Talk:USS Macon (ZRS-5): Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:03, 30 September 2014

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the USS Macon (ZRS-5) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Military history: Aviation / Maritime / North America / United States C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	Maritime warfare task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Aviation: Aircraft C‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation articles

C

This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Ships C‑class

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

National Register of Historic Places C‑class Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
C	This article has been rated as C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the On this day section on February 12, 2012.

Photos

Update: New photos posted at LiveScie nce, September 28th. http://www.livescience.com/history/060928_airship_wreck.html --ElfWord 22:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A currently ongoing exploration of the airship Macon can be viewed at http://montereybay.noaa.gov/research/macon/feed.html or at http://www.oceanslive.org/portal/ .

Hello! I find it strange that none of the airplanes where ordered to inspect the initial damage 4pm local time and 1200kilo times 5 for the planes is also a considerate weight which could have delayed the crash, took several hours inbetween the crash and first inital damage. Well, hindsight is 20/20. RGDS Alexmcfire

Some effort was made to jettison the planes, but they could not be freed; perhaps they were jammed by the large angle of hull inclination. I agree it's hard to believe they couldn't have been freed with axes. There were a number of missed opportunities to save the ship. For example, the two after engines (out of 8) weighed 2300 kg between them and would have supplied a strong righting moment if hacked free with axes and allowed to tear free from the ship. fnj2, 06:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

How big were they?

They were so big...but were they "largest"? Longest, greatest volume, greatest lift? Some clarification would be welcome. TREKphiler ^{hit me ♠} 19:26, 30 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Female beeing

I'm not english mother tongue. Is there an objective reason for the vehicle to be referred with the feminine pronoun, or is it a writer's personal preference to attribute sex to things? Also, I noticed this attitude with other "big and massive" military equipment too. Medende (talk) 03:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC) -It's customary to refer to ships (and airships) with the feminine pronoun. 72.224.172.14 (talk) 13:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:NH43901-enhanced.jpg to appear as POTD

Hello! This is a note to let the editors of this article know that File:NH43901-enhanced.jpg will be appearing as picture of the day on September 30, 2014. You can view and edit the POTD blurb at Template:POTD/2014-09-30. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. Thanks! — Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:00, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Picture of the day

USS Macon was a rigid airship built and operated by the United States Navy for scouting. It also served as a "flying aircraft carrier", carrying biplane parasite aircraft, either five single-seat Curtiss F9C Sparrowhawks for scouting or two-seat Fleet N2Y-1s for training. Launched in 1933, Macon was in service for less than two years: in 1935 it was damaged in a storm and lost off California's Big Sur coast. Its wreckage is listed as "USS Macon Airship Remains" on the National Register of Historic Places.Photo: Naval Historical Center

Archive – More featured pictures...

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 I'm not english mother tongue. Is there an objective reason for the vehicle to be referred with the feminine pronoun, or is it a writer's personal preference to attribute sex to things? Also, I noticed this attitude with other "big and massive" military equipment too. [[User:Medende|Medende]] ([[User talk:Medende|talk]]) 03:03, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
+-It's customary to refer to ships (and airships) with the feminine pronoun. [[Special:Contributions/72.224.172.14|72.224.172.14]] ([[User talk:72.224.172.14|talk]]) 13:03, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 == [[:File:NH43901-enhanced.jpg]] to appear as POTD ==