Wikipedia:Redirect: Difference between revisions
PseudoSudo (talk | contribs) →How to make a redirect: rm note on bots; documentation of third-party software bugs don't belong here |
→What do we use redirects for?: disable categorization of this template list as far as supported |
||
Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
== What do we use redirects for? == |
== What do we use redirects for? == |
||
:''Compare the more complete template [[Wikipedia:Template_messages/Redirect_pages|list]] and the corresponding [[:Category:Redirect templates|category]].'' |
|||
{| class="wikitable" |
{| class="wikitable" |
||
! style="width:10em" | Reason |
! style="width:10em" | Reason |
||
Line 49: | Line 51: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Abbreviations |
|Abbreviations |
||
|{{R from abbreviation}} |
|{{R from abbreviation|category=}} |
||
*[[DSM-IV]] redirects to [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] |
*[[DSM-IV]] redirects to [[Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders]] |
||
|{{tl|R from abbreviation}} |
|{{tl|R from abbreviation}} |
||
Line 56: | Line 58: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Misspellings |
|Misspellings |
||
|{{R from misspelling}} |
|{{R from misspelling|category=}} |
||
*[[Condoleeza Rice]] redirects to [[Condoleezza Rice]] |
*[[Condoleeza Rice]] redirects to [[Condoleezza Rice]] |
||
|{{tl|R from misspelling}} |
|{{tl|R from misspelling}} |
||
Line 63: | Line 65: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Other spellings, other punctuation |
|Other spellings, other punctuation |
||
|{{R from alternate spelling}} |
|{{R from alternate spelling|category=}} |
||
*[[colour]] redirects to [[color]] |
*[[colour]] redirects to [[color]] |
||
* [[Al-Jazeera]] redirects to [[Al Jazeera]] |
* [[Al-Jazeera]] redirects to [[Al Jazeera]] |
||
Line 71: | Line 73: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Other capitalisations, to ensure that "Go" to a mixed-capitalisation article title is case-insensitive |
|Other capitalisations, to ensure that "Go" to a mixed-capitalisation article title is case-insensitive |
||
|{{R from other capitalisation}} |
|{{R from other capitalisation|category=}} |
||
Adding a redirect for '''mixed-capitalisation article titles''' (e.g., Isle of Wight) allows "Go" to these articles to be case-insensitive. For example, without the redirect [[Isle of wight]] a "Go" for "Isle Of wight" or any capitalisation other than exactly 'Isle of Wight' would not find the article [[Isle of Wight]]. |
Adding a redirect for '''mixed-capitalisation article titles''' (e.g., Isle of Wight) allows "Go" to these articles to be case-insensitive. For example, without the redirect [[Isle of wight]] a "Go" for "Isle Of wight" or any capitalisation other than exactly 'Isle of Wight' would not find the article [[Isle of Wight]]. |
||
Line 88: | Line 90: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Other names, pseudonyms, nicknames, and synonyms |
|Other names, pseudonyms, nicknames, and synonyms |
||
|{{R from alternate name}} |
|{{R from alternate name|category=}} |
||
*[[Wellie throwing]] redirects to [[Wellie wanging]] |
*[[Wellie throwing]] redirects to [[Wellie wanging]] |
||
*[[Butcher of Kurdistan]] redirects to [[Ali Hassan al-Majid]] |
*[[Butcher of Kurdistan]] redirects to [[Ali Hassan al-Majid]] |
||
Line 98: | Line 100: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Scientific names |
|Scientific names |
||
|{{R from scientific name}} |
|{{R from scientific name|category=}} |
||
*''[[Heosemys depressa]]'' redirects to [[Arakan Forest Turtle]] |
*''[[Heosemys depressa]]'' redirects to [[Arakan Forest Turtle]] |
||
*[[Deuterium oxide]] redirects to [[Heavy water]] |
*[[Deuterium oxide]] redirects to [[Heavy water]] |
||
Line 107: | Line 109: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Scientific names |
|Scientific names |
||
|{{R to scientific name}} |
|{{R to scientific name|category=}} |
||
*[[European shore crab]] redirects to ''[[Carcinus maenas]]'' |
*[[European shore crab]] redirects to ''[[Carcinus maenas]]'' |
||
*[[Baking soda]] redirects to [[Sodium bicarbonate]] |
*[[Baking soda]] redirects to [[Sodium bicarbonate]] |
||
Line 116: | Line 118: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Other languages |
|Other languages |
||
|{{R from alternate language}} |
|{{R from alternate language|category=}} |
||
*[[The Abduction from the Seraglio]] redirects to [[Die Entführung aus dem Serail]] |
*[[The Abduction from the Seraglio]] redirects to [[Die Entführung aus dem Serail]] |
||
|{{tl|R from alternate language}} |
|{{tl|R from alternate language}} |
||
Line 123: | Line 125: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Accents |
|Accents |
||
|{{R from ASCII}} |
|{{R from ASCII|category=}} |
||
*[[Kurt Goedel]] and [[Kurt Godel]] redirect to [[Kurt Gödel]] |
*[[Kurt Goedel]] and [[Kurt Godel]] redirect to [[Kurt Gödel]] |
||
|{{tl|R from ASCII}} |
|{{tl|R from ASCII}} |
||
Line 130: | Line 132: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Plurals |
|Plurals |
||
|{{R from plural}} |
|{{R from plural|category=}} |
||
*[[greenhouse gases]] redirects to [[greenhouse gas]], etc. |
*[[greenhouse gases]] redirects to [[greenhouse gas]], etc. |
||
Note that <nowiki>[[greenhouse gas]]es</nowiki> shows up as [[greenhouse gas]]es, so it is not usually necessary to redirect plurals. However third-party websites started adding automatic links to wikipedia from their topics (see, e.g., [http://www.spikemagazine.com/free-new-books/2005/12/explorion-free-travel-books.php]). Many of them follow the opposite naming convention, i.e., topics are named in plural, and the link to wikipedia may land into an empty page, if there is no redirect. <!-- fixed a couple myself --> |
Note that <nowiki>[[greenhouse gas]]es</nowiki> shows up as [[greenhouse gas]]es, so it is not usually necessary to redirect plurals. However third-party websites started adding automatic links to wikipedia from their topics (see, e.g., [http://www.spikemagazine.com/free-new-books/2005/12/explorion-free-travel-books.php]). Many of them follow the opposite naming convention, i.e., topics are named in plural, and the link to wikipedia may land into an empty page, if there is no redirect. <!-- fixed a couple myself --> |
||
Line 138: | Line 140: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Related words |
|Related words |
||
|{{R from related word}} |
|{{R from related word|category=}} |
||
*[[Symbiont]] redirects to [[Symbiosis]] |
*[[Symbiont]] redirects to [[Symbiosis]] |
||
|{{tl|R from related word}} |
|{{tl|R from related word}} |
||
Line 145: | Line 147: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Sub-topics or closely related topics that should be explained within the text |
|Sub-topics or closely related topics that should be explained within the text |
||
|{{R with possibilities}} |
|{{R with possibilities|category=}} |
||
*[[Distributed denial of service]] redirects to [[Denial of service]] |
*[[Distributed denial of service]] redirects to [[Denial of service]] |
||
|{{tl|R with possibilities}} |
|{{tl|R with possibilities}} |
||
Line 152: | Line 154: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Facilitate disambiguation |
|Facilitate disambiguation |
||
|{{R to disambiguation page}} |
|{{R to disambiguation page|category=}} |
||
*[[America (disambiguation)]] redirects to [[America]] |
*[[America (disambiguation)]] redirects to [[America]] |
||
|{{tl|R to disambiguation page}} |
|{{tl|R to disambiguation page}} |
||
Line 159: | Line 161: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|To track statements that date quickly |
|To track statements that date quickly |
||
|{{R for as of}} |
|{{R for as of|category=}} |
||
*[[As of 2003]] redirects to [[2003]] |
*[[As of 2003]] redirects to [[2003]] |
||
*See [[Wikipedia:As of]] for more info. |
*See [[Wikipedia:As of]] for more info. |
||
Line 167: | Line 169: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|To redirect to decade article |
|To redirect to decade article |
||
|{{R to decade}} |
|{{R to decade|category=}} |
||
*[[1003 BC]] redirects to [[1000s BC]] |
*[[1003 BC]] redirects to [[1000s BC]] |
||
|{{tl|R to decade}} |
|{{tl|R to decade}} |
||
Line 174: | Line 176: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|To redirect from a shortcut |
|To redirect from a shortcut |
||
|{{R from shortcut}} |
|{{R from shortcut|category=}} |
||
*[[WP:CAT]] redirects to [[Wikipedia:Category]] |
*[[WP:CAT]] redirects to [[Wikipedia:Category]] |
||
|{{tl|R from shortcut}} |
|{{tl|R from shortcut}} |
||
Line 181: | Line 183: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|Oldstyle CamelCase links |
|Oldstyle CamelCase links |
||
|{{R from CamelCase}} |
|{{R from CamelCase|category=}} |
||
*[[DemocracY]] redirects to [[Democracy]] |
*[[DemocracY]] redirects to [[Democracy]] |
||
|{{tl|R from CamelCase}} |
|{{tl|R from CamelCase}} |
||
Line 188: | Line 190: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|links autogenerated from EXIF information |
|links autogenerated from EXIF information |
||
|{{R from EXIF}} |
|{{R from EXIF|category=}} |
||
*[[Adobe Photoshop CS Windows]] redirects to [[Adobe Photoshop]] |
*[[Adobe Photoshop CS Windows]] redirects to [[Adobe Photoshop]] |
||
|{{tl|R from EXIF}} |
|{{tl|R from EXIF}} |
||
Line 195: | Line 197: | ||
|- |
|- |
||
|From school microstub to merge location |
|From school microstub to merge location |
||
|{{R from school}} |
|{{R from school|category=}} |
||
*[[Culler Middle School]] redirects to [[Lincoln Public Schools]] |
*[[Culler Middle School]] redirects to [[Lincoln Public Schools]] |
||
|{{tl|R from school}} |
|{{tl|R from school}} |
Revision as of 19:21, 9 July 2006
![]() | This page documents an English Wikipedia how-to. Editors should generally follow it, though exceptions may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect consensus. When in doubt, discuss first on this guideline's talk page. |
- For general info on creating redirects see Help:Redirect.
How to make a redirect
To redirect a page (1) to a different page (2), enter the following on the top of page 1.
#REDIRECT [[NAME OF PAGE 2]]
For example, to redirect the Cambridge University page to the University of Cambridge page, edit the Cambridge University page and enter:
#REDIRECT [[University of Cambridge]]
Don't make double redirects (a redirect that points to another redirect); they don't work, create slow, unpleasant experiences for the reader, waste server resources, and make the navigational structure of the site confusing.
Double redirects are usually created after a move when old redirects are left unchanged and pointing towards an old name.
Another type of undesirable redirect is a self-redirect: an article that redirects to itself through a redirect.
Please note that you can redirect only to articles, not sections in them; although the syntax allows them, they don't work:
#REDIRECT [[University of Cambridge#History]]
Everything after the redirect line will be blanked when you save the page. Any text on the same line as the redirect will stay, but will not be visible unless someone edits the page.
To go back and edit your redirect after it's working, add ?redirect=no to the end of the URL for your redirect:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cambridge_University?redirect=no
To add a reason, select one of the tags from the Tag column below and add it one space after and on the same line as #REDIRECT [[Wherever]]. For example, on the redirect page University of cambridge,
#REDIRECT [[University of Cambridge]] {{R from other capitalisation}}
That will also add the redirect to the category listed in the Category column below. Note that there must be a space between the end of the redirect code and the template code for this to work properly.
More examples are included below:
What do we use redirects for?
Reason | Usage notes, and text that will be shown | Tag / Category to find articles so tagged | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Abbreviations |
|
{{R from abbreviation}} | ||
Misspellings |
|
{{R from misspelling}} | ||
Other spellings, other punctuation |
|
{{R from alternate spelling}} | ||
Other capitalisations, to ensure that "Go" to a mixed-capitalisation article title is case-insensitive |
Adding a redirect for mixed-capitalisation article titles (e.g., Isle of Wight) allows "Go" to these articles to be case-insensitive. For example, without the redirect Isle of wight a "Go" for "Isle Of wight" or any capitalisation other than exactly 'Isle of Wight' would not find the article Isle of Wight. Why: Articles whose titles contain mixed-capitalisation words (not all initial caps, or not all lower case except the first word) are found via "Go" only by an exact case match. (Articles, including redirects, whose titles are either all initial caps or only first word capitalised are found via "Go" using a case-insensitive match.) Note: "Go" related redirects are needed only if the article title has two or more words and words following the first have different capitalisations. They are not needed, for example, for proper names which are all initial caps. Examples:
|
{{R from other capitalisation}} | ||
Other names, pseudonyms, nicknames, and synonyms |
|
{{R from alternate name}} | ||
Scientific names |
|
{{R from scientific name}} | ||
Scientific names |
|
{{R to scientific name}} | ||
Other languages |
|
{{R from alternate language}} | ||
Accents |
|
{{R from ASCII}} | ||
Plurals |
Note that [[greenhouse gas]]es shows up as greenhouse gases, so it is not usually necessary to redirect plurals. However third-party websites started adding automatic links to wikipedia from their topics (see, e.g., [1]). Many of them follow the opposite naming convention, i.e., topics are named in plural, and the link to wikipedia may land into an empty page, if there is no redirect. |
{{R from plural}} | ||
Related words | {{R from related word}} | |||
Sub-topics or closely related topics that should be explained within the text |
|
{{R with possibilities}} | ||
Facilitate disambiguation |
|
{{R to disambiguation page}} | ||
To track statements that date quickly | Template:R for as of
|
{{R for as of}} | ||
To redirect to decade article |
|
{{R to decade}} | ||
To redirect from a shortcut |
|
{{R from shortcut}} | ||
Oldstyle CamelCase links |
|
{{R from CamelCase}} | ||
links autogenerated from EXIF information |
|
{{R from EXIF}} | ||
From school microstub to merge location |
|
{{R from school}} |
- Avoiding broken links (see below)
- Minor but notable topics
Sub-topic redirects are often temporary, eventually being replaced by fully fledged articles on the sub-topic in question. Be conservative when creating sub-topic redirects — they can sometimes be counter-productive, because they disguise the absence of a proper article from editors. Sub-topic redirects should only be used where the main article has a section on the sub-topic. For example, denial of service has a section on distributed denial of service. Sub-topics should be boldfaced on their first appearance in the section, to indicate that they are in fact alternate titles or sub-titles.
In accordance with wikipedia:naming conventions (precision) it's best to have an article at a well-defined, unambiguous term, with redirects from looser colloquial terms, rather than vice versa.
Some editors prefer to avoid redirects and link directly to the target article, as it is reported that redirects lower search engine rankings.
See also: Wikipedia:Template messages/Redirect pages which contains a somewhat longer list of available redirect templates
Renamings and merges
We try to avoid broken links because they annoy visitors. Therefore, if we change the layout of some section of Wikipedia, or we merge two duplicate articles, we always leave redirects in the old location to point to the new location. Search engines and visitors will probably have linked to that page at that url. If the page is deleted, potential new visitors from search engines will be greeted with an edit window. The same is true for anyone who previously bookmarked that page, and so on.
On a small scale, this applies to cases where we had duplicate articles on some subject, or lots of twisty little stubs on different aspects of the same overall subject. On a larger scale, we've had a few fairly major reorganisations:
- Moving away from CamelCase article names
- Moving away from having homepages in the article namespace (see User:Tim Starling/Redirects from : to User: for a partial list)
- Moving away from using subpages in the article namespace
When should we delete a redirect?
To delete a redirect without replacing it with a new article, list it on redirects for deletion. See deletion policy for details on how to nominate pages for deletion.
This isn't necessary if you just want to replace a redirect with an article, or change where it points: see How do I change a redirect? for instructions on how to do this. If you want to swap a redirect and an article, but are not able to move the article to the location of the redirect please use Wikipedia:Requested moves to request help from an admin in doing that.
The major reasons why deletion of redirects is harmful are:
- a redirect may contain non-trivial edit history;
- if a redirect is reasonably old (or is the result of moving a page that has been there for quite some time), then it is possible that its deletion will break incoming links (such links coming from older revisions of Wikipedia pages, from edit summaries, from other Wikimedia projects or from elsewhere on the internet, do not show up in "What links here").
Therefore consider the deletion only of either harmful redirects or of recent ones.
Reasons for deleting
You might want to delete a redirect if one or more of the following conditions is met (but note also the exceptions listed below this list):
- The redirect page makes it unreasonably difficult for users to locate similarly named articles via the search engine. For example, if the user searches for "New Articles", and is redirected to a disambiguation page for "Articles", it would take much longer to get to the newly added articles on Wikipedia.
- The redirect might cause confusion. For example, if "Adam B. Smith" was redirected to "Andrew B. Smith", because Andrew was accidentally called Adam in one source, this could cause confusion with the article on Adam Smith, so the redirect should be deleted.
- The redirect is offensive or abusive, such as redirecting "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" to "Joe Bloggs" (unless "Joe Bloggs is a Loser" is legitimately discussed in the article), or "Joe Bloggs" to "Loser". (Speedy deletion criterion G10 and G3 may apply.) See also § Neutrality of redirects.
- The redirect constitutes self-promotion or spam. (Speedy deletion criterion G11 may apply.)
- The redirect makes no sense, such as redirecting "Apple" to "Orange". (Speedy deletion criterion G1 may apply.)
- It is a cross-namespace redirect out of article space, such as one pointing into the User or Wikipedia namespace. The major exception to this rule are the pseudo-namespace shortcut redirects, which technically are in the main article space. Some long-standing cross-namespace redirects are also kept because of their long-standing history and potential usefulness. "MOS:" redirects, for example, are an exception to this rule. (Note also the existence of namespace aliases such as WP:. Speedy deletion criterion R2 may apply if the target namespace is something other than Category:, Template:, Wikipedia:, Help:, or Portal:.)
- If the redirect is broken, meaning it redirects to an article that does not exist, it can be immediately deleted under speedy deletion criterion G8. You should check that there is not an alternative place it could be appropriately redirected to first and that it has not become broken through vandalism.
- If the redirect is a novel or very obscure synonym for an article name that is not mentioned in the target, it is unlikely to be useful. In particular, redirects in a language other than English to a page whose subject is unrelated to that language (or a culture that speaks that language) should generally not be created. (Implausible typos or misnomers are candidates for speedy deletion criterion R3, if recently created.)
- If the target article needs to be moved to the redirect title, but the redirect has been edited before and has a history of its own, then the title needs to be freed up to make way for the move. If the move is uncontroversial, tag the redirect for G6 speedy deletion, or alternatively (with the
suppressredirect
user right; available to page movers and admins), perform a round-robin move. If not, take the article to Requested moves. - If the redirect could plausibly be expanded into an article, and the target article contains virtually no information on the subject.
Reasons for not deleting
However, avoid deleting such redirects if:
- They have a potentially useful page history, or an edit history that should be kept to comply with the licensing requirements for a merge (see Wikipedia:Merge and delete). On the other hand, if the redirect was created by renaming a page with that name, and the page history just mentions the renaming, and for one of the reasons above you want to delete the page, copy the page history to the Talk page of the article it redirects to. The act of renaming is useful page history, and even more so if there has been discussion on the page name.
- They would aid accidental linking and make the creation of duplicate articles less likely, whether by redirecting a plural to a singular, by redirecting a frequent misspelling to a correct spelling, by redirecting a misnomer to a correct term, by redirecting to a synonym, etc. In other words, redirects with no incoming links are not candidates for deletion on those grounds because they are of benefit to the browsing user. Some extra vigilance by editors will be required to minimize the occurrence of those frequent misspellings in article text because the linkified misspellings will not appear as broken links; consider tagging the redirect with the {{R from misspelling}} template to assist editors in monitoring these misspellings.
- They aid searches on certain terms. For example, users who might see the "Keystone State" mentioned somewhere but do not know what that refers to will be able to find out at the Pennsylvania (target) article.
- Deleting redirects runs the risk of breaking incoming or internal links. For example, redirects resulting from page moves should not normally be deleted without good reason. Links that have existed for a significant length of time, including CamelCase links (e.g. WolVes) and old subpage links, should be left alone in case there are any existing links on external pages pointing to them. See also Wikipedia:Link rot § Link rot on non-Wikimedia sites.
- Someone finds them useful. Hint: If someone says they find a redirect useful, they probably do. You might not find it useful—this is not because the other person is being untruthful, but because you browse Wikipedia in different ways. Evidence of usage can be gauged by using the wikishark or pageviews tool on the redirect to see the number of views it gets.
- The redirect is to a closely related word form, such as a plural form to a singular form.
Neutrality of redirects
Just as article titles using non-neutral language are permitted in some circumstances, so are such redirects. Because redirects are less visible to readers, more latitude is allowed in their names, therefore perceived lack of neutrality in redirect names is not a sufficient reason for their deletion. In most cases, non-neutral but verifiable redirects should point to neutrally titled articles about the subject of the term. Non-neutral redirects may be tagged with {{R from non-neutral name}}
.
Non-neutral redirects are commonly created for three reasons:
- Articles that are created using non-neutral titles are routinely moved to a new neutral title, which leaves behind the old non-neutral title as a working redirect (e.g. Climategate → Climatic Research Unit email controversy).
- Articles created as POV forks may be deleted and replaced by a redirect pointing towards the article from which the fork originated (e.g. Barack Obama Muslim rumor → deleted and now redirected to Barack Obama religion conspiracy theories).
- The subject matter of articles may be represented by some sources outside Wikipedia in non-neutral terms. Such terms are generally avoided in Wikipedia article titles, per the words to avoid guidelines and the general neutral point of view policy. For instance the non-neutral expression "Attorneygate" is used to redirect to the neutrally titled Dismissal of U.S. attorneys controversy. The article in question has never used that title, but the redirect was created to provide an alternative means of reaching it because a number of press reports use the term.
The exceptions to this rule would be redirects that are not established terms and are unlikely to be useful, and therefore may be nominated for deletion, perhaps under deletion reason #3. However, if a redirect represents an established term that is used in multiple mainstream reliable sources, it should be kept even if non-neutral, as it will facilitate searches on such terms. Please keep in mind that RfD is not the place to resolve most editorial disputes.
What needs to be done on pages that are targets of redirects?
We follow the "principle of least astonishment" — after following a redirect, the reader's first question is likely to be: "hang on ... I wanted to read about this. Why has the link taken me to that?". Make it clear to the reader that they have arrived in the right place.
Normally, we try to make sure that all "inbound redirects" are mentioned in the first couple of paragraphs of the article. For example:
- Longships were boats used by the Vikings...
- longship, redirect from viking ship
- Edvard Munch (1863–1944) was ... The broadest collection of his works is at on display at the Munch Museum at...
- Edvard Munch, redirect from Munch Museum
Don't cause a secondary redirect. They don't work like a primary redirect; same with tertiary redirects.
Self-links, duplicate links
Avoid self-links, including self-links through redirects ("loop links"). Also, avoid having two links that go to the same place. These can confuse readers, and cause them to unnecessarily load the same page twice.
Don't fix links to redirects that aren't broken
Some editors are tempted, upon finding links using a legitimate redirect target, to edit the page to "fix" the link so that it points "straight" at the "correct" page. Unless the link displays incorrectly—for instance, if the link is to a misspelling, or if the hint that appears when you hover over the link is misleading—there is no need to edit the link. Most especially, there should never be a need to replace [[redirect]] with [[direct|redirect]].
Some editors are under the mistaken impression that fixing such links improves the capacity of the Wikipedia servers. But because editing a page is thousands of times more expensive for the servers than following a redirect, the opposite is actually true.
See also
- Wikipedia:Soft redirect
- Wikipedia:How to edit a page
- Wikipedia:How to rename (move) a page
- Wikipedia:Redirects for deletion
- Wikipedia:Redirects with possibilities
- User:Daniel Quinlan/redirects-project
- Wikipedia:List of interwiki redirects
- Wikipedia:Double redirects (maintenance list for items to be fixed)
- Wikipedia:Redirects to be made
- Wikipedia:Disambiguation