Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counterinsurgency, Democracy and the Politics of Identity in India: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:00, 6 March 2014

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. slakr^\ talk / 02:14, 6 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Counterinsurgency, Democracy and the Politics of Identity in India

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and I have a distinct impression that there is a conflict of interest concerning the creator, given that virtually all their edits across all articles relate to this book and its author. Sitush (talk) 16:27, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:46, 9 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger _{One ping only} 10:26, 15 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 16:28, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 01:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. A 2013 book on this topic of a not-so-popular writer could hardly be notable this early. Someone from The Hindu has taken efforts of printing a quote that appears in this book. Even if the book is actually notable and if many other authors do take references from here in future, the notability of it might increase. As of now, its WP:TOOSOON to call it notable and warrent separate article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 04:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete without prejudice. The book review in The Hindu linked above is the only independent, non-trivial coverage of the book I can find. The notability guideline for books requires multiple sources of such coverage. I would support recreation if and when more coverage emerges. It's a new book, so that's plausible. Userfication may be an acceptable alternative. Lagrange 613 08:26, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Currently, this is little more than basic research. I'd delete per Lagrange. Bearian (talk) 20:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

@@ Line 20: / Line 20: @@
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''[[WP:RELIST|Relisted]] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br />
-:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 01:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->[[Category:Relisted AfD debates|{{SUBPAGENAME}}]]
+:<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, [[User:Mark Arsten|Mark Arsten]] ([[User talk:Mark Arsten|talk]]) 01:27, 22 February 2014 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->
 <hr style="width:55%;" />
 *'''Delete'''. A 2013 book on ''this'' topic of a not-so-popular writer could hardly be notable this early. Someone from ''The Hindu'' has taken efforts of [http://www.thehindu.com/opinion/op-ed/the-violence-of-compassion/article5699620.ece printing a quote] that appears in this book. Even if the book is actually notable and if many other authors do take references from here in future, the notability of it might increase. As of now, its [[WP:TOOSOON]] to call it notable and warrent separate article. §§[[User:Dharmadhyaksha|<font color = "red" >Dharmadhyaksha</font>]]§§ {[[User talk:Dharmadhyaksha|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/Dharmadhyaksha|C]]} 04:55, 24 February 2014 (UTC)