Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Borrowed Time (Doctor Who): Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m →Borrowed Time (Doctor Who): fix incorrect link |
|||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
*'''Merge OR Delete''' per {{u|Fiachra10003}} - To be honest I'm not sure whether merging is a good idea but if not then '''Delete'''. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]] • [[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">''(talk)''</span>]] 03:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Merge OR Delete''' per {{u|Fiachra10003}} - To be honest I'm not sure whether merging is a good idea but if not then '''Delete'''. –[[User:Davey2010|<span style="color: blue;">'''Davey'''</span><span style="color: orange;">'''2010'''</span>]] • [[User talk:Davey2010|<span style="color: navy;">''(talk)''</span>]] 03:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Merge''' with [[List_of_Doctor_Who_novelisations]]. Its a piece of Doctor Who merchandise, so there should be ample places to perform a merge. Otherwise, just delete it. [[User:Spirit of Eagle|Spirit of Eagle]] ([[User talk:Spirit of Eagle|talk]]) 04:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
*'''Merge''' with [[List_of_Doctor_Who_novelisations]]. Its a piece of Doctor Who merchandise, so there should be ample places to perform a merge. Otherwise, just delete it. [[User:Spirit of Eagle|Spirit of Eagle]] ([[User talk:Spirit of Eagle|talk]]) 04:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep''' and expand with reference to reliable source reviews: [http://www. |
*'''Keep''' and expand with reference to reliable source reviews: [http://www.cultbox.co.uk/reviews/books-a-cds/doctor-who-borrowed-time-by-naomi-a-alderman-book-review][http://www.doctorwhoreviews.co.uk/ELDA16.htm] and author interview: [http://forward.com/articles/146323/delving-into-world-of-doctor-who/?p=all] [[User:JulesH|JulesH]] ([[User talk:JulesH|talk]]) 21:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC) |
||
Revision as of 22:00, 10 August 2014
- Borrowed Time (Doctor Who) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No indication of notability, no references. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:40, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 12:03, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:59, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. No evidence of notability or even a source to prove it exists. It only escapes speedy deletion (A3) by a very narrow margin. Fleet Command (talk) 07:34, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with List_of_Doctor_Who_novelisations if appropriate. Otherwise delete. The present article doesn't even give us enough information to know if the book fits in this list. Fiachra10003 (talk) 17:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:32, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Merge OR Delete per Fiachra10003 - To be honest I'm not sure whether merging is a good idea but if not then Delete. –Davey2010 • (talk) 03:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Merge with List_of_Doctor_Who_novelisations. Its a piece of Doctor Who merchandise, so there should be ample places to perform a merge. Otherwise, just delete it. Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:33, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- Keep and expand with reference to reliable source reviews: [1][2] and author interview: [3] JulesH (talk) 21:59, 10 August 2014 (UTC)