) in Israel, contrary to what the article stated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rtwingo (talkcontribs) 20:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Use of "wagon" in explaining vehicle class

I do not think that wagon is the correct term to use in this case, and one such as "Crossover" (Crossover (automobile)) or Small Sports Utility" (SUV) vehicle or similar would be a better fit. In addition, the "Wagon" page links to a page about historical Wagons, not the colloquialism that I believe is in modern use. The Duster can be viewed as competing with other brand vehicles in the Crossover class. Digressing slightly Three-box_styling contradicts that slightly, but is talking about a specific and different type of vehicle In conclusion, I suggest "Wagon" be updated to "Crossover" Laheugan (talk) 18:24, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]