Jump to content

Talk:Adam Goodes: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
Line 9: Line 9:
the references to his performance and the wording of this article is a joke... "he turned on the style"...
the references to his performance and the wording of this article is a joke... "he turned on the style"...
this is an encyclopedia not a fan book. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.45.119.120|121.45.119.120]] ([[User talk:121.45.119.120|talk]]) 12:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
this is an encyclopedia not a fan book. <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/121.45.119.120|121.45.119.120]] ([[User talk:121.45.119.120|talk]]) 12:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->
ask hin what job you do


== Clarification ==
== Clarification ==

Revision as of 03:14, 4 August 2014

Why is there a "Tribunal history" section in the article. His record is not THAT bad, over a long career - just what is intended to be imputed?

Untitled

the references to his performance and the wording of this article is a joke... "he turned on the style"... this is an encyclopedia not a fan book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.45.119.120 (talk) 12:27, 10 May 2008 (UTC) ask hin what job you do[reply]

Clarification

This article could use a few - for instance the reference to South Melbourne is not explained. Mentions of positions that Goodes plays are not explained - why would you be retired from rucking?

Perhaps some of these terms can be linked to other articles. Anyway I'll leave it to the experts. I just don't think it would read very well to someone who has absolutely no idea about AFL.

he is also in the aborigini team of the century

Racial Abuse

Why does the article pull its punch in respect to the racial vilification he suffered from Eddie McGuire, who broadcast his disgusting comment to a radio audience of tens of thousands of listeners, and then before his so-called apology, stated "I didn't racially vilify anyone"?

It should simply state that Goodes is a champion AFL footballer and proud Indigenous Australian who was the victim of unprovoked racial vilification from the President of the Collingwood Football Club whilst broadcasting his commercial radio program.

Why don't we just insert the facts?