Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Technology: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 2 discussion(s) to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Technology/Archive 1) (bot |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
=="{{noredirect|handling-machine}}"== |
=="{{noredirect|handling-machine}}"== |
||
The usage of {{la|handling-machine}} and [[handling machine]] is under discussion, see [[talk:handling-machine]]. "handling-machine" is currently a science fiction topic. -- [[Special:Contributions/65.94.78.70|65.94.78.70]] ([[User talk:65.94.78.70|talk]]) 07:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
The usage of {{la|handling-machine}} and [[handling machine]] is under discussion, see [[talk:handling-machine]]. "handling-machine" is currently a science fiction topic. -- [[Special:Contributions/65.94.78.70|65.94.78.70]] ([[User talk:65.94.78.70|talk]]) 07:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC) |
||
=="{{noredirect|Aeronautics}}"== |
|||
FYI, {{la|aeronautics}} has been proposed to be merged into [[aviation]], see [[talk:aviation]] -- [[Special:Contributions/65.94.78.9|65.94.78.9]] ([[User talk:65.94.78.9|talk]]) 23:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:26, 23 December 2013
Template:Outline of knowledge coverage
| This is the talk page for discussing WikiProject Technology and anything related to its purposes and tasks. |
|
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 8 sections are present. |
Might like to participate here Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals/Nokia
Article in progress
Hey, all. I'm puttering in userspace on an article about Star Trek's influence on science and technology. Trying to shy away a focus on how they're depicted in the fiction, I'm instead interested in good information about professionals and products that were directly inspired by the franchise. If you can suggest any leads, existing articles with good citations I can harvest, or feedback on the focus/scope/structure, etc. about the work-in-progress itself, I welcome it. I'll keep this talk page bookmarked for awhile, but feedback directly on the draft's talk page would be most useful for me. Thank you! --EEMIV (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
What do people think of this article? It seems to have started as a split from Communications but it's confusing and in part based on a self-published book.[1] It seems to have no focus and I think it's a candidate for a redirect or AfD. Dougweller (talk) 14:41, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
Sony Xperia L
Hi. I'm not at all knowlegeable in this area. But I've run across an article about a device that I'm willing to be could pass the threshhold for notability, if only someone would give it sources beyond the two commercial sites in its reference section. Would someone please review this talk page entry and the article itself. Thanks. David in DC (talk) 12:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)
Waveguide filter again
The previous FA nomination of Waveguide filter was archived without promotion due to a lack of supporters on the nomination page. Would editors interested please take a look and if you think the article is FA material please support at Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Waveguide filter/archive2. SpinningSpark 17:43, 8 November 2013 (UTC)
Dear tech people: Here's an submission at Afc about a type of battery. Is this a different topic from Aluminium–air battery? —Anne Delong (talk) 16:31, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- Don't think so. The first reference in your submitted article treats them as being two different things. In Al-ion the Al reacts with the electrolyte, in Al-air it reacts with oxygen in the air. SpinningSpark 17:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
- The Aliminum-air article says that it is not rechargeable. The Aluminum-ion references seem to indicate that this type is rechargeable. This would be a major difference - but maybe the existing article is just out of date. —Anne Delong (talk) 21:21, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
Portal:Technology for featured candidacy
I've nominated Portal:Technology for featured candidacy. Comments would be appreciated, at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Technology. — Cirt (talk) 01:58, 20 November 2013 (UTC)
The usage of Handling-machine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) and handling machine is under discussion, see talk:handling-machine. "handling-machine" is currently a science fiction topic. -- 65.94.78.70 (talk) 07:30, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
FYI, Aeronautics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) has been proposed to be merged into aviation, see talk:aviation -- 65.94.78.9 (talk) 23:26, 23 December 2013 (UTC)