User talk:Jim1138: Difference between revisions
Feb22babby (talk | contribs) →jelous: new section |
|||
Line 364: | Line 364: | ||
[[User:Duxwing|Duxwing]] ([[User talk:Duxwing|talk]]) 01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC) |
[[User:Duxwing|Duxwing]] ([[User talk:Duxwing|talk]]) 01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC) |
||
== jelous == |
|||
I will not have my page deleted ;) |
Revision as of 06:58, 24 February 2014
To Leave a New Message Please click here to start a new Section. Remember to sign your post with four tildes (~~~~). Thank you! |
Welcome!
Hello, Jim1138, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
You wrote me to stop disruptive editing. I am the one who put up the wiki page to my images of signatures. My competitors kept changing all of the links to their webpages for advertizing. I changed it back. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miraluck (talk • contribs)
JRTN
I removed what you said I removed because there are no sources to back that piece of information and is rather biased.
Clearly out of date and biased since there has not been any instance of Al-Douri advocating for separation of Iraq into Sunni and Shia only states.
TYpoon
da patti nayite mone hello sorry for disturbance
Need your guidance
Hello Jim. I noticed that you recently reverted edits on article Sajin Vass Gunawardena. Well I did the same yesterday and have been getting bombarded ever since. Let me clarify before I proceed; I am NOT requesting you to interfere in WP:ANI discussing and talk on my behalf; all I am trying to do is get an independent opinion on the matter.
I reported matter on ANI as I found certain action objectionable and questionable. Well, as expected, I did not get a satisfactory answer and have hence raised further points. In the meanwhile, it will be helpful for me if you can guide me on
- a) If the article was updated as per WP:NPOV guidelines? I checked and found no issues.
- b) If the contents (except the mention of Sajin begs forgiveness) were properly sourced and could have been maintained in the page?
- c) If the admin was right in revoking my rights when I had not even violated WP:3RR rule?
- d) If reasons given for content blanking by Admin were correct and justified?
Please try and help me out. Cheers AKS
Re your work on the 'effective stress' section
Dear Jim,
Regarding the 'effective stress' section, much of the information are wrong.
1. The reference given was wrong (i checked it in the library, Terzaghi's works were on different pages, and even in those pages, he did not explicitly define effective stress. Please refer to Terzaghi's works in either 1923 or 1936.
2. The analogy of adding and removing water to the spheres contains several mistakes. e.g. if you keep adding more water, hydrostatic pressure at the bottom of the pile would keep increasing (see triangular distribution of hydrostatic water profile). Effective stress stays constant because total stress increases by the same amount. Also, if you remove water, effective stress may not change at all if the spheres collection are allowed to change its volume.
3. Effective stress is the stress that controls the shear strength and stress-strain behaviours of geomaterials (refer to basic soil mechanics textbook). The concept of effective stress itself can be made much more fundamental (refer to the works of Biot or Coussy)
Please redo the entire section.
Best regards, Liam.
Meranau
Meranau recalls the tradition of the fabled kingdom of Bembaran as the origin of the people and of the towns therein. Tradition claim that the Meranau descended from Bantugen of the fabled kingdom of Bembaran, some believed is the present day Lake Lanao, while a few scholars point of Cabadbaran of Agusan based on geographical explanations provided in the Darangen, Meranau epic.The myth around the destruction of Bembaran remain sorouded, yet many believed a great volcanic eruption of Mount Makaturing completely erased the kingdom from the face of the earth and in place of Kiaranda a ragat,Tiongcop a Layagen- the present Lake Lanao.
Tradition claims that at the time of the destruction, a brother of four were out on a hunting safari. The brothers reached kamanga, a village at the edge of a forest in what is now Dakudau Mapantao Bubong. Learning the event that befall the fabled Kingdom of Bembaran, the brothers agreed to build their own kingdoms on what is now the two Lanao provinces. Butuanen Kalinan, the eldest of the four chose the largest area stretching from the municipality of Marantao on the northwest side of the Lake to the northern part going to the east of the rimming mountain and towards the southeast. This was the principality of Bayabao. The inggued or towns comprising Bayabao are the present day non-municpality and municipalities of Marantao, Saguiaran, Baudi-Puso Bentong, Piagapo, Maguing, Bembaran, Wao, Lembabayabao, Poonabayabao, Ditsaan-Ramain, Bubong and Marawi City. The second brother, Dimaampao Kalinan, to take Principality of Onayan, now comprised by the municipalities of Butig, Lumbayanague, Macadar,Lembac a unayan,Dumalundong,Lumbatan, Bayang, Tubaran, Binidayan, Marogong, Ganassi, Paulas, Madamba, Kalanogas, Sultan Gumander,Maganding, Malabang, Balabagan, Kapatagan and Karomatan.
The third brother, Batara Kilaten, chose the area around the southwest-southeaster side to the northwest side across the lake. This is the Principality of Masiu (formerly Zainun) composed of present-day municipalities of Taraka, Molundo, Tamparan, Masiu, Madalum, Munai, Kalawi-Bacolod, Tugaya and Balindong.
Amerogong Topa-an, the fourth brother took the northwest side across the Agus river down to Iligan bay and called the Principality of Balo-I, now composed of the municipalities of Pantar,Tagoloan, Balo-I, Matenggao, Pantao-Ragat, Poona Piagapo, Tangcal, Magsaysay, Lapayan, Kauswagan,Linamon, Bacolod, Maigo, Kolambugan and Iligan City. The traditional principality is now located mostly in Lanao del Norte.
The four principalities is to the Meranaus the Pat A Phangampong Ko Ranao (Literary means four Kingdom of Pangampong a Ranau), built on the Igma Ago Taritib (Order and Consensus) among the founding fathers, this is the unwritten constitution that binds the Meranau since then up to the present. To safeguard the agreement, the forefathers instituted the Maratabat or Meranau psychology that is deeply ingrained in the cultural matrix. The origin maybe mythical but the operation of the Phangampong and adherence to the consensus remain alive and sustained. The coming of Islam to Lanao is contingent to the coming of Islam to Sulu and Maguindanao during the 14th century. Sharif Kabungsuan who descended from a line of missionaries tracing lineage to Prophet Muhammad, first reached Maguindanao and proceeded to Lanao. The Salsila or genealogy is zealousy guarded recording line of descent from Prophet Muhammad. The other Arab missionary, Sharif Alawi also came to Ranau by way of Taguloan, now the municipality of Taguloan in the province of Misamis Oriental.
Thus, the coming of Islam to Ranau further sustained the already existing principalities thereby further claiming affinity to the Muslim world. The ethno-linguistic matrix of the Meranau finds strong affinity to that of the Maguindanao of the Cotabato provinces and the Ilanun, who settled partly in Maguindanao and in Lanao. The Meranau claim that Irannun group, from the Meranau word Iranaun or from the Lake region, were actually Meranau who ventured to trade in the flourishing Sulu-China trade route cutting across Malaysia and Indonesia. Recorded History cites that the Sulu sultanate employed Illannun mariners in their trade. Many of the Illanuns who reached Sabah and other areas in Borneo settled in these places. Hence, to this day there are groups there who are still referred to as Illanun and traces descent to the Ilannun in both Maguindanao and Ranau of Meranau called in latin word Maranao people.
Red Granite Pictures
Actually,I thought it's ok to put it in Red Granite Pictures page. Does it violate any wikipedia policy if I put it in Red Granite Picture wiki page instead of Riza Aziz page? If not then I will just edit it there in Red Granite Picture wiki page. The one is Riza Aziz wiki page,I'm still having discussion with other users.I've decided to remove the on in Riza Aziz wiki page and choose to put it in Red Granite Pictures wiki page. If everything ok and I did not violate wikipedia policy then I will leave it it Red Granite Pictures wiki page.If I do please be specific on which policy I violate. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PVCfiredauz (talk • contribs)
You reverted my USER page!
Oh for heaven's sake. It's a USER page! It's not an encyclopedia page! I was promoting no business nor any commercial activity; I was helping others who wanted to know more about me, the USER!
I see nothing in the guideline page you sent me that indicates they should apply to user pages. Are you saying I should waste bandwidth and make maintenance harder by wholesale copying from other places, rather than linking to them? That's okay if your thing is hummingbirds, I guess...
Now if someone saw fit to create a page about me in the main namespace, I could see your concern.
I did a search for "user page guidelines," and saw nothing.
Do you really think the guidelines for main namespace pages should apply to individuals' personal User: pages? If so, I'm simply going to delete mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jan Steinman (talk • contribs) to jim 1138: NO
Archdiocesan Classical Gymnasium (Zagreb)
Hi Jim.... I was just correcting a semantic mistake...because when saying gymnasium it does not describe a grammar school but a gym, and as I can see this text was in reference to a grammar school. But I didn't know I had to enlist a reference link for that. I am sorry about that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.252.213.64 (talk) 20:23, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- The article is in fact about a school; but the correct description for it is still "Gymnasium". I think your confusion is coming from that word having different meanings in some cultures. See Gymnasium (school) for clarification of the term in the context of the article you were editing. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 20:33, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Renaming a school should be sourced. If it is misnamed, it would be a good idea to get the correct English name and rename the article as well as the contents. It does appear to be a translation error. I see that "Nadbiskupska klasična gimnazija s pravom javnosti" machine translates to "Primate classical high school accredited" (google). The Croatian Wikipedia article is hr:Nadbiskupska klasična gimnazija, "Nadbiskupska klasična gimnazija" machine translates to "Primate classical gymnasium". Suggesting someone perhaps machine translated the article. I would say the article should be renamed. Is there an "official" English name of the school and if so, can you shoot me a link? I can rename the article, but I don't want to mis-rename it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
- Jim, I've partially reverted your edit. Please see Gymnasium (school) - while the term "gymnasium" means one thing in the USA and some other countries, in other countries the term "usually refers to secondary schools focused on preparing students to enter a university for advanced academic study". It's not a question of mis-translation - the term is legitimately part of the name of the institution. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Hello - I received your emails today. The comments from the school support a name change, as they are calling it a High School themselves; but I would prefer having a link to their website supporting that name to support verifiability rather than just an email as it has limits for others being able to review to verify should it be questioned later. Any suggestions for a link? --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:29, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
- Jim, I've partially reverted your edit. Please see Gymnasium (school) - while the term "gymnasium" means one thing in the USA and some other countries, in other countries the term "usually refers to secondary schools focused on preparing students to enter a university for advanced academic study". It's not a question of mis-translation - the term is legitimately part of the name of the institution. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 03:47, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
- Renaming a school should be sourced. If it is misnamed, it would be a good idea to get the correct English name and rename the article as well as the contents. It does appear to be a translation error. I see that "Nadbiskupska klasična gimnazija s pravom javnosti" machine translates to "Primate classical high school accredited" (google). The Croatian Wikipedia article is hr:Nadbiskupska klasična gimnazija, "Nadbiskupska klasična gimnazija" machine translates to "Primate classical gymnasium". Suggesting someone perhaps machine translated the article. I would say the article should be renamed. Is there an "official" English name of the school and if so, can you shoot me a link? I can rename the article, but I don't want to mis-rename it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Edit to Excited Delirium
I edited the article without changing its meaning and therefore required no source. :)
-Duxwing — Preceding unsigned comment added by Duxwing (talk • contribs) 02:03, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Archipelago
Hey, I'm going to remove your contentious edit to the page Archipelago again, as there is no scientific modern geography reference for your claim that the "British Isles" is an archipelago. If you find one, great, until then it's out. 86.45.205.129 (talk) 08:46, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
regarding removal of links
Quote == January 2014 == Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Are You Listening! has been reverted.
Your edit here to Are You Listening! was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.facebook.com/film.areyoulistening) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 07:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC) Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Are You Listening!, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:27, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Dear Jim,
Thanks for your response. About the external links, I posted them since it could be further reading material that would help readers perceive more about the article and could motivate them to edit the article and add more information. I was unsure whether the links are valid for posting as per the rules of including external links within articles. Hence I did not add all of them back except the ones which I was sure about. Would the rest be fine to add to the article? Thanks.
I am new to wikipedia and there is yet to learn a lot about editing wiki. apologies for failing to mention the edit summary in some of the edits. It went completely off my mind.
regards,
Camerazaman (talk) 05:17, 12 February 2014 (UTC)
sources
My sources are my eyes and ears. I would not add something or edit something if it wasn't true. But I will add a source. It will come from a thomas supporter. I don't know how that makes the edit any more valid than my input alone. Everyone knows liberals trash black conservatives. This is no secret. Its important that the population that doesn't follow politics learns this and understands it. I don't do political correctness. I explain things the way they are. We meed more people like this — Preceding unsigned comment added by Taxi502 (talk • contribs) 04:14, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Discussions
I'm discussing only aspects that should be specified in the article, although I haven't said that explicitly.--5.15.183.49 (talk) 17:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Brian Lichtenberg
Hello Jim,
Please stop undoing my edit on Brian Lichtenberg's wiki page who was made by someone with no accurate knowledge of Brian Lichtenberg and who sourced a Vanity Fair article in which Brian's words were indeed manipulated. I have the original source interview that Vanity Fair used for the article and "QUOTED" Brian inaccurately and fraudulently. The interview is confidential. Thank you. Tappindustries (talk) 08:34, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Brian Litchenberg
Hello Jim, Do you really want a lawsuit on your hands for administering false representation of a biography of a living persons. Please remove this article. Please explain to me why you continue to keep this article up? Vanity Fair interview was false and manipulated. I don't see a single quote from Brian. We only want that section removed. Everything else can stay. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DerreckTapp (talk • contribs) 09:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
HELLO
The Mao Xinyu content is sourced.It is sourced by a magazine named 炎黄春秋。Do you want me to show photo of it to you??Victorkkd (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
HELLO
The Mao Xinyu content is sourced.It is sourced by a magazine named 炎黄春秋。Do you want me to show photo of it to you??Victorkkd (talk) 08:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
I gave source, I gave the issue"2013 SEP."I gave the title and translated it.I gave author in pinyin.That's fairly good enought citing.That's it.And you can just check zh.wiki to see if the Mao's birth is there.Victorkkd (talk) 09:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
So I can add Mao Xinyu now right?And what about the human shield contents?In that entry there are all sources right?And why you say unsourced?Just would you tell me is there any reason to remove content of Mao Xinyu,as well as Human shield now?I gave all sources, did I not.Victorkkd (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Would you please add references in a way where English speakers can find them? Maybe an English translation of the periodical name? Perhaps use template:cite journal or template:cite news? Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 09:36, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- I searched ,all I can find is journal Yanhuang Chunqiu (炎黄春秋) (Chronicles of History).But I highly doubt whether Chronicles of History is official English name for I couldn't find an official one on its official site. Should that naming suffice?And I don't understand why no one required 毛新宇与郝明莉离婚 毛新宇的第一次婚姻(组图)-毛新宇与郝明莉离婚,-城市周刊-citing to be translated? And again,what content in the human shield entry is unsourced?Please tell me.Victorkkd (talk) 09:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps frustration? The intent is that users be able to find a source for information on Wikipedia. I.e. verifiabilitySo, if you can arrange thing so that Joe average user can figure out where the information came from, that would be in the spirit of verifiability. Much appreciated. Jim1138 (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- So I will add the official site,I will add ISBN.Should that be good enough?In this case if someone saying"blog source"and remove it,he isn't being reasonable right?And again,what content of human shield is unsourced.Victorkkd (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- I think that would be a big help and would alleviate my objections! Thank you for doing this. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:56, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- So I will add the official site,I will add ISBN.Should that be good enough?In this case if someone saying"blog source"and remove it,he isn't being reasonable right?And again,what content of human shield is unsourced.Victorkkd (talk) 09:28, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps frustration? The intent is that users be able to find a source for information on Wikipedia. I.e. verifiabilitySo, if you can arrange thing so that Joe average user can figure out where the information came from, that would be in the spirit of verifiability. Much appreciated. Jim1138 (talk) 09:48, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
- I searched ,all I can find is journal Yanhuang Chunqiu (炎黄春秋) (Chronicles of History).But I highly doubt whether Chronicles of History is official English name for I couldn't find an official one on its official site. Should that naming suffice?And I don't understand why no one required 毛新宇与郝明莉离婚 毛新宇的第一次婚姻(组图)-毛新宇与郝明莉离婚,-城市周刊-citing to be translated? And again,what content in the human shield entry is unsourced?Please tell me.Victorkkd (talk) 09:42, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
cashville
id eleted cashville because that is not cashville records — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:B:9780:528:155C:219D:36CF:B29F (talk) 09:14, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
cashvillle
i didn't know cashville was sanford — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:B:9780:528:155C:219D:36CF:B29F (talk) 09:19, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
The article scope is on topic
welcome to wikipedia to you to! :-)
I see you've deleted my talk page contribution.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Talk_page#Behavior_that_is_unacceptable
I'm sorry but there is nothing wrong with my post.
The scope of the article is multiple resarchers and multiple experiments.
The article is about the whole field of LENR, CMNS and cold fusion experiments.
It is not about a singular experiment. 84.106.26.81 (talk) 03:11, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
All Saints Anglican School
Hi,
I'm the person who edited Cody Simpson into the article 'All Saints Anglican School'. I'm going to ask have you ever been to this school or not? I knew Cody well and he use to go to All Saints Anglican School with me. If you want a source, here is a simple one. This link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xyMlA1kN7lw is the year 7 awards night finale. I was watching at the front row. Here is also another link which shows that Cody Simpson use to go to All Saints Anglican School: http://codysimpson.weebly.com/about-cody.html I still live in the Gold Coast, most people miss him including his friends. I hope these links will prove to you that Cody goes to ASAS.
Thanks, ASAS past student.
PS: Don't forget to put back my edit about Cody Simpson going to ASAS under 'Famous People'.
Carpet Reversion of My Recent Edits
Jim, why did you do that?
If to age is to callous over one's sympathy, then I shall remain a I child forever. (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
- Copied to and replied on Duxwing's talk page. Jim1138 (talk) 17:19, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
>_< I apologize for my belated rejoinder; I appreciate your reply. I have been trying to understand how to stylistically rewrite without damaging articles. I know not entirely how my style conflicts with Wikipedia's and therefore fear that Velella will as he threatened so report me to the moderators when my next edit is reverted.
If to age is to callous over one's sympathy, then I shall remain a I child forever. (talk) 20:16, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Jim! :)
If to age is to callous over one's sympathy, then I shall remain a I child forever. (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi, can you help me with a small project?
I would like to offload most of the sexism article into smaller sub-articles. I have noticed evidence of edit warring and significant clutter on this page. Reduction of clutter on a major page, and offloading the edit warring from the main page to the supplemental pages seems beneficial. 50.83.153.97 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 21:45, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
Edits on Keep Your Health Plan Act of 2013
Hi, your recent reversion on Keep Your Health Plan Act of 2013 caught my notice. You said that "defect" counted as a weasel word, but that's the exact word that was used in the source to describe what happened. More generally, I don't see how "defect" could count as a weasel word anyway - it means to leave the side you were on and join the opposing side. That would accurately describe the Democrats who voted in favor of this bill (and therefore against what the leaders of their party wanted). Anyway, at the very least, it would still make sense to leave the vote count in, instead of deleting it all just because you didn't like the word "defect". I'm going to replace that now. Thanks! HistoricMN44 (talk) 22:08, 18 February 2014 (UTC)
I HAZ CONSTRUCTIVE EDITS
HEY MAN MY EDITS ARE CONSTRUCTIVE 69.59.82.42 (talk) 01:21, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
- ...really? Your recent contributions constitute vandalism. K6ka (talk | contribs) 01:22, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Class report
Hello Jim,
My husband and I are very disappointed in our son, T.J. Juckson, for making erroneous edits to Wikipedia pages. We've reminded him that it was Morgan Freeman, NOT Laurence Fishburne, who starred in Coach Carter. Thank you for catching his vandalicious acts.
We again apologize for T.J.'s hurtful, pornographic actions. He's threatened to warp our Kenny G albums, which we desperately need for our "whoopee making" sessions.
After we caught him making pro-revival-of-DOMA petitions, we've put him on a cocktail of herbal medicines and have instituted a fructose-free diet. No bananas for T.J. ;)
We wish you the best of luck in your hummingbird feeder endeavors.
Yours in Christ,
The Jucksons — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.61.228.201 (talk) 04:24, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim
Any help you could offer as to getting Black Shuck (FILM) on Wikipedia or if you could try and help me get a experienced editor to list the film as i really have no idea how to update Wikipedia. ( film )to found footage movies link attached http://www.lovefilm.com/film/Black-Shuck/173530/
Title Black Shuck UK Horror film.
thanks Paul.
Paul Easter (talk) 14:14, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
AMSN
Hello Jim,
I work at the AMSN National Office and the board of directors asked that I update all pages related to Medical-Surgical Nursing. The information that I changed was to reflect current information available on our website.
The changes were not a mistake as any additions I had would have been redundant. I apologize that you feel your information was compromised in anyway.
To confirm that these changes were legitimate you can call the AMSN National Office at 1-866-877-2676 and ask for Trish.
66.208.236.221 (talk) 17:44, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Trish
STOP!
STOP! This is the only warning you will receive for beating me to reverts. The next time you beat me to reverting vandalism, you will be awarded a barnstar and praised repeatedly without further notice. (t) Josve05a (c) 18:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Stallions
Please do not remove my citation, it is the only one on this topic. if you wanna, you reply in the discussion. By the way stallions can be kept together--Agnello inferocito (talk) 19:15, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
External Link
Hi Jim, thanks for the note. I don't know why you feel that link was inappropriate. I've used those calculators for my actual work, and I'm sure other readers will find them useful as well. I can see no difference between powerandsamplesize.com as an external link compared with the others that are already there. TedPSS (talk) 04:11, 20 February 2014 (UTC)TedPSS
Indiggo
Hi, It's Indiggo, Mihaela and Gabriela Modorcea. Our user name is Indiggo77. Thank you for all your messages and tips. There is a user name with the number 63.247.160.139 who edits our wikipedia unceasingly and provides false information on us deleting all our citations from reputable sites and sources like billboard, broadway world etc. He keeps deleting all the citations and links that we and other users have provided. We are American citizens, featured in thousands of magazines, newspapers, TV shows..., professional actresses - graduates with honor from the National University of Theatrical Arts and Cinematography of Bucharest, SAG eligible; we are professional singers - signed under Sony BMG. The user 63.247.160.139 keeps saying "that we are aspiring actresses and singers". He is violating our page and our hard work and uses abusive, untruthful and harmful language! He also deleted our photo provided on Wikipedia with our cover of LA LA LA featured and credited on the Watch The Throne album of Jay-Z & Kanye West and released under DAS LAbel. Please, protect our page and do not let individuals who can not give their name edit pages and harming artists who have worked so hard to fulfill their dreams and achieve notability.
Many thanks, Indiggo77 (talk) 04:39, 20 February 2014 (UTC) Mihaela&Gabriela
Thank you Jim. Please help me to fix the mistake since I'm still in the learning process.
otherwise, give reference68.100.160.250 (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
References
Hi Jim,
Can you please help me to edit the reference source for my new article? I read but not fully understand.
Thanks Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdorableTeddy (talk • contribs) 05:54, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim
Ok, I hope I did it right this time, can you please help me check my work?
Thanks Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdorableTeddy (talk • contribs) 06:36, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
thank you Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdorableTeddy (talk • contribs) 07:10, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Notary
Hi Jim,
What is the Notability ? My new page has the Notability mark on it, how can I fix it? Please help.
Thanks ADT (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
gamestation
hi I couldn't see anything inappropriate with that could you please put it back and tell me what was wrong with it. thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.16.192.182 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Hi Jim, I have no idea why I'm getting a message from you that I'm doing violation. This is our class homework and we have to edit or add information to Wiki. What should I do ? All information I;m posting belong to my previous papers or class assignments that I'm posting here.(Hedih) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hedieh Taraghi (talk • contribs) 06:48, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
please help
Hi Jim, No, actually I had a problem with the page Kelly Tran, not the other page, can you please help me to edit it? I'm not sure what went wrong, thanks a lot buddy. ADT (talk) 08:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, Jim
I intended to write a new article after deleting the content, but didn't get to it. Thanks for reverting the changes.
Shundarshuman (talk) 10:17, 21 February 2014 (UTC) Shundarshuman
Stallions
Thanks for your proposal. I appreciate it :). I will propose it in the discussion. There is another sentence in the articole that has to be modified. Everything in the discussion of the article.--Agnello inferocito (talk) 23:29, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Done!
Duxwing (talk) 01:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
jelous
I will not have my page deleted ;)