Talk:Double Jeopardy Clause: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 21:41, 24 February 2014

Law C‑class Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States Start‑class Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Double Jeopardy (film)

The section regarding this film is not well-verified. It needs improvements, or it shall be removed. --George Ho (talk) 02:16, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reworded a few things and added inline citations to external sources. Have another look at it. If you still have concerns, please be specific in listing your concerns. Arcturis (talk) 00:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hopefully, it is better. Hopefully, the section follows exactly what the sources say. And original analyses are omitted, thankfully, unless I'm proven wrong. --George Ho (talk) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This whole section should be put into the movie article with just a "See Also..." at the end. There are lots of fictional movies including the double jeopardy law. There are lots of movies with legal mistakes in them - there's a website dedicated to movie mistakes, they aren't important to the actual law. 91.125.105.194 (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Legal Sentence

"Jeopardy attaches in jury trial ", please translate from legalese into English. 91.125.105.194 (talk) 21:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 :Reworded a few things and added inline citations to external sources. Have another look at it. If you still have concerns, please be specific in listing your concerns. [[User:Arcturis|Arcturis]] ([[User talk:Arcturis|talk]]) 00:01, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
 :: Hopefully, [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Double_Jeopardy_Clause&diff=583460467&oldid=583324843 it is better]. Hopefully, the section follows exactly what the sources say. And original analyses are omitted, thankfully, unless I'm proven wrong. --[[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 01:36, 27 November 2013 (UTC)
+::This whole section should be put into the movie article with just a "See Also..." at the end. There are lots of fictional movies including the double jeopardy law. There are lots of movies with legal mistakes in them - there's a website dedicated to movie mistakes, they aren't important to the actual law. [[Special:Contributions/91.125.105.194|91.125.105.194]] ([[User talk:91.125.105.194|talk]]) 21:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
+<br />
+===Legal Sentence===
+"Jeopardy attaches in jury trial ", please translate from legalese into English. [[Special:Contributions/91.125.105.194|91.125.105.194]] ([[User talk:91.125.105.194|talk]]) 21:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)