Wikipedia:Training/For students/Training feedback: Difference between revisions
→~~~: new section |
→~~~Orientation: new section |
||
| Line 11,036: | Line 11,036: | ||
--[[User:Farabeeandrew|Farabeeandrew]] ([[User talk:Farabeeandrew|talk]]) 09:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
--[[User:Farabeeandrew|Farabeeandrew]] ([[User talk:Farabeeandrew|talk]]) 09:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
||
== [[User:Ohart3|Ohart3]] ([[User talk:Ohart3|talk]])Orientation == |
|||
;What I liked: |
|||
...I liked the step by step help, as well as the practice modules. |
|||
;What I didn't like: |
|||
...The coding is hard to understand for somebody that has not done computer codes or Wikipedia before. |
|||
;What was missing: |
|||
...One thing that was missing from the practice was what to do if your article gets flagged or ends up being taken down. |
|||
;What was unnecessary: |
|||
...The only unecessary part was the beginning of the tutorial when it is explaining Wikipedia, it could have skipped to rules and editing. |
|||
;If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? |
|||
...I think the interactive tutorial helped, but still not enough to fully get the grasp of how to edit. |
|||
--[[User:Ohart3|Ohart3]] ([[User talk:Ohart3|talk]]) 14:11, 17 October 2014 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 14:11, 17 October 2014
− −
- What I liked
− videos ... This was a very informative tutorial.
− −
- What I didn't like
− ... I can't think of anything.
− −
- What was missing
− ... I thought it covered all of the bases pretty well.
− −
- What was unnecessary
− ... N/A
− −
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
− ... I thought this was the best part of the tutorial.
− This was a very helpful tutorial because I had no idea what to expect nor how to even work this website prior to completing this tutorial.
− − --Ilingwiki (talk) 04:32, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
It was informative.
- What I liked
...It was comprehensive in its coverage.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...I think there should be a quiz at the end.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--1980na (talk) 23:46, 2 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--27.32.236.212 (talk) 07:30, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--BeCcar168 (talk) 10:59, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
Mohamed Dini (talk)My Thoughts on the orientation
- What I liked
... The videos as well as the examples that were used in the training to help me take on practice editing.
- What I didn't like
... How most of the content was described with words.
- What was missing
... More hands on videos.
- What was unnecessary
... Everything was necessary to fulfil my understanding in wikipedia.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was very easy to use with the help of the examples below and wikipedia is very user friendly.
--Mohamed Dini (talk) 03:30, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--16astrid (talk) 03:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Simplicity, topics were spread out so it wasn't all in one clump.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Shadowfaolan (talk) 10:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--49.180.171.78 (talk) 11:33, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Izzybiz263 (talk)Training Feedback
- What I liked
Informational and very helpful
- What I didn't like
Too many slides
- What was missing
More interactive aspects
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very helpful
--Izzybiz263 (talk) 11:57, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...too much words, not enough interesting
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--BaxterT (talk) 22:56, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jkwek (talk) 00:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lbea2564 (talk) 02:23, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The video tutorials that made it easier to follow, if you were tired of reading the text
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Colombo2496 (talk) 03:52, 6 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The interactive sandbox sections were a big help in learning the basics.
- What I didn't like
- Some sections of the tutorial seemed a little irrelevant to the learning stages.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought the interactive tutorials were quite helpful in learning how to use some of the basic editing functions.
--Mirdus (talk) 10:50, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Examples
- What I didn't like
... Too long
- What was missing
... Clear instruction on sandbox
- What was unnecessary
... Videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Cool --Yeonjoo3 (talk) 12:15, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos were very good and helpful.
- What I didn't like
Took too long...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was helpful.
--Callie06 (talk) 06:53, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Gher0491 (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Goipil (talk) 11:09, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was interestingly presented. And the tutorials especially the video ones were helpful. ...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Capn.Smith3y (talk) 09:53, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Amad6877 (talk) 15:20, 9 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Clear instructions, videos and interactive portions in particular.
- What I didn't like
Rudimentary format, could have a nicer UI, but still pretty good.
- What was missing
More interactive material
- What was unnecessary
-
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Terrific
--Gavbridge (talk) 00:34, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--129.78.56.194 (talk) 04:19, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the simplicity and step-by-step instruction format made complicated editing processes easy to understand.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It really helped cement new knowledge of Wikipedia editing processes. I am much more confident in applying the processes as a result of actually doing so, as opposed to just reading about them.
--ZenaAlexandra91 (talk) 13:42, 10 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Amarino1 (talk) 01:50, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Tigbits (talk) 06:52, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Afalcone12 (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Astronomiee (talk) 07:28, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very good format and well explained
- What I didn't like
A bit tedious.
- What was missing
Some real-life examples
- What was unnecessary
Thought most of it was necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Okay
--Redjar33 (talk) 08:37, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Videos complimented the written material. Not too overwhelming in terms of the amount of information provided.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked the interactive tutorial. The only bug I found was when I made a mistake editing a page and for some reason when I went to re-edit the sandbox page incorporated all of the code from the pop up screen.
--Mrwright57 (talk) 08:38, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
They had video tutorials to help you understand
- What I didn't like
it was a lot of information to take in
- What was missing
videos for all of the step by step processes
- What was unnecessary
nothing was unnecessary no comment
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--IB8207 (talk) 09:49, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nath aylward (talk) 10:06, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very thorough. :)
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Weezus (talk) 10:07, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...some of the videos didn't work
--Lmul3244 (talk) 10:13, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Naomi333 (talk) 11:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Aguo5540 (talk) 11:35, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--110.175.73.96 (talk) 11:56, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
first wiki post
- What I liked
- easy to use
...
- What I didn't like
- a little repetitive
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Eder7475 (talk) 12:12, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful --Mafroulis (talk) 13:25, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Quick, Concise.
- What I didn't like
Lack of information regarding certain parts, specific phrases used for editing, would have preferred to have been asked to login or create an account at the beginning.
- What was missing
Not much.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
N/A
--Tyront99 (talk) 13:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... cheese
- What I didn't like
... not having any cheese
- What was missing
... extra cheese
- What was unnecessary
... that feta
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... bit cheesy.. --Keatonsmith4 (talk) 02:15, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Clear and concise tutorial, easy to learn what was happening...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Extremely useful. Helped to cement the different commands in my mind...
--Milimego (talk) 03:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--129.78.56.195 (talk) 04:05, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--RemnantPK (talk) 04:43, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... optional videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Etidite (talk) 04:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jkim6485 (talk) 05:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
…Broadness of the intro, simplicity.
- What I didn't like
…Perhaps went into a little too much detail in parts.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…Was good, however the interactive box came up on different pages at times which was confusing.
--Madelinesheard (talk) 05:58, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jkim6485 (talk) 06:01, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
easy to navigate
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Klee2051 (talk) 06:06, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to follow instructions and details.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--SparkyR 1 (talk) 06:34, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Le Quyen Nguyen (talk) 06:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... very clear
- What I didn't like
... happy
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing, very to the point
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... very clear, thank you --Ghol1963 (talk) 07:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Eamonn Powers (talk) 07:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Video tutorials
- What I didn't like
...Long module
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Good
--Epin3995 (talk) 07:47, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The Wikipedia training was very helpful and I learnt so much more about Wikipedia than I thought.
...
- What I didn't like
- I don't think there was something that I didn't like.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Palliee (talk) 08:02, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very informative and well explained.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Adrianabonnibel (talk) 08:10, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jessicachahine (talk) 08:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Clotildeselienhart (talk) 09:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...it was easy to understand, the step by step instructions
- What I didn't like
...i found the practice modules very confusing with all the different symbols and ways of doing things.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... i thought it was all necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... it takes time to get used to it. --Fin83 (talk) 10:22, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rushski (talk) 10:28, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very informative and gave great examples
- What I didn't like
Introduction module was very long and was very kinda a bore to read through
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was kind of difficult considering that it was the first i have ever used it but the steps by step tips were very helpful. Just need more practice to get the hang of it.
--Ch8351 (talk) 10:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... easy to use
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lvee95 (talk) 11:19, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Simple, easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
... It was a bit lengthy
- What was missing
... Nothing that I can think of
- What was unnecessary
... Some parts were repeated which added to the length.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Pretty good.
--OscarScene (talk) 12:20, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It explained how to use the necessary functions of editing a wiki page
- What I didn't like
...it was very lenghty
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Abdul96 (talk) 12:45, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Tarantulaguy (talk) 14:42, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Asin9452 (talk) 21:41, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
That the instructions were thorough, that it contained interactive parts.
- What I didn't like
That the information will be soon lost.
- What was missing
An interactive tutorial that combined what was learnt.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing that merits a mention.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Helpful.
--Ppor2353 (talk) 23:35, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--110.146.128.100 (talk) 23:57, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Todderk1 (talk) 00:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jkwek (talk) 00:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- the interactive tutorials
...
- What I didn't like
- how long it took
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? love it
...
--KellyN.KN (talk) 01:15, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
Nomi-smith (talk)Wikipedia training
- What I liked
The depth and simplicity of the training
- What I didn't like
The coding
- What was missing
I couldn't tell
- What was unnecessary
Not sure
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nomi-smith (talk) 01:16, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Easy to understand
- What I didn't like
... Too long
- What was missing
... N.A
- What was unnecessary
... N.A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... N.A --JayTee09 (talk) 01:33, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--129.78.56.192 (talk) 01:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- how they explained how to use wikipedia
...
- What I didn't like
- nothing
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? didn't work for me
...
--Rubyz95 (talk) 01:36, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... it was simple
- What I didn't like
...a bit repetative
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
...the repition
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... it was fun and easy --Karyna.louise27 (talk) 01:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was easy to follow and well formatted
...
- What I didn't like
- It could've been condensed down and not as repetitive
...
- What was missing
- Nothing, everything was covered
...
- What was unnecessary
- It was all necessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I have not tried it yet
--Pineapple200 (talk) 01:52, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...People could talk and discuss to others
- What I didn't like
...Some information provided by others are not true or reliable
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Hard
--Michael3329 (talk) 01:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Curtis.judge (talk) 02:12, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--129.78.233.212 (talk) 03:05, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Concise information, detailed instruction.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Gaz789 (talk) 03:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nickcameron22 (talk) 03:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The detail that was provided
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...Even more training through videos
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Pemery7 (talk) 03:35, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was very helpful in understanding wikipedia editing
- What I didn't like
There was a lot of reading
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
A lot of it was very understandable
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jmer4927 (talk) 03:42, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--129.78.56.205 (talk) 03:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... sandbox and the help box at the bottom
- What I didn't like
...too long, too much information
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jekun (talk) 03:51, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Gfl3m1ng454 (talk) 03:55, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked that it was very informative in a simple way
- What I didn't like
It wasn't as interactive as it could be.
- What was missing
Interactive activities
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful.
--Monica.joan (talk) 05:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Simplicity.
- What I didn't like
Extensive.
- What was missing
Rela.ing to topics that i enjjoy?
- What was unnecessary
Page creation and editing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was okay. --Liam.jimmies (talk) 05:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Insightful and informative
- What I didn't like
...Dull and not interactive
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ying3179 (talk) 05:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Concise
- What I didn't like
Lengthy
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Really informative
--Ansaf.ahmed (talk) 06:18, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked that systematic approach to setting the tutorial out.
- What I didn't like
That you didn't have to answer anything
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
Some of the information at the beginning
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
N/A
--ArmishTechSupport (talk) 06:26, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that i am now able to utilize wikipedia properly
- What I didn't like
...nothing
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...great help very simple
--Max.barrett (talk) 06:31, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked; it was intrested
- What I didn't like
hard to understand
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
was good
Feedback
- What I liked
It was very informative
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Parbs95 (talk) 06:48, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--The real Alan Davies (talk) 07:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--GGW5083 (talk) 10:00, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Cpun4015 (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I can actually fix some article in Wikipedia where everyone access their information.
- What I didn't like
...The coding
- What was missing
...list of coding?
- What was unnecessary
...too much information therefore people tend to skip the tutorials.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Article about sports science
--Taeinjeon (talk) 11:56, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was informative
- What I didn't like
... It was boring
- What was missing
... none
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ji Won Bang (talk) 12:21, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very specific and clear
- What I didn't like
...too much content that cannot be understood all at once
- What was missing
...not much
- What was unnecessary
...all good
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...quite clear instruction, could give more practice
--Qson1401 (talk) 12:27, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very good, so that the person understands the tutorial fully. The use of the videos really help.
--Vybee (talk) 13:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rhetoric1001 (talk) 14:32, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--SonicPaul (talk) 16:04, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Ease of use, well structured.
- What I didn't like
Excessive clicking, no endless scroll.
- What was missing
Test based progression.
- What was unnecessary
Very little.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Not bad.
--Farceoffarce (talk) 21:47, 13 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The detailed and simple procedure has made me feel more confident.
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
All parts were necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Videos were great. --Akou3067 (talk) 01:19, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--QLPham (talk) 03:39, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was in short sections.
- What I didn't like
... It was too long.
- What was missing
... Actual examples?
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Acho7228 (talk) 05:15, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos summarized the accompanying text in a way that calarified the information, making it easily memorable.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I found the tutorials quite helpful.
--Kane.snowman (talk) 07:52, 14 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Clear and easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
...Uhm
- What was missing
...I don't know??
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the videos were kind of not really needed
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It worked. It was helpful and is a good introduction to the basics of editing.
--Squishy Cheese (talk) 14:33, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
krishna chalise
- What I liked
... was mostly illustrative and contains more infos.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--krishna chalise 08:07, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was useful and I will refer to it again for sure when it comes times that I will try to contribute to this site.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KTakenak (talk) 01:45, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--CourtneyStaib (talk) 18:16, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I enjoyed how everything was split into categories. This made it easier to understand.
- What I didn't like
... I thought some of the more technical areas could be explained more in depth.
- What was missing
... I think it could have included examples of articles that reach the highest level.
- What was unnecessary
... I thought all parts served a purpose.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Seloesch (talk) 04:25, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very detailed, all directions seemed mostly clear
- What I didn't like
...very long, a lot of information that didn't always seem necessary and became too much to remember
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...some of the advanced editing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Marrosann (talk) 21:41, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Everything was clear and concise. Well organized.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dwang41 (talk) 21:49, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Very thorough. I learned new things even though I've been an editor for a couple of years.
...
- What I didn't like
- Interactive tutorials left you in your user sandbox or somewhere else rather than taking you back to the main tutorial.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing important that I could tell.
...
- What was unnecessary
- It all seemed useful to me.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? See comment above about what I didn't like. Once the bugs are worked out, interactive tutorials will be a great resource.
...
--J.R. Council (talk) 01:58, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
Training Feedback
- What I liked
...Big, bold font and straight forward language!
- What I didn't like
...I had previous knowledge of editing and so did not need all info given. However, others may benefit from the info.
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...N/A
--MCRU (talk) 03:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ryanclements (talk) 15:46, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--J.marshall c (talk) 16:47, 29 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mykwan (talk) 05:26, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Clear, concise videos
- What I didn't like
There is a lot of information to take in if you are unfamiliar. It is totally understandable, but just a lot to learn in one sitting.
- What was missing
Perhaps a recap "quiz" after each module to help users remember what they've just read.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
N/A
--70.44.187.136 (talk) 16:34, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the videos that illustrated where to go and how to get there.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Djyatesusi (talk) 19:57, 30 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kvanschilfgaarde (talk) 01:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was short, to the point and divided into manageable chunks. The practical aspect of training was helpful ...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Fantastic! So much better than just reading about it! ...
--Pishoygouda (talk) 02:19, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The orientation was very informative. I liked the links to videos and additional resources.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was helpful and gave me a good sense of how to edit.
...
--Aqjiang (talk) 02:43, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive sandbox was very helpful! I found the text and instructions easy to understand, and there are just enough links to Wikipedia etiquette in the training pages that I'll be inclined to come back and reference them.
- What I didn't like
I didn't enjoy the videos and would have much rather learned through means of text and pictures or the sandbox. As such, I skipped a few.
- What was missing
A set of example pages, possibly? Though anyone could easily find them, a set of examples of what to or not to do would have been more illustrative than just text. For instance, the visual difference between a stub and a B-class article.
- What was unnecessary
The emphasis on being bold, but I'm sure that has its reasons.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It just seemed to stop working sometimes but it is a very effective tool. It's like the WYSIWYG editor, and makes a lot of sense to me.
--Dmou (talk) 03:36, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The guide was very comprehensive, but still short enough that it wasn't overwhelming.
...
- What I didn't like
- There are a lot of links in the training and it was kind of confusing by navigating us away from the page.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing I can think of at this point.
...
- What was unnecessary
- It was all relevant and helpful.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Alexliow (talk) 16:41, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Isabella.krell (talk) 16:44, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... When I linked to bold the boldness article came up (which I'm guessing is a fairly recent change) and the editing tutorial viewed this as an error. At the time, I was unable to continue. Otherwise, the interactive tutorial worked well and was helpful. --FlamingTsunami (talk) 17:47, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kjatczak (talk) 18:46, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Short yet descriptive ...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Worked Well. ...
--Sohamdhesi (talk) 23:10, 31 August 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very informative.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--OLucier (talk) 02:41, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive tutorial was helpful, as was seeing what it should look like.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
It was a little unclear what the accepted methods of starting a new page or editing other pages should be. It could have given a better step-by-step instruction of when a stub article is appropriate and what expansion to that would mean versus a DYK article.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--BSchilling (talk) 06:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...readable
- What I didn't like
... (((LINKS)))
- What was missing
... Printed handout
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...(((Challenging)))Bold textwish you could see both screens
--Samjam830 (talk) 13:17, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Cbku1987 (talk) 13:55, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I thought it was very helpful. I didn't know there were so many specific rules to editing pages and I found this tutorial very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing. I found all the information very informative.
- What was missing
...Maybe a few more examples of good article topics to start editing first.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing. I feel like everything was where it was for a reason. Everything was very helpful.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Martin.2489 (talk) 14:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very comprehensive and I liked how we were able to go to the Sandbox and try out the concepts we learned
- What I didn't like
... It was a bit overwhelming and there were SO MANY PAGES! Also that one bit with the firework noise... It was cute but the noise went on for quite awhile and it was disruptive with the video tutorial
- What was missing
... I wish there was more about stubs and seeing stubs to edit
- What was unnecessary
... The fireworks noise
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was straight-forward and very helpful. It gave us a great time to practice, although it did not necessarily correlate with our actions at the time
--Appleangel11 (talk) 16:05, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- the pages were really easy to read and follow
...
- What I didn't like
- nothing
...
- What was missing
- a helpful link lists all of the manuals for formatting for future references
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lindaticket (talk) 18:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
Post Orientation
What I liked: ...Interactive enough that I just wanted to find a topic and try it!
What I didn't like: ...There seems to be a limitless amount of things that one could write about -- duh it's an encyclopedia. Somewhat daunting, but I know that small steps are better than no steps.
What was missing: ...I couldn't tell.
What was unnecessary: ...Most things seemed relevant.
If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? ...It was good, easy to use.
--Benito103910 (talk) 19:06, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Hatigges (talk) 19:09, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the interactive approach that was used to effectively instruct new participants in using and editing Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
I did not like the videos that were provided and thought they were unnecessary to the learning process.
- What was missing
Step by step instructions on how to communicate with others on Wiki would have been helpful.
- What was unnecessary
I thought the step by step instructions that were given after the sandbox tutorial was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I liked that interactive editing tutorial, it gave great information and the step by step instructions allowed you to learn the material more quickly.
--Zephyra35 (talk) 19:28, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the videos and the step-by-step organization of the training.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was good, but got stuck or disappeared several times in the process.
--Andreabocincova (talk) 19:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The step by step interactive tutorials, the well-made videos
- What I didn't like
... The pace of some of the videos (could move along faster), the clumsy navigation
- What was missing
... More examples
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful for understanding step by step how to do something
--Lhe3460 (talk) 19:46, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...rewarding other users for their good writing & work. I'm not sure if I plan to use this highly social feature.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Hkm24 (talk) 21:12, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- the interactive sandbox was helpful
...
- What I didn't like
- I had to open all of the videos in a different web browser, there were so many links that I wanted to look at but I didn't want to stray from the orientation page
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? it worked fairly well except the last one the box covered the page so I couldn't compare if I had done all of my edits correctly
...
--Locke Perkins (talk) 21:39, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The detailed information.
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
Nothing that came to mind.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very informative. --24.112.136.7 (talk) 23:53, 1 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mwp2014 (talk) 02:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I like the interactive features that were used in the third module.
- What I didn't like
I didn't like the user interface of the orientation; it looks a bit dated and boring.
- What was missing
There wasn't anything that was missing.
- What was unnecessary
There wasn't anything unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I thought it was very helpful.
--Asp212 (talk) 04:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
…The format was very easy to follow and interactive as well.
- What I didn't like
…The video links did not work.
- What was missing
…There could have been a more thorough walk through of the editing materials available.
- What was unnecessary
…I felt like everything was necessary and it was a very comprehensive tutorial.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…It was easy to use!
--Aaie21 (talk) 04:46, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Montyhasan (talk) 04:49, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sposney3 (talk) 05:14, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very detailed
- What I didn't like
...kind of long, too many videos, got very complicated at times
- What was missing
... more pictures
- What was unnecessary
...everything is pretty necessary to figure out how to edit correctly
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...pretty helpful but I had a hard time with the "coding" stuff
--Wesselkamper.1 (talk) 05:18, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive tutorials
...
- What I didn't like
- Some repetition of information
...
- What was missing
- More interactive tutorials--like for citing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Many of the videos
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Really helpful
--Rgalts (talk) 05:23, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how there were different videos to accompany some of the topics. They made the training more engaging. I also liked how there was hand on learning, especially in regards to editing.
- What I didn't like
I'm not sure if this was just a glitch, but I had trouble with the bold link. I put the word bold into the double brackets: bold, however it always took me to the wiki article about boldness, not the article about bold. There was a pop up that said I should try again, and I did, but still obtained the same result. Is there a way to just get the link to open to the wiki article about bold?
- What was missing
I think it would have been neat to have users set up something on their own user page. Maybe involve editing our own user page as part of the training. For example, you could have users type in Hello Wikipedia, and bold it, then save to their own user page.
- What was unnecessary
For me I'm more of a visual learner, so although the training made good use of lists I still felt there was a lot of text. I definitely remember the information from the videos much better. Perhaps if there is a section with text and video, just use the video and elaborate on it further.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Overall I thought it was very helpful. The only trouble I had was with the link going to the bold wiki article, as mentioned above.
--KathyQX94 (talk) 12:44, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I very much enjoyed the explanations and examples involved with the different modules. Each one firmly demonstrated what needs to be done.
- What I didn't like
There were not enough visual examples to go along with the modules. I would of liked to see more demonstration visually.
- What was missing
I felt there was nothing missing from the training session. If there was, I will be able to notice once I start creating my Wikipedia page.
- What was unnecessary
Everything seemed necessary for the most part.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did not see the interactive editing tutorial, therefore I did not participate.
--165.134.208.196 (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Cales23 (talk) 18:29, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Helpful, easy step-by-step instructions. Helpful videos.
- What I didn't like
Some glitches with editing tutorial.
- What was missing
Nothing
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Some glitches, nice tool for learning basics.
--LHall19 (talk) 23:24, 2 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...What I liked most about this orientation was the variety of mediums it used to communicate the relevant information. The switch between well-made videos, blocks of text and bulleted lists made the training interactive and engaging.
- What I didn't like
...I wish their had been clearer, more step-by-step information about how different types of articles usually get started. It was pretty clear, but I think breaking it down into more subparts might help.
- What was missing
...See "what I didn't like."
- What was unnecessary
...I didn't feel that any of the information presented in this training was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I tried it briefly and thought it was very useful! It took some of the fear away from that "initial edit" that I will soon make.
--Magenstat (talk) 00:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
Steph.solomon12 (talk)edit training
- What I liked
...videos were helpful!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...more about the grading process
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...attempted but was confusing for me to work
--Steph.solomon12 (talk) 00:31, 3 September 2014 (UTC)steph.solomon12
- What I liked
Videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was good, but reading what to do would have probably sufficed for me.
--Nnlpz (talk) 01:35, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Great, in depth explanation of how to navigate through the cite.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...How to create a user page. That is very self explanatory.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Great help if you can't understand the steps without visuals.
--Svaughan90 (talk) 02:01, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Go through the content and do the interactive practice
- What I didn't like
Length
- What was missing
More interaction
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Zy87 (talk) 02:15, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Wodarcyk.5 (talk) 03:09, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--12thManSeaFan (talk) 04:05, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the interactive portion
- What I didn't like
... the videos
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
... the videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... i liked it --Solanki.15 (talk) 17:53, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I really enjoyed the incorporation of the tutorial videos.
- What I didn't like
... I didn't like how some of the tutorial videos went too fast assuming that the observer could follow at that speed.
- What was missing
... If anything, I'd say little quizzes would've been a nice add-on to this training, just to remind us of what we just learnt after all the modules...considering this was a lot of information to take in at one time.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was fun, but I got lost a lot since the tutorial videos were a bit quick. --Rl11ge (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kv13hu (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Fun and informative
...
- What I didn't like
- A big buggy, made my browser freeze. Had to restart several times.
...
- What was missing
- It seemed to cover everything!
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing!
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? As it warned, quite buggy. I had to avoid the rest of the interactive features to finish the tutorial.
...
--Zombiesatemyneighbors (talk) 21:22, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked learning about the pillars behind Wikipedia, as well as having the opportunity to learn some of the basic wiki markup.
- What I didn't like
I thought it was rather long. However, I do think that all the information is necessary.
- What was missing
Nothing particular comes to mind.
- What was unnecessary
Again, nothing particular comes to mind.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It worked well! I had my Sandbox opened in a different window and followed the instructions in the tutorial. I also liked the interactive tutorials!
--Cw585 (talk) 21:37, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the overall presentation of the information. Each page contained useful information in a concise manner, so the training did not feel like a chore.
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
The videos were not as helpful as they seemed
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive editing tutorial did a really good job of teaching; however, there was an issue when linking to the bold page. When I applied the double square brackets around bold, it already linked to the boldness page instead of to the typography page.
--ADavil (talk) 21:55, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very well done and informative.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing at all.
- What was missing
...Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Very interesting. It will be very helpful knowledge in anything I edit.
--Thisismyusername1994 (talk) 22:28, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...The practice article that was given to me was completely un editable, it was so bad.
--Hy13ac (talk) 23:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I like the video explanations, it showed me step by step as to where to click and what to do upon clicking.
- What I didn't like
I liked all of it
- What was missing
I don't know, hopefully everything was covered.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing was unnecessary, all the information provided was excellent
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful. I was able to make edits live and saw the results of my edits.
--Aadedoyi (talk) 23:20, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
This orientation provided an excellent overview of how to use wikicode, including supplemental videos and sandbox tutorials.
- What I didn't like
Sometimes the orientation malfunctioned and I had to reload it and find where I left off.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive editing tutorial was the best way to learn to use wikicode.
--GrandpaFly (talk) 23:32, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was split up into sections.
...
- What I didn't like
- The tutorial let you away from the orientation.
...
- What was missing
- More pictures.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Wordiness.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was pretty good.
...
--Sjoo446 (talk) 00:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--MaScott14 (talk) 00:36, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nativ32 (talk) 00:47, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Robbins.260 (talk) 01:03, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Tylercpetersen (talk) 01:08, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Video tutorials were nice, length or pages made it easy to follow
- What I didn't like
sometimes felt repetative
- What was missing
nothing that I could identify
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mzw3 (talk) 01:11, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- the videos and tutorials
...
- What I didn't like
- wordiness at times
...
- What was missing
- more videos and pictures to help convey thoughts and directions
...
- What was unnecessary
- excess words (too wordy at times)
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? very beneficial to have a step-by-step process to help with editing
...
--NMartin319 (talk) 01:31, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the modules were very straight forward and to the point; there was little wasted reading.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... The interactive editing was useful for learning the basic things like making words bold and adding text to the sandbox, but I had problems when I tried to make a link, the link worked but the tutorial kept saying I was on the wrong page; then it was difficult to get back to the orientation. --Kmarth.9 (talk) 01:48, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Grumblis.6 (talk) 02:40, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The interactive tutorials
...
- What I didn't like
- There was a bug in programming the bold link. It always automatically redirected to the boldness article so you could not officially complete the tutorial.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Really good and very helpful, with the exception of the bug.
...
--Pinkfloyd6491 (talk) 02:44, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The interactive editing tutorials and useful information.
...
- What I didn't like
- There was a bug on the "be bold" interactive tutorial when I was learning how to add a link, and even though the link went to the right page it said there was an error and wouldn't let me continue.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The length, I think it could've been condensed just a little more.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Good except for one bug.
...
--Mwong850 (talk) 02:58, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The interactive tutorial was extremely helpful.
- What I didn't like
...Some of the modules were a little lengthy
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...The videos reiterating things that were already present in the text
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Helpful
--MiaJ601 (talk) 03:05, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Tkw32 (talk) 03:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
the manner of writing "nobody does it like You" Wiki, even when it comes to training !
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
very clear and helpful
--Ozana75 (talk) 03:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Skylerd23 (talk) 03:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the detailed explanations and opportunities to practice using some editing basics.
- What I didn't like
...I didn't like how some of the information seemed repetitive.
- What was missing
...I think it would be beneficial to have a summary of this information on a page for users to go to in order to provide a central location to refer to these basics without going through the entire tutorial.
- What was unnecessary
...The large number of links away from the training seemed unnecessary and more like things I would want to look at when I was done (especially the pages for choosing an article)
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought it was very helpful to have the interactive editing tutorial allow me to see how simple it can be and know how to put the text into action.
--RunIowa (talk) 04:09, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rdusan1 (talk) 04:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The pillars of Wikipedia's rules. They establish a set of guidelines that is a great balance of lenient and stringent.
- What I didn't like
... The explanation of how to edit an existing article in the Sandbox was unclear.
- What was missing
... N/a
- What was unnecessary
... N/a
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful. Helped to reinforce knowledge.
--Xucy (talk) 04:34, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Huimin Zhong (talk) 05:06, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Djansen15 (talk) 13:22, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was short and simple
- What I didn't like
... hard to get the videos to play
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... it was good
--The Da Crook (talk) 14:32, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Harry3740 (talk) 15:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Drakeu19 (talk) 15:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The tutorial was clear and easy to understand. I know much more about Wikipedia already!
...
- What I didn't like
- It was much longer than I expected.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lh13lg (talk) 15:21, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Carolynella (talk) 16:25, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I enjoyed the videos and I thought that they were very helpful. They assisted in my understanding of the topics and points being discussed in the slides.
- What I didn't like
I did not like how all of the links changed the pages. I think that they should continue to update the orientation and make it pop into another browser automatically.
- What was missing
I did not think that anything was missing from this tutorial. I thought it was very beneficial and helpful to have before I began to edit any articles.
- What was unnecessary
I did not find that any part of the tutorial was unnecessary, all of it was useful in editing articles.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Vw13mp (talk) 17:01, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was easy
- What I didn't like
... It was not very entertaining
- What was missing
... Simpler instructions
- What was unnecessary
... The videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful --Ap14bq (talk) 18:54, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I felt that the content was accurate in the sense that it was up to date with the times and it even said that all the rules are not concrete, which is good because things always change.
- What I didn't like
...It was lengthy, but there was a lot of information so it had to be some depth.
- What was missing
...I don't think anything was missing.
- What was unnecessary
...There was not anything that I seen that was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I did not try the editing tutorial.
--GrandMasterEdit (talk) 19:26, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Canalesa (talk) 20:14, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...it was very descriptive.
- What I didn't like
...nothing
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...the videos alone helped me so I found the written part unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...it was a little confusing
--Dm14qk (talk) 20:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Vr13zk (talk) 22:00, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Gruhl.1 (talk) 23:04, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Emily Grobe (talk) 23:53, 4 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was very thorough with what we should or should not post as articles on this website.
...
- What I didn't like
- How many slides I had to click through.
...
- What was missing
- An in detail option of the computer jargon of making a page. The technical stuff is confusing to me and an easy go-to guide would be incredibly helpful.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Shelby.a.schields (talk) 00:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was informative.
- What I didn't like
...It was way way way to long!
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... Some of the pages repeated what was on the last page.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kimvalleeee (talk) 00:43, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Thorough walk-through of each step
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Fox.1030 (talk) 00:51, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I really enjoyed having the videos to watch and having the interactive editing tutorial that showed me what to do in my sandbox. I am a visual learner, so this helped me greatly
- What I didn't like
... The training very long and extensive, but I realize that it would be difficult for you to change this since there is so much to teach
- What was missing
... Nothing, as far as I noticed
- What was unnecessary
... There were times when the videos present stated exactly what I had just read from the instructions. It would probably be best to pick one method or the other
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I really liked this little tutorial! I did have slight difficulties every now and then when I missed a direction, since hitting the "go back" button in the tutorial box sent me back to a page that didn't always load. Other than that, the interactive tutorial was wonderful! --Iannelli.4 (talk) 01:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Nice tutorial
- What I didn't like
... Nothing
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Murakami.107 (talk) 01:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The Wikipedia training was simple and easy to follow, yet very informative.
- What I didn't like
...It appeared at times like some material was repeated more than once and got a little overbearing.
- What was missing
...I cannot think of anything off the top of my head that was missing from the Wikipedia training.
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the repetitive information that was presented was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I did not try this because I didn't have an account created yet.
--Canvaswrtr13 (talk) 02:16, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Xmizuro (talk) 02:22, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was easy to follow and quite thorough.
- What I didn't like
N/A.
- What was missing
N/A.
- What was unnecessary
N/A.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It worked well.
--Briekm (talk) 02:32, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos on several of the pages were very helpful.
- What I didn't like
...There were a lot of links to other pages which I think I needed to read and did read but which overall made it a bit overwhelming. Also it said it would take approximately one hour but I spent significantly more time than that and still feel like I could spend another hour easily going through the links. Some of the text was redundant with the videos and the videos much more useful.
- What was missing
...I don't think I will be able to answer this until I get into trying the editing out a bit more and find out what I am missing.
- What was unnecessary
...All of it was necessary for me.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Every time I tried the one example in the editing practice it went directly to boldness, never did it go to bold which was confusing.
--Kr13al (talk) 02:37, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Canvaswrtr13 (talk) 02:39, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Alombard.9 (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The way it broke down the rules
...
- What I didn't like
- A little too long for a tutorial
...
- What was missing
- Nothing to my knowledge
...
- What was unnecessary
- Everything seemed pretty necessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?It was alright.
...
--Sagarshamman (talk) 11:52, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The orientation was very informative and beneficial to first time Wikipedia users. Covered a large variety of questions a first time user may have.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kt13us (talk) 12:41, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
Orientation Feedback
- What I liked
The interactive sandbox guides and the detailed instructions.
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
A quick sheet of all the editing code and tricks for easy reference.
- What was unnecessary
The videos often just repeated the text.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I found it very helpful.
--Dodier.k (talk) 14:18, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ashleynaleman (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos
- What I didn't like
Editing
- What was missing
Not sure since I haven't started
- What was unnecessary
Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Liked it
--Nicbie7 (talk) 15:26, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very simple and easy to read
- What I didn't like
... the videos
- What was missing
...nothing it was great!
- What was unnecessary
... unnecessary videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... did not work well
--Bt13kybrock (talk) 15:35, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ar14bj (talk) 15:45, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--128.237.140.27 (talk) 17:42, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the video options for a more advanced learning opportunity
- What I didn't like
... How time consuming it was to continue to click the back button once a new link was opened
- What was missing
...nothing that I can think of
- What was unnecessary
...no, very informative for a new editor!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... it worked well, only sometimes was not able to detect the problem once you tried again. For example, trying to figure out how to link to the article titled, Bold, I originally linked to the word bold, and the computer new how to help but not as thoroughly as I would have liked.
--Md13sd (talk) 18:01, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Thomas.2662 (talk) 23:08, 5 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Easy to understand for a beginner.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very useful. However, the instructional boxes are able to move if you click the arrow, even if you didn't complete the task, which was confusing for a moment. It's not a big deal though.
--Hill.1770 (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The information was very detailed and informative.
- What I didn't like
It was bland and somewhat dry at times and difficult to focus.
- What was missing
All information was there!
- What was unnecessary
I feel there was some information that repeated itself throughout (choosing good articles vs. bad articles)
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was beneficial and informative, however, it did not like how it downloaded to the computer, rather than simply being able to watch and take part online.
--Sg13vp (talk) 01:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...How clear it was and how much I feel like i learned.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing.
- What was missing
...Nothing!
- What was unnecessary
...Not at all. It was very necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...That was awesome ! Very clear and also fun.
--76.68.71.13 (talk) 02:05, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kg13la (talk) 02:48, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
I give it an 8 MeetingoftheMinds (talk)
- What I liked
Clarity Interactive modules WikiPhilosophy ...
- What I didn't like
The occasional grammatical error in the advanced pages, and feeling I should not edit these pages. bold link isn't working correctly and, as a result, slips up in the interactive module. It goes to {{Boldness}} ...
- What was missing
After looking to edit the training page, I realized that I'm not sure if I'll be copy-pasting the current article into the edit field, then making changes, or if it comes up In the edit field automatically and I simply insert my minor edits. Any major changes would go in a sandbox or do we always start with a sandbox edit. ...
- What was unnecessary
I believe everything was useful. ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Good. But not easy to resume if I navigated away from it. I'm using an iPad- that may account for some lacking functionality. Also, not a technology expert. ... MeetingoftheMinds (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC) --MeetingoftheMinds (talk) 13:55, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was a good experience. I did not have idea how to edit Wikipedia and work to improve this page, so now I can say that I can do this. All the process, which explain how to use, are good. Videos help a lot to understand the process and have a clear view the ideas.
- What I didn't like
... Instruction are good although some points such as examples and "Did you know" are a little confusing and unnecessary.
- What was missing
... Some pictures can be used to illustrate ideas the context, so it can improve understanding the context.
- What was unnecessary
...In general all the points are necessary, but some points are more relevant than others.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...This exercise is great and very important because the person can practice what he/she has learned, and the same time, she/he review his/her understanding about the context and rewrite if necessary some missing points.
--Wd14bt (talk) 15:41, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Good overview of formatting.
- What I didn't like
The interactive editing tutorial was a bit confusing because I wasn't sure if I'd lose my place or not if I followed it.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- It was helpful to be able to see the sandbox and the instructions on one page rather than switching back and forth
- Sometimes the tutorial box would be displayed in the wrong place, or carry over onto a separate wiki page that I had open, so this was a bit bothersome
--Vloewen (talk) 19:01, 6 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...how it was simple and informative and the videos
- What I didn't like
...the interaction when trying out wikicodes in the editing module
- What was missing
...I am unsure because I am unfamiliar with editing
- What was unnecessary
...the barnstars at the end seemed childish and not useful
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I didn't find it useful
--Lb13an (talk) 02:47, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I like how they allowed you to try what you learned from what you read.
- What I didn't like
I thought some information wasn't explained to well.
- What was missing
A little more in depth about citing would be nice.
- What was unnecessary
I wasn't a fan of the adventure game.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I liked it because you were able to test yourself on what they were explaining.
--1992MC (talk) 02:55, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Patrick.fagan (talk) 04:28, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the interactive tutorial. It made it very practical and hands-on.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't like how I had to go back or open a new page after looking more into some details and links that was on the tutorial pages.
...
- What was missing
- Maybe a whole writtten summary in the end might be helpful.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It's the most helpful part.
...
--Sunghea Khil (talk) 05:23, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...broad perspective on wikipedia from an organisation towards the practical tools
- What I didn't like
...to fast, I think I have to check it multiple times again when I'm going to use wikipedia
- What was missing
...how you add yourself to a page
- What was unnecessary
...most video's
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Historystudent26 (talk) 10:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The easy navigation
...
- What I didn't like
- Too many steps and very time consuming
...
- What was missing
- The layout needs to be arranged. Information is everywhere.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Very Helpful!
...
--Bryanmerino94 (talk) 19:14, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
… I liked how throughout the Wikipedia training there were videos explaining different editing techniques, and facts about Wikipedia that we should remember. The videos helped make the written instructions easier to understand.
- What I didn't like
… Although there was nothing that I did not like about the training, it was very long. If the Wikipedia training was a little more condensed, the training would be perfect!
- What was missing
… In my opinion, there was nothing missing in this training. The training was very well put together, and it was very thorough leading to a successful training.
- What was unnecessary
… In my opinion, there was not one aspect throughout the whole Wikipedia training that was a unnecessary. Every part of the training was useful, and helpful in learning how to effectively edit and use Wikipedia.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
… I thought it was a very effective way of being able to try the actual editing process. It made me feel more comfortable about what I was learning knowing that I had a chance to try the actual process.
--Vs12vf (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Emmashavrick (talk) 20:12, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I especially liked the videos showing and explaining exactly how to work some of the things on Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was interesting and helpful! I found that it created great conditions for practicing step by step how to use the tools on Wikipedia.
--Kb14ie (talk) 20:21, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Everything
- What I didn't like
...Nothing
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--EmilyDuggan96 (talk) 20:53, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
In depth help on how to edit and create citations.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was helpful.
--Jc13ex (talk) 21:13, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--1992ml (talk) 21:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The video tutorials
- What I didn't like
... The links didn't work directly from the tutorial. Some regular explanations were long and confusing.
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Too much information on the pillars
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful --Kf14af (talk) 21:59, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Nothing
...
- What I didn't like
- Everything. I think wikipedia is confusing and time consuming.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- the wording and descriptions were to wordy
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It confused me. I didn't know what I was supposed to do. I tried. Maybe I am just not smart enough for it. Wikipedia wins.
...
--Jessiejohnston07 (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sp14ud (talk) 01:42, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I thought that it was very informative. All the videos were helpful.
- What I didn't like
...I'm feeling a little overwhelmed by all the little tricks I need to learn in order to reference material, cite, add photos, etc. Thankfully, I know that practice makes perfect.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kh13zl (talk) 01:55, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
it was interactive ...
- What I didn't like
...
it was a lot of reading
- What was missing
...
even more interactive activities
- What was unnecessary
...
videos that explained what could be simply read on the page
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
it was great and easy to use
--Otaylor123 (talk) 01:59, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the simplicity of the whole process. I also liked the accompanying videos.
- What I didn't like
I did not find anything I disliked.
- What was missing
Nothing. All the things necessary for basic understanding was included.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I liked it for the most part although there were a few bugs.
--K. Bautista (talk) 02:13, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The thoroughness of the orientation.
- What I didn't like
...It was long.
- What was missing
...Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jm14kq (talk) 02:16, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the comprehensive walk-through, the pop-outs, and the videos that accompanied some of the concepts.
- What I didn't like
... There were a few minor glitches, especially in the sandbox feature.
- What was missing
... Nothing I can think of.
- What was unnecessary
... Every component seems very helpful, even if I am not ready to put it to use yet.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... While buggy, it has the potential to be a great walk-through tool for getting one's 'wiki sea-legs'. --Ceaseandexist (talk) 02:19, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos
- What I didn't like
How much text there was to read through
- What was missing
I'm not sure if anything was
- What was unnecessary
All of the text
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I didn't
--Pww264 (talk) 02:47, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was informative.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Caro.woods95 (talk) 02:50, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Obrugal08 (talk) 02:52, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kd14hf (talk) 14:44, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jg11pv (talk) 15:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The orientation is pretty clear and understandable.
- What I didn't like
...I liked everything
- What was missing
...Nothing was missing
- What was unnecessary
...Everything was necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked the interactive tutorial but I think it could be improved adding more information on it, because they are pretty short.
--Deborahlelis (talk) 20:51, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the slides and subtitles of everything, it gave a better understanding
- What I didn't like
...All the editing techniques are very hard to understand but will come with experience
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rb14kabrock (talk) 22:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... videos
- What I didn't like
...many pages to click through
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
...videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...laggy
--Ss13zf (talk) 22:30, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was very organized, easy to follow and kept your place if you needed to come back to it. The videos were also helpful.
- What I didn't like
The module was pretty long and used a ton of new words only pertaining to Wikipedia. It would be nice to have a similar introduction to all the new words and concepts.
- What was missing
More pictures.
- What was unnecessary
Stuff about being respectful online.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Helpful. Gave a great visual.
--Hw13na (talk) 22:49, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ba13qy (talk) 23:22, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Went through all of the basics
- What I didn't like
...There was so much information all at once that it is difficult to remember
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was good
--Mh14wc (talk) 00:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Links to youtube, thorough explainations
- What I didn't like
... Length of training
- What was missing
... Someone talking me through it would have been more helpful
- What was unnecessary
... N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked it!
--Ek13ld (talk) 00:20, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Very user friendly and easy to get into, great for a newcomer.
...
- What I didn't like
- Would move alittle too fast at times and had difficulty finding some of the keys to create proper edits.
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Hightlight of the tutorial, it was like practicing a math formula you just learned, very helpful and completed the experience.
...
--Zk13be (talk) 00:59, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
it was very informative
- What I didn't like
some of the tutorials did not work
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
The youtube videos that conatiend no important information
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was helpful but not always working
--KL5607445 (talk) 01:16, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- This orientation was very informative, providing me with detailed instructions for editing articles. I think the Editing Cheatsheet is a great tool that I can easily access when I need help bolding text, creating bulleted lists and so forth.
...
- What I didn't like
- There is nothing that comes to mind.
...
- What was missing
- Absolutely nothing!
...
- What was unnecessary
- Everything was beneficial for me.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a fantastic way to put what I learned into practice.
...
--As13sx (talk) 03:06, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ak13sn (talk) 03:32, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Cnorton1 (talk) 07:28, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...interactive editing tutorial
- What I didn't like
...Editing tools are more difficult to memorize than policies, yet they have fewer illustrations
- What was missing
...not enough exercises
- What was unnecessary
...the contents of the videos overlap with that of the text
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...More helpful than just explaining with words
--Liu, Y. 90 (talk) 07:46, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The thorough step-by-step instructions and videos
- What I didn't like
...I liked everything
- What was missing
...Nothing that I can think of
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Great hands on experience. I think that I may have been a little lost without it
--Adrianna Mathis (talk) 14:14, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I really liked all of the spots where we could practice what they were trying to teach us. That way we feel confident about doing it for real. As well all of the videos created a deeper understanding of the content. I also enjoyed how they kept track of our progress as we went through the training.
- What I didn't like
... It was a lot of information all at once.
- What was missing
more pictures would be nice
- What was unnecessary
clicking the arrow every time you had to switch. Making scrolling for sections would have been better
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was very helpful in understanding how to properly do all of the tasks on wiki
--Sg13bc (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked how the tutorial went through how to do things step by step.
- What I didn't like
... There was nothing that I didn't like.
- What was missing
... There was nothing missing.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I loved it. It really helped me try to understand what I was doing.
--Jhf893 (talk) 17:25, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... That I learned something new that i had never been exposed to before.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I found it to be confusing at first, but helpful over all.
--Dg14pv (talk) 20:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kd14hf (talk) 22:07, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very in depth about how to use one's own page. Also provided a guideline on the side and went through each step.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It helped me best because now I know how to actually perform these tasks.
--Deirdre.romer (talk) 23:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Adnotatia (talk) 00:36, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Fairly easy to understand.
...
- What I didn't like
- Too many links, things were summarized, but then I had to read about them elsewhere.
...
- What was missing
- More explanations in fewer places.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The numerous links.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--LingAnthNerd (talk) 03:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...How to add pictures and how to cite on wiki page
- What I didn't like
...Somewhat repetitive
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ns14cj (talk) 04:45, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sachels (talk) 13:41, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The interactive tutorials were helpful
- What I didn't like
...The process seemed a bit complicated
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was helpful to see the process in action
--Notmrjones (talk) 14:16, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How much detail was included in each of the modules. I also liked how Wikipedia went the extra mile and included additional videos for more help.
- What I didn't like
... I didn't like the "welcome and introduction" module.
- What was missing
... There could have been a little more detail about the topics that are available to choose from when editing an article.
- What was unnecessary
... The "welcome and introduction" module was a little long and felt unnecessary to me.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I didn't try it. --Emily.fisher94 (talk) 17:30, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It covered all the basics very succinctly.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was fun practicing those skills in my sandbox! Its helps me retain the information when I apply skills instead of passive listening.
--Annamargit (talk) 20:32, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was a very comprehensive look at the basics of Wikipedia.
...
- What I didn't like
- It was slightly verbose and redundant at times.
...
- What was missing
- On screen editing tutorial instead of leaving to a sandbox.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--EricB.UND (talk) 00:10, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how it step by step covered every little detail about how to use wiki
- What I didn't like
too much reading not enough tutorials showing how.
- What was missing
more tutorials
- What was unnecessary
the quote by joseph.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
did not try it.
--Mo14rnn (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Czeer (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how the training was laid out step by step outlining a great amount of detail.
- What I didn't like
There was not much I didn't like as it was very informative and helpful.
- What was missing
I felt it outlined the basics and therefore, I feel nothing was missing.
- What was unnecessary
The quote I felt was unnecessary because it wasn't as helpful as the rest of the training and found it to be pointless.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
Cv14bk (talk) 00:55, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
How clear and concise all of the instructions are.
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
Actual direction to the parts needing to be clicked. For example, consider moving the pop-up windows that walk users through different stages to the actual areas they are directing a user to go. This could clarify even more and make it more understandable.
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It's very helpful to learn by doing.
--Charlimckee (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
overall it was fine. ...
- What I didn't like
many pages could be combined, it felt like I had to click unnecessarily to go between pages. keeping all the text in one little box just felt unecessary. some of the information was presented differently/used different nomenclature/etc compared to what was presented in the editing brochure. The brochure by the way was excellent. ...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
it had some issues where it seemingly expected links to go to places they didn't. The bold link took me to the page for Boldness not Emphasis (typography), although the Emphasis page claims that bold should redirect there... ...
--Jaxsun (talk) 04:44, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--JeheliO (talk) 16:32, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sbernt13 (talk) 19:13, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was all very good!
...
- What I didn't like
- Nothing, it was all good for me.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- I did not try it, I just used another tab on my browser.
...
--Scout37 (talk) 19:43, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--TheTurf (talk) 22:41, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Chiver620 (talk) 02:51, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very informative.
- What I didn't like
... Can't think of any dislikes
- What was missing
... More video.
- What was unnecessary
... Can't think of anything that was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very descriptive.
--AEsquibel23 (talk) 04:22, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dk802 (talk) 04:29, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Elizabethrivelli (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Karlfinai (talk) 16:58, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bryan Wicker (talk) 17:33, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the follow-along tutorials and how a completed tutorial in the sandbox was rewarded with fireworks sound effects.
- What I didn't like
...I felt like I was receiving too much information at one time.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought it was very helpful, though I struggled with linking the text for some reason, even though I followed the directions specifically.
--Jcbjaw12 (talk) 21:38, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The video tutorials were very helpful
- What I didn't like
...Nothing
- What was missing
...Everything seemed very thorough
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Unfortunately, I wasn't logged on, so I was unable to try the interactive editing tutorial.
--Deliirving (talk) 21:49, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kmutley (talk) 22:03, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- it was simple and concise
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- maybe less videos, they felt repetitive.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...pretty useful
--Ae482 (talk) 02:25, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Detailed and specific training was good then.
- What I didn't like
... A little complicated. So it was difficult to understand.
- What was missing
... More specific example.
- What was unnecessary
... It was all necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I think it is more practical than just explain. It was easy to understand.
--Jihyun2p (talk) 04:18, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...informative
- What I didn't like
... not interactive
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mccordj (talk) 16:05, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- step by step process
...
- What I didn't like
...when I finished tutorial I couldn't find my way back to my training
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...all of this
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... couldn't find my way back to training --Liannahosein (talk) 20:14, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--CaityJanelle (talk) 22:15, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Breaks things down well, good way to figure out where to start with the site.
- What I didn't like
... I feel like the information having to do with coding could be broken down a bit more in terms of editing.
- What was missing
...Everything involved seemed important.
- What was unnecessary
...nothing. All was necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--RekishinoJinrui (talk) 22:19, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The training was very helpful. Thank you.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Wilson.3308 (talk) 00:49, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ollin nahui (talk) 01:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lucyinthesky123 (talk) 03:51, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the windows with a step by step explanation, and that each window was not too long
- What I didn't like
... once I clicked on some of the example links, eg. Sandbox, it was not obvious or even possible to get back to the main page, maybe this was part of the glitches mentioned.
- What was missing
... easy examples along the way
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
ok, but not fun, it is not obvious where you have to click, even finding the B for bold.
- What I liked
...The training and the videos were very informative.
- What I didn't like
...I liked everything.
- What was missing
...Nothing was missing from the training.
- What was unnecessary
...The username video was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It taught me how to edit quickly.
--AVR22 (talk) 05:50, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive editing tool
- What I didn't like
repeated a lot of information from the Wiki handouts
- What was missing
more examples to illustrate certain points
- What was unnecessary
Videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful to be able to practise the skills immediately!
--Bibliophileb (talk) 07:02, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos and the interactive tutorials!
...
- What I didn't like
- I loved it all!
...
- What was missing
- Some exercises, I think.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- Brilliant!
...
--TQGrey145 (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
How laid out everything was.
- What I didn't like
Sometime it was hard to tell what characters are needed to be typed and which ones were just the example.
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KMacClellan (talk) 16:37, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
interactive module was very helpful
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--JuhieAhmed (talk) 18:21, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
There were example videos to show how exactly to perform certain functions like linking and editing pages.
- What I didn't like
...
Some of the instruction pages were edited by other users with their practice edits and that looks less professional.
- What was missing
...
N/A
- What was unnecessary
...
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
It was useful and interactive, but could have had a smoother flow into the next sections of training.
--Bhongwiki (talk) 21:03, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Keithpaulmedelis (talk)Thanks, all good. Much to be looked back upon soon.
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Keithpaulmedelis (talk) 23:28, 14 September 2014 (UTC)
Jessiechapman (talk)comments on 'orientation'
- What I liked
...comprehensive
- What I didn't like
...I had trouble navigating back to the tutorial when I clicked on linked words
- What was missing
...I'm not sure, perhaps access to a savable wikicode cheatsheet
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked it, and did not encounter any bugs. I enjoyed receiving a 'cookie' at the end.
--Jessiechapman (talk) 01:38, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive editing.
- What I didn't like
The videos, preferred doing the interactive aspects more.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Great, best way to learn Wikipedia.
--Christina papadopoul (talk) 03:04, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Interactivity
- What I didn't like
Reading the laws in the beginning
- What was missing
nothing
- What was unnecessary
nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
it was helpful (CourtneyStaib (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)) --CourtneyStaib (talk) 03:09, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Wikipedia is a very professionally done resource center then I though it was.
- What I didn't like
...As a foreign student, English is not my first language. it took me awhile to read the training program.
- What was missing
... It's a pretty solid system. no comment on this
- What was unnecessary
...none
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It's a good way to present its idea and it has clear explanation to help the wiki newbies get their hands on.
--Ilingwiki (talk) 04:31, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the helpful visual aids.
- What I didn't like
...There wasn't anything that I did not like. Everything was pretty much useful and helpful.
- What was missing
...I did not notice anything missing.
- What was unnecessary
...Maybe the slides that had information that was said in the videos, becomes repetitive.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I have yet to try the interactive editing tutorial. I will go back to it.
--Dollywei (talk) 04:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the help videos showing step by step what to do. Also the extra links.
- What I didn't like
...Not as much general format of links or examples.
- What was missing
...examples with more than one word.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing that I can think of.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bsaf (talk) 05:00, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the tips and how easy it was to navigate while doing the training.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...I think it would have been helpful to show more clips, i liked being able to watch how everything worked instead of just reading it and trying to figure it out on my own.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Monica Parisi (talk) 05:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... A lot simpler than I expected
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Scrubbing (talk) 05:26, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...What i liked was that the training was filled with details and made it a bit easier to understand.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Arleneperez (talk) 11:40, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I enjoyed completing the editing module. Learned many useful tricks on how to edit in Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
... There wasn't really anything in particular I didn't like. The entire orientation was extremely helpful.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I know. It basically touched down on all the key points.
- What was unnecessary
... Again I couldn't find anything that I would call unnecessary. This was all newly provided information to me so I wouldn't call anything unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I did not try the tutorial because I did not want to lose my progress, but I'll be sure to go back and try it.
--JohnSZuluaga (talk) 12:24, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How it covered all of my questions.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... I don't think anything was missing.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I liked how hands-on it was. It really took you step by step to learn everything which was very helpful. --VSummer (talk) 12:47, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The Sandbox tutorials. It was a good "do-it yourself" introduction to editing
...
- What I didn't like
- The basic editing section was a little long. It could be broken into more subsections for users to skip if they feel confident in their abilities.
...
- What was missing
- Maybe a very basic introduction and video to a new user home page and what each link is at the top. It would just be nice to have a general walk through.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Love it!
...
--Jsattler07 (talk) 14:35, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the step-by-step process that was easy to follow by navigating with the arrows. I learned a lot from a very well ordered orientation. Thank you!
- What I didn't like
...I couldn't get the videos to work, but that could be due to the lack of tech skills. So I just watched them on YouTube like it said.
- What was missing
...Honestly I don't think anything was missing, it was a very thorough orientation, and will probably refer back to it while I edit my article
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--BrandonMitchellOliver (talk) 17:19, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Baptiste fassin (talk) 17:42, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very detailed, included examples and picture that really helped.
- What I didn't like
... I thought there was too much wording. Simpler and more to the point would've been more effective.
- What was missing
... Color. The black and white layout was plan and made me lose a little interest.
- What was unnecessary
... The excessive wording.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I didn't try it. --1994ms (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The information was well stated and easily understood. I enjoyed the video attachments as well as the links to further editing information.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Psycschool (talk) 20:01, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very clear and well organized
- What I didn't like
...It will take me a while to get used to the code
- What was missing
- not much
...
- What was unnecessary
- the video about the edit button
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?very helpful!
...
--Clord18 (talk) 20:14, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- stuff
...
- What I didn't like
- eh
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- eh
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Made it easy to learn
...
--Bananaschoolbus (talk) 22:03, 15 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
…Training seemed very well organized, and gave additional information and resources that I can explore later.
- What I didn't like
…The sound quality on the videos was not very good. They were very quiet, and hard to hear.
- What was missing
…I am still a little confused by sandboxes. More information on exactly where they are and who can see them would be nice.
- What was unnecessary
…Everything seemed very relevant.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--MusingMollusk (talk) 00:09, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...There were videos to watch as well
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...it was great!
--Katiekelsey (talk) 01:25, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how in depth and detailed it was, and the videos helped clear some things up.
- What I didn't like
It seemed a little dry, but that's probably because I don't learn much by simply reading lots of text.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was helpful for me since I am a visual learner.
--Murphyaeliz (talk) 01:43, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The walk-through/cool interactive tools that led me through editing
- What I didn't like
The modules trying to explain editing without showing it.
- What was missing
Maybe quotes, the cool side bars, the really advanced stuff.
- What was unnecessary
It all helped me, I thought it was all necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I really like the interactive tutorial, because it showed me how to do things rather than try to explain it in a complicated way.
--Kellypm94 (talk) 01:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the explicit explanations on how to use everything.
- What I didn't like
...some editing is very confusing.
- What was missing
...more examples.
- What was unnecessary
...nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Stephvau (talk) 02:47, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Found it difficult to go from the interactive editing tutorial back to the Student Tutorial. --Cnorton1 (talk) 03:07, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- ly short amount of time
The concise nature of the tutorial===lots of info in a relative .Loved the videos...very helpful..
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of
It was just ok --Lf480 (talk) 03:36, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Spacemansuit (talk) 03:42, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked that the tutorial was kept concise and easy to understand. It could have portrayed editing Wikipedia as very complicated.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rjmcd3010 (talk) 04:26, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive tutorial portions, they helped guide me through the actual process of editing.
- What I didn't like
The cheesy rewards for each module...
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
--A mzungu (talk) 08:31, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Doddsjennifer (talk) 08:55, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--AnatuZeder (talk) 14:35, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was very approachable for a beginner.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
- There was too much info about choosing articles to edit.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Janevoss (talk) 17:21, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lauraelizabeth95 (talk) 18:06, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The videos were incredibly informative.
- What I didn't like
... Long and used words that were somewhat confusing
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
... Very long
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kfruiz (talk) 18:14, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked that we were taught how to do both basic and advanced editing.
- What I didn't like
There is nothing I can think of that I disliked.
- What was missing
I do not think anything was missing.
- What was unnecessary
I thought it was unnecessary for it to take as long as it did.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did not try it
--Lauraelizabeth95 (talk) 18:18, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Interactive editing tutorial, and YouTube video.
- What I didn't like
wiki code.
- What was missing
Not all the sections have interactive editing tutorial.
- What was unnecessary
links that jump to other pages.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Great for learning, pick up material a lot faster than reading alone. --Jiangw17 (talk) 18:59, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Deirdre.romer (talk) 21:50, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nnassr (talk) 04:05, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...FAQ
- What I didn't like
...To be confused
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
... photo of personal user
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...ok it good. thanks
--Mudassarhusain01 (talk) 15:12, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
it was short
- What I didn't like
nothing it was a great tutorial
- What was missing
nothing was missing
- What was unnecessary
everything was necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
very cool
--1993pg (talk) 15:40, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Hansheat (talk) 16:29, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Zhmurcha (talk) 18:55, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I enjoyed the tutorials and videos, which illustrated nicely the content described.
- What I didn't like
The first tutorial was a little glitchy (the basic on on editing, bold, and Wikilinking)
- What was missing
How to find another user's user page (which might be especially helpful for class projects, when a student wants to find the teacher's page or vice versa)
- What was unnecessary
Nothing. This was all incredibly useful information.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
See note above!
--Nadinecross78 (talk) 20:41, 17 September 2014 (UTC)nadinecross78
- What I liked
... the explanation on how to edit bold p, creat links
- What I didn't like
... nothing
- What was missing
... edit the layout of a page
- What was unnecessary
... nothing is unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I cannot open the interactive tutorial on iPad --C2zhaobi (talk) 20:54, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The ease and straight forward nature of the tutorial
...
- What I didn't like
- I'm a visual learner so text is not the best means of explaining something
...
- What was missing
- More visual or video based explanation.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing, the tutorial in terms of content seems to touch all bases.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Overall good presentation of the skills needed to add an augment different pages. ...
--EthanBazos (talk) 21:19, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the interactive learning experience.
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was fun
--KurukaNyuki (talk) 23:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Liuxia26 (talk) 00:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Spacemansuit (talk) 03:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- is that is very clear and easy to understand. videos are great source for understanding
...
- What I didn't like
- too long
...
- What was missing
- it will be good if one can actually practice on a sample it will be easier to memorize
...
- What was unnecessary
- none
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--1985ap (talk) 03:00, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Razcam (talk) 07:09, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Learning about all of the features.
...
- What I didn't like
- Some features probably won't apply to me.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Excessive features
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good.
...
--Lainov (talk) 18:45, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was very informative!
- What I didn't like
... I can't move the pop-up windows
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was helpful!
--Slarrab (talk) 19:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The Wiki markup cheat sheet was very helpful for covering the formatting of how to get certain markups. I also like that there are multiple ways to ask for help when either picking out topics or needing help in editing. The talk board will be great for discussions and deciding whether to continue on a certain path or veer in another direction.
...
- What I didn't like
- There was not anything that I can say I did not like. It was all rather informative.
...
- What was missing
- I do not believe anything was missing, however I am a first time user.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I tried it but was not able to get it to work.
...
--Alexisyos (talk) 19:57, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Durantulaa (talk)Wikipedia Orientation
- What I liked
... What I liked most about the training course was the ample amount of examples used to get points across and videos and pictures to visually show exactly what they meant.
- What I didn't like
... The only thing I didn't like about the tutorial is that it didn't provide us with enough videos. In every module sectioning, there should have been a video on every other page.
- What was missing
... There were a few images and videos that should've been placed to explain some things more thoroughly.
- What was unnecessary
... The first two slides in the first module was unnecessary because it was more of a common sense thing that didn't require a tutorial.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Durantulaa (talk) 20:08, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Durantulaa (talk)Wikipedia Orientation
- What I liked
... What I liked most about the training course was the ample amount of examples used to get points across and videos and pictures to visually show exactly what they meant.
- What I didn't like
... The only thing I didn't like about the tutorial is that it didn't provide us with enough videos. In every module sectioning, there should have been a video on every other page.
- What was missing
... There were a few images and videos that should've been placed to explain some things more thoroughly.
- What was unnecessary
... The first two slides in the first module was unnecessary because it was more of a common sense thing that didn't require a tutorial. Durantulaa (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Durantulaa (talk) 20:10, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The videos were really helpful.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Helped me understand the editing directions.
--MichelenaOctavia (talk) 20:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...All the basics were laid out for me, leaving me with what I think is enough information to get started.
- What I didn't like
...The tutorials were a bit unhelpful; one of them got screwed up and I had no idea how to get back to where I had been.
- What was missing
...I have no idea what additional information is needed as I haven't yet started to edit.
- What was unnecessary
...Again, I have no idea.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Buggy.
--TortugaEnojada (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The translation of Chinese language is helpful and correct.Mengsun945 (talk)
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mengsun945 (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked the tutorials that led me throught the process.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... Maybe add more examples
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing, I felt it all was quite helpful
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked it alot, found it helpful
--Jwill74 (talk) 20:15, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked that this tutorial is very specfic and gives explanations on how do do the major concepts of Wikipedia
- What I didn't like
... I did not like that the editing styles were on two different pages
- What was missing
... I think everything that I needed to know was there
- What was unnecessary
... I think that some of the information, while nice to know, was unnessacary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought it was easy to use after the tutorial
--Rmpatel9 (talk) 20:16, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The orientation was very broad and covered important knowledge and skills needed to properly edit Wikipedia.
- What I didn't like
In some areas, I think the orientation was too broad. For example, in the five pillars section, it provided the guidelines, but didn't elaborate very thoroughly.
- What was missing
Only very specific information that may have been covered in videos anyway.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing felt unnecessary. All the information was valuable for editors.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did not try it.
--Dhechuis (talk) 20:17, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Everyone can edit wikipedia and correct it.
- What I didn't like
...Other people may edit what I edit as my favourate part
- What was missing
...About the copyrighr of pictures
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It is helpful and get to knwo more about Wikepedia
--ZangAnqi (talk) 21:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The step by step guides
- What I didn't like
... Unable to read the guide and edit on the same page without opening a new window
- What was missing
... I think a full walk through in sandbox mode and editing would be helpful
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was ok though i would have liked it better if you you could have worked/guided is through that for everything.
--Shadowbolt7 (talk) 23:28, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--JLebowski94 (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Conner Johnson (talk) 02:09, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked how videos were provided to accompany text. This made it easy to follow along after reading each section. I also liked how there were interactive editing tutorials.
- What I didn't like
- I did not like how you had to keep manually opening up each link separately (to avoid losing your place in the tutorial).
- What was missing
- I think that more interactive editing tutorials should be added. I would have preferred an interactive tutorial for every section. As well, a potential quiz or review at the end would have been a wonderful learning tool.
- What was unnecessary
- I do not think anything was unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- I really appreciated the effort it took to create the interactive editing tutorials. I thought it was a great learning tool to become oriented with Wikipedia as well as with all the tools and services it has to offer. For myself, I thought that these interactive tutorials were more useful than the videos, since they allowed for hands-on practice.
--Student.richard (talk) 02:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was thorough and helped along each step of the way
- What I didn't like
... It was a bit too lengthy
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...The social pages
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Awesome
--Emmaleighrose1992 (talk) 03:36, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive
...
- What I didn't like
- one of the links were not working
...
- What was missing
- nothing
...
- What was unnecessary
- Can't think of anything
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... As mentioned earlier, one link wasn't missing
--Oksoha (talk) 04:13, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--BrandonAndrews (talk) 04:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Clucomm (talk) 04:59, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mattgarv (talk) 05:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that all of the information was broken up into small segments so that I was not overloaded.
- What I didn't like
... The only thing that I didn't like was how long it took, but I understand that this is a long and in depth process and that it needs to be taken seriously.
- What was missing
... I don't believe that there was anything missing.
- What was unnecessary
... I do not believe that there was any information that I did not find helpful.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I liked the interactive editing tutorial because it was like having someone with you to personally walk you through everything. --Takemetothebeach (talk) 06:51, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked how in-depth the training was, and how a large range of topics was covered. The tutorial videos were also very helpful.
- What I didn't like
... Though the training was helpful, it was too long and comprehensive for new users like myself.
- What was missing
... Everything seemed right to me.
- What was unnecessary
... Perhaps all of the video tutorials, maybe edit some out.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--AlliH14 (talk) 08:23, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...it was easy to follow
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Icekubes17 (talk) 16:16, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The videos
...
- What I didn't like
- nothing
...
- What was missing
- Have a create an account section
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Amcook14 (talk) 16:34, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The information given in the orientation was very detailed and helpful.
- What I didn't like
Alot of pages, maybe too much information for a beginner.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
Some of the shorter pages/slides with little information.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Very helpful.
--Thewitt1 (talk) 17:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the interactive training
- What I didn't like
...I wish there were more videos
- What was missing
...When the training doesn't allow you to go to other pages.
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing comes to mind
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I wish the graphics looked better, but nothing else.
--Sgipson13 (talk) 17:30, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The way each module was explainedDionnecoe (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dionnecoe (talk) 17:37, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Very helpful --Waleed Shahid1 (talk) 20:35, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... very helpful!!
- What I didn't like
...long though
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...loved it!!
--Sjensen3 (talk) 22:12, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I have a much better understanding of the requirements and the ways to edit articles.
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful.
--Sarahmey (talk) 22:22, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Straightforward
- What I didn't like
Interactive bits were buggy
- What was missing
Finished interactive bits
- What was unnecessary
Not much; fairly brief
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
A little buggy, I found the regular, non interactive tutorial better. I think it has potential though!
--AtlasCaproni (talk) 00:27, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the videos were very helpful and the interactive tutorials.
- What I didn't like
...was how the sections were subdivided, there should have been a more specific title than advanced section.
- What was missing
...a pdf version of the instructions for editing features for future reference.
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was great and really solidified learning.
--Brendanguyen5 (talk) 00:39, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--2602:306:831C:8920:6C09:F009:B546:AB32 (talk) 05:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
…Videos
- What I didn't like
…Links were overwhelming
- What was missing
… I was confused with where to find links to stubs that needed editing
- What was unnecessary
… Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
… I needed more practice but the tutorial was fine.
--Hansenr11 (talk) 16:48, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Easy to understand, good description, straight forward
- What I didn't like
...on the long side
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Good tool
--Stedesivank (talk) 17:20, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Informative
...
- What I didn't like
- Interactive tutorial
...
- What was missing
- More reinforcement
...
- What was unnecessary
- Everything was fine
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Still needs working on
...
--Anika.sikder (talk) 17:29, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... the youtube videos were helpful in showing how to use wikipedia
- What I didn't like
...N/A
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was helpful
--Seanaleys (talk) 18:53, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- easy to work with
...
- What I didn't like
- nothing
...
- What was missing
- more detailed editing
...
- What was unnecessary
- nothing
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? enjoyable
...
--DiSchamelrider (talk) 19:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Helped me put what I read into practice.
--Cjkeen (talk) 19:31, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
… The interactive edits were very useful. I felt like I was able to get a better handle on the editing process than if I just read how to do it.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…I thought the pop up screens helped me navigate the page more effectively
--Kunselman304 (talk) 21:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was very informative.
- What I didn't like
...It was a little longer than I would've desired.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I'm aware of.
- What was unnecessary
...Some of the information was unnecessarily long.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...N/A
--Tbritvan (talk) 17:39, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the interactive tutorial of the basic mechanics to try editing myself.
- What I didn't like
...The length and extra details added in.
- What was missing
...A simplified version of the information. A helpful tool to remind me of the features when editing in the future.
- What was unnecessary
...Extra details and the time it took to complete the tutorial.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I liked how helpful the interactive editing tools were, and how easy they were to understand.
--Christina Dailey (talk) 17:43, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Answered most questions & was interactive.
- What I didn't like
...Lengthy/redundant in certain parts.
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...Redundancies about the four tildes.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Helpful.
--Aasthak (talk) 18:51, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Knowing about the helpful links for getting started. Jmil226 (talk) 19:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jmil226 (talk) 19:40, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...very easy to follow
- What I didn't like
...sometimes very dull
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I really liked it, it was very helpful
--Jo v 123 (talk) 20:31, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Hdewey (talk) 22:50, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Henry150 (talk) 23:10, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ilingwiki (talk) 00:34, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It is very imformative. It allows you to practice just after learning it, which is the best way to learn something.
- What I didn't like
I wasn't ineterested in some of the things.
- What was missing
Some sections didn't have a 'practice' or a video to make them more clear.
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was awesome! A very good invention.
--Lilitiana (talk) 01:16, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lindsey Mangus (talk) 01:17, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--204.19.244.2 (talk) 03:49, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kipet15 (talk) 06:08, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The fact that there was an interactive component to the instructions
- What I didn't like
... Took a while to read through everything
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Some of the instructional videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Most helpful part about the training, great way to start getting familiar with wikipedia --JlaingIII (talk) 06:44, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked how it was simple, yet informative.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was good but I would have been easier if the tutorial opened in a new window automatically.
...
--Scowan3 (talk) 15:25, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the videos and interactive tours. They were really helpful. ...
- What I didn't like
Maybe some more specifics on referencing. Some parts of the video were unclear where info was just copy and pasted and I wasn't sure where it came from. ...
- What was missing
Maybe more interactive videos. ...
- What was unnecessary
Mostly everything was necessary. ...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I really found it helpful. ...
--Mvfarrell (talk) 16:32, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
How helpful it was
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--24.216.69.89 (talk) 18:45, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
LongliveJoy (talk)Wiki Feedback
- What I liked
... I liked how the tutorial takes you step-by-step through getting started.
- What I didn't like
... I would like a page that is dedicated to familiarizing the new "wikipedian" with Wikicode. There were only a few basic codes and I would like to know more.
- What was missing
... Like the previously stated, it needs a more in-depth Wikicode guide.
- What was unnecessary
... Common courtesy was overstated. I understand that Wikipedia is edited by people and people can be cruel, but it was overkill.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was nice that each step was right there and you could get a feel for editing right away. --LongliveJoy (talk) 19:18, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I think that is was a very helpful guide and showed a very basic guide to what to expect for editors of the site
- What I didn't like
...Nothing really
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KoreanThunder17 (talk) 21:26, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Sean McKnight (talk) 00:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...interactive module
- What I didn't like
...code
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...nice
--Secahill (talk) 01:32, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kmarc94 (talk) 01:40, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It showed me how to edit things on Wikipedia and did it at a very nice pace
- What I didn't like
...no complaints really, overall it went pretty well
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...the last couple of pages in module 4
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--THENEXTLEVEL94 (talk) 03:53, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...short pages of the module
- What I didn't like
...pretty extensive for an intro
- What was missing
...summary page of what's crucial to know
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--165.134.208.184 (talk) 04:26, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... learning how to write and edit statements
- What I didn't like
... i didn't like the reading it
- What was missing
... nothing was missing in my opinion
- What was unnecessary
... nothing really
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... its good. it shows me how to really do it and walk me through step by step --Manaiaperese41 (talk) 13:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked all of the tutorial videos, and how they coincided nicely with the written text.
- What I didn't like
I did not like the hands-on tutorials. They did not work for me and I felt like I was being rushed.
- What was missing
If there was a spot where we were shown how to d something, then had to actually do it (for the more difficult tasks), I feel that could be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
Some of the extra links. They were distracting on the pages.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
They didn't work well for me.
--Lohlin (talk) 13:54, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I enjoyed the interactive tutorials.
- What I didn't like
...The videos didn't have as much information about the topics as they could have.
- What was missing
...I wish there were more interactive tutorials.
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I enjoyed it, and think it could be expanded to encompass more of the tutorial.
--Larharmon (talk) 15:29, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... informative
- What I didn't like
... it was long
- What was missing
... nothing
- What was unnecessary
... nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Aputulyan (talk) 15:34, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The text and videos were very easy to follow and understand.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...The interactive editing tutorial was great. It was very helpful.
--TroastH (talk) 15:52, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Concise, informative and very helpful starter tutorial
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Aside from the few glitches that I encountered, it was tremendously useful!
--Wendyxie99 (talk) 15:59, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Btrentin (talk) 16:04, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Anaff91 (talk) 17:39, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked that it was short with not a lot of reading.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't find it helpful. After completing the training I still have no idea on how to do anything on Wikipedia!! Also, when I tried to do the training for editing I couldn't get back to the actual training. I had to exit out and go back in to get to the training modules.
...
- What was missing
- Basic explanations from the beginning.
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? Terrible, thats what got me messed up and I had to exit out just to get back to the module.
...
--Jjl1515 (talk) 17:46, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--DmccarthyUMASS (talk) 20:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked that it was a step by step process and that it was easy to follow along.
- What I didn't like
...I didn't like when it brought me to a new page and then I lost my spot
- What was missing
...I didn't think anything was missing
- What was unnecessary
...Everything sounded necessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I thought that the interactive editing tutorial helped me a lot. It really showed step by step guidance and made the orientation go by a lot smoother
--JillSutton12 (talk) 21:57, 23 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jboyar9 (talk) 00:04, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
That the orientation answered all the questions I had going into it.
- What I didn't like
It was a little long.
- What was missing
Nothing
- What was unnecessary
Some of the parts at the end.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was very helpful. --Jwade3910 (talk) 00:27, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that the information was concise yet very in depth
- What I didn't like
...N/A
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Isabel Sarah Mitchell (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...it is clear with the video tutorial.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Phoebepoonn (talk) 05:19, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Simple step by step process of the basics. I liked the videos and being able to practice in the sandbox
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KBrajkovic (talk) 06:54, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the detail
- What I didn't like
...how long it was
- What was missing
...nothing
- What was unnecessary
...the long depth
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...how it helped me get an even better understanding --Andrew.Bechtold (talk) 13:25, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Stedesivank (talk) 14:45, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... very informative
- What I didn't like
... to many codes and symbols
- What was missing
... videos
- What was unnecessary
... symbols and codes
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... very informative and it helped me as a university student learn a new program --Mayooran.athithan (talk) 15:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
…Brief and to the point, yet educational.
- What I didn't like
…Confusing interactive widgits
- What was missing
…N/A
- What was unnecessary
…N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
…confusing, a little misleading…should have a sort of "grading" component that tells you if you have completed the task correctly.
--Jfeight (talk) 20:23, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Liamqc (talk) 21:30, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... It was interactive
- What I didn't like
... Would have liked more hands on tutorial or videos
- What was missing
... Visual aids
- What was unnecessary
... Choosing a topic
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Should be more relatable to a topic
--Clavaden (talk) 21:35, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Great overview of editing! I was interested in working on some articles before I even signed up for this class, but now I'm even more motivated to do so and feel like I have the knowledge to start with a basic article.
- What I didn't like
The pop-up guide didn't always work when I opened a link in a new window. But I was able to go back and figure most of it out.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
No issues that I saw.
--Pnwkev (talk) 23:09, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Halbero (talk) 01:33, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the editing tutorial.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I think the editing tutorial was very helpful.
--Casinobrawl (talk) 04:13, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the interactive modules that let you walk through it without any penalties
...
- What I didn't like
- there wasnt anything that I didnt really like
...
- What was missing
- N/A
...
- What was unnecessary
- N/A
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was really helpful more so than reading everything and just sitting here
...
--Bryantch12 (talk) 15:32, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The interactive tutorials.
...
- What I didn't like
- The lack of open in new tab features for tutorials.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing, from what I can tell.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The extra lines in interactive tutorials
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was a good teaching tool but it needs more flexibility to teach better.
...
--DominicRHocutt (talk) 16:00, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Natker (talk) 19:56, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... being able to do practice edits in the basic editing section.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... Being able to practice advanced editing in the advanced editing section
- What was unnecessary
... Some of the tutorial videos. I prefer interactive practice.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... This was the most helpful section for me.
--Mfate87 (talk) 20:01, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- The writing style was clear, easy to read, helpful, and at times, aptly amusing.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Menyenangkan (talk) 21:52, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was laid out very well and easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--208.186.43.98 (talk) 23:45, 25 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Liamqc (talk) 00:22, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...This was a great overview. I learned a lot.
- What I didn't like
...The section on adding references was a little unclear - I had to go through that one twice to understand.
- What was missing
...I'm not sure yet!
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Yoginih (talk) 03:03, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It was very streamlined and clear
- What I didn't like
There is a broken link when you do the first interactive sandbox tutorial. It doesn't take you back to the training
- What was missing
Adding images should be moved to the beginning editing section
- What was unnecessary
It all seemed relevant
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I liked the videos that accompany the editing text
--Jovanme (talk) 03:14, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was very informative.
...
- What I didn't like
- It was a little lengthy and repetitive.
...
- What was missing
- Video tutorials.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It was very helpful and straight forward.
...
--YaeRamKim (talk) 03:15, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Explained a lot of the legitimacy that wikipedia offers
...
- What I didn't like
- I'm not ready to make any edits yet and will have to review the basic and advanced instructions again when I'm ready.
...
- What was missing
- I don't know enough to know what's missing yet.
...
- What was unnecessary
- All was relevant
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I didn't try any of it since I will review them when I'm closer to editing.
...
--Kareagan (talk) 03:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I did it twice so I guess I learned a little more the second time.
- What I didn't like
... That I had to do it twice.
- What was missing
... I have no idea.
- What was unnecessary
... I don't know.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was pretty straight forward and simplified. Cameronpage25 (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
--Cameronpage25 (talk) 03:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The videos demonstrating the processes
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
more demo videos, maybe?
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Mushpatatas (talk) 03:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Interactive tutorial is a thoughtful way of teaching.
- What I didn't like
...Could summarize the orientation in a few slides.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Helpful, Efficient
--Gyrodrew (talk) 17:41, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Riverajoel (talk) 18:36, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
wikipedia orientation for COM 482
- What I liked
... I like all the video, it is pretty cool.
- What I didn't like
... To much information, but good detail.
- What was missing
... Not sure, what I miss.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was ok.
--Rabbit white (talk) 22:24, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
… The interactive editing tutorials were an easy-to-follow, modern way to learn how to use Wikipedia. I believe that the easiest way to learn how to do something is by following along. The interactive tutorials did just that! I also found the youtube videos to be extremely helpful. Overall, this orientation was a great way to learn how to use Wikipedia.
--Tingsonn (talk) 23:06, 26 September 2014 (UTC)Tingsonn, 09-26-2014;7:06PM
- What I liked
- The structure is clear and navigation is easy.
- Text is easily understandable.
- Videos are great and include subtitles.
- The Interactive editing tutorials are helpful option.
- The feature that displays the current page out of the total pages in that section is helpful.
- What I didn't like
I like everything about it. However, some of the pages included test edits by new Wikipedians (mistakes) which made the pages confusing. Some of these edits were not corrected for months. In order to clean those pages, I did undo some changes on one page and reverted another page.
- What was missing
It was complete.
- What was unnecessary
There is nothing notably unnecessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- I like how it is offered as an option since not everyone will need it.
- I find it very useful that it continues in a new browser tab, and that you can move back and forward through the interactive tutorial. Because it does not disappear if you mistakenly go to another page (not page specific), you can go back to the previous page and continue the tutorial.
--Hhhzzzani (talk) 23:07, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Great training! Good examples and very clear instructions. I liked the additional links provided to access more detailed information.
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kewall27 (talk) 23:21, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
helpful
- What I didn't like
too much text, maybe use bullet points
- What was missing
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--98.232.42.216 (talk) 23:23, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The interactive sandbox tutorial was very help. Things are better understand when you actively do them.
- What I didn't like
I found some points to be redundant.
- What was missing
More interactive tutorials. A tutorial on navigating around all of wikepedia (not just sandbox) would be helpful.
- What was unnecessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
The interactive tutorial was very helpful. It is much easier to learn and remember things when you are actively doing them and someone is there to help you. --Elyriz (talk) 23:29, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Interactive editing lessons every now and then.
...
- What I didn't like
- It took quite a long time.
...
- What was missing
- More pictures would be nice. I like visual aids.
...
- What was unnecessary
- The videos on the side.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? It really helps. I highly recommend it.
...
--JasminePrincess (talk) 23:48, 26 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
The tutormal was very straight forward, it was easy to grasp and start the hands on training.
- What I didn't like
There wasn't anything I didn't like, I understood the editing process and working within the sandbox.
--Checapili (talk) 00:06, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Nice and well organized, easy to follow
- What I didn't like
... coding is hard
- What was missing
... nothing that I am aware of.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Did not used it --Jonylight (talk) 00:47, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked that there were visual tutorials
- What I didn't like
...nothing!
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jetstreamjenn (talk) 00:49, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I thought the orientation was quite clear and simple to follow. The use of text, images and multimedia is excellent in that it covers the wide range of learning paths. Thoroughly enjoyed it!
- What I didn't like
...Apparently my browser could not view the image on the page. I had to continually view in YouTube format, but, it was manageable and hitting the back arrow to get back to the tutorial was simple.
- What was missing
...I cannot think of anything now... once I am a superstar wikipedian, I am quite positive I will have commentary. :-)
- What was unnecessary
... Not sure... the topics flowed and it appeared to cover the basics.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It worked quite well for me. I was able to produce the correct page easily.
--Andrew Thiessen (talk) 01:50, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Aidaja12 (talk) 04:24, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...the interactive editing was the most helpful for me
--Aidaja12 (talk) 04:29, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Very informative
- What I didn't like
... Kind of a lot of information, and felt a little overwhelmed but I think I'll have to go through the training again for future projects.
- What was missing
... I think everything was there and helpful
- What was unnecessary
... N/a
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I made my own account and just tried everything there, instead of what I think was the interactive tutorial --Jmarieg08 (talk) 19:17, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Links to videos, they seemed like they would be a helpful reference if I ever needed review.
- What I didn't like
...A lot of links, but what else can you do?
- What was missing
...Nothing
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was a very good step by step guide to edit, pretty helpful. Jswcp2015 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
--Jswcp2015 (talk) 20:31, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...The writing and video instruction was clear and concise. The tone was positive and encouraging.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Very helpful.
- What I liked
...It was very informative and straight to the point.
- What I didn't like
...Some things were repetitive.
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...The video repeated everything that was already said, although it was more helpful when seen visually.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It became easier when doing it rather than just reading/watching it.
PaulaBalondo (talk) 00:06, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was very clear and informative towards what I will be doing.
- What I didn't like
...Nothing.
- What was missing
...Nothing comes to mind.
- What was unnecessary
...Repetition, but I guess it was to help remind us of what was just said.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...Didn't try.
--Ianmills93 (talk) 00:17, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was very clear and to the point. I have a lot of information now that will be helpful in my college course.
...
- What I didn't like
- hard to say, it was very helpful
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Zoebloom (talk) 01:04, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Xxdboixx (talk) 04:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked that I was informed on how to use good manners on wikipedia
- What I didn't like
...Seems more confusing that it should be
- What was missing
...Nothing from what I can tell
- What was unnecessary
...Don't know
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I got confused
--Deanbakeberg (talk) 19:54, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
informative
- What I didn't like
too long
- What was missing
examples
- What was unnecessary
nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
sandbox stuff is nice
--2601:6:3F80:683:DD05:123F:33DC:708D (talk) 13:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
my feedback
- What I liked
informative
- What I didn't like
too lengthy
- What was missing
article examples
- What was unnecessary
nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
sandbox hands on stuff is crucial
--Hwan18 (talk) 13:30, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Brendanguyen5 (talk) 15:58, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nwallenb (talk) 20:14, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked how user friendly it was. It was a very linear presentation that was easy to move through and understand. I also liked the badges of accomplishment.
- What I didn't like
Sometimes reading a page like a stub page or a list of requested articles, it was hard for me to figure out what I was looking at. I really needed to study the text to know what it was.
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I did prefer the game over the tutorial/training just because of the fun element. :)
KateNegley (talk) 21:28, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jk1618 (talk) 14:04, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nkavish (talk) 19:25, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I really liked the demonstration videos. I'm a visual learner, so it helped me remember certain steps.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--BUKNAE (talk) 21:45, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was thorough.
- What I didn't like
...It was boring and at times tedious
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...That was the best part, the whole thing should be like that.
--Alexateo (talk) 05:55, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the hands on exercises.
- What I didn't like
...It was confusing to complete without getting drawn off course.
- What was missing
...Nothing that I could tell.
- What was unnecessary
...I found all of it pretty necessary.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I am a big fan.
--SleeepyD (talk) 06:05, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... videos
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Samantha M Kennedy (talk) 02:15, 6 October 2014 (UTC)
Rabbit white (talk) Wiki train for com 482
- What I liked
... I liked all the video that describe the detail
- What I didn't like
... I didn't like that the training was too long.
- What was missing
... I hope I didn't miss anything. Some of the link highlight in blue, I skipped some.
- What was unnecessary
... not sure.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... The tutorial was good, but just need to have some more step for the tutorial.
--Rabbit white (talk) 21:53, 6 October 2014 (UTC) Rabbit white (Linh Le)
- What I liked
detailed information and how serious is this work
- What I didn't like
too much information in short time, it is sort of complicated guideline
- What was missing
I don't know
- What was unnecessary
More assignments
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--SamiraDF (talk) 03:18, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Wikipedia Editing Training
- What I liked
It was really useful to know how I will edit the Wikipedia page. Also, I like the videos explaining the process of editing. While watching them, I could practice editing using sandbox tutorial.
- What I didn't like
Nothing.
- What was missing
Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
No. Everything seemed to be necessary and useful to know.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I tried the sandbox tutorial while watching the videos. It was awesome and very effective to follow and remember the process.
--Sh1208 (talk) 03:28, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was easy to follow
- What I didn't like
...coding like this is not what I'm used to
- What was missing
...a little more in depth about the template/picture formatting
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing, everything was helpful
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...A+ great
--Cbazinet (talk) 13:14, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nhullus (talk) 14:12, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I like the coding examples which taught me how to do anything from basic bolding to inputting images.
- What I didn't like
Seemed biased towards the idea that I wouldn't know anything about editing at all.
- What was missing
I feel like there should be more emphasis on coding for edits.
- What was unnecessary
I'm not sure that people need to be encouraged to give others "wikilove".
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Ra13chelli (talk) 01:43, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How simple it was to follow
- What I didn't like
... the videos were repetitive
- What was missing
... ...
- What was unnecessary
... The videos
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Alex Redding (talk) 03:22, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Shoelace453 (talk) 08:18, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- It was fairly simple and easy to understand.
...
- What I didn't like
- I did not feel like it being split into so many parts helped at all.
...
- What was missing
- Nothing that I could see.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing that I could see.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Lexiconjuration (talk) 18:27, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Explanatory and easy to understand
- What I didn't like
Slightly overwhelming, not sure where to go from here. Might have to read more than once.
- What was missing
Link to sandbox didn't work?
- What was unnecessary
Extra introductions or "congratulations" pages just get to the point of it straight away in a tutorial.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Have not tried yet. Might need to re-read tutorial again before that.
--Rcannon2 (talk) 00:27, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--GraLimon (talk) 01:23, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- very informative
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Kielyk77 (talk) 19:07, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...There was a lot of good information and it was easily explained to someone who has no idea how to do coding.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It didn't really work for me.
--Bmgibbs (talk) 04:51, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Pjplummer (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... I liked that the tutorial gave complete information on the basics of formatting for edits and that it talked about proper etiquette for users.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Historygirl31 (talk) 20:19, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the process of editing the Wiki page
- What I didn't like
...video doesn't work on my device
- What was missing
...how to change the contents' color/ highlight
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...it might take a few time to practice due to amont of details
--Yibo719 (talk) 21:47, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- Very clear.
...
- What I didn't like
- Tutorials didn't work.
...
- What was missing
- I can't think of anything.
...
- What was unnecessary
- Nothing in particular.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Adaar117 (talk) 22:10, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Bananasae (talk) 23:57, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Graciehope (talk)Training FeedbackGraciehope (talk)
- What I liked
...very straightforward, and quick to get through
- What I didn't like
...not sure if I'll remember the technical wikicode in the future, so constant reference to that would be awesome
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...the video about how to edit. I get that that the point was to show how easy editing an article was, but because it is so simple, I didn't see the point of a video for it
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Graciehope (talk) 00:34, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... How easy the code is once you put it to use
- What I didn't like
... Nothing
- What was missing
... Nothing
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... Worked fine for me --Nlb329 (talk) 05:06, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I enjoyed the videos being paired with text since it accommodates for different learning styles...
- What I didn't like
I didn't like how all the information was put on tiny individual pages...
- What was missing
I couldn't get most of the interactive tutorials to work...
- What was unnecessary
There seemed to be an excessive number of pages. Most of the information could be placed on the same page...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Nerd648 (talk) 13:14, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The presentation was simple/easy to understand.
- What I didn't like
...The amount of content was rather daunting, but that's to be expected.
- What was missing
...An expansive, hands-on tutorial for editing full pages and their subsections would be helpful IMO
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...The tool was a little confusing at first. After accessing my sandbox, the tutorial would not begin until I reloaded the page.
--Andrew.blackowiak (talk) 14:56, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The training was very simple and easily understood. I liked how it did not drag on and kept my focus.
- What I didn't like
... Nothing, the training was extremely fluid and basic.
- What was missing
... Nothing that I saw.
- What was unnecessary
... Everything was needed, or at least recommended knowledge. Not much was superfluous
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... We are learning web design and coding in some of my other courses. This was relatable and interesting. --KelCP (talk) 17:05, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Was very helpful and informative
- What I didn't like
...Was that it kind of stressed me out more with all the coding but the videos helped with that
- What was missing
... Nothing all good
- What was unnecessary
...Nothing all good
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KriGod110 (talk) 17:48, 13 October 2014 (UTC)KriGod110
- What I liked
... It's cool to be able to edit and use a resource I use daily.
- What I didn't like
... Wikicode seems a bit confusing, but I'll get a hang of it.
- What was missing
... Nothing.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It was a cool way to learn the software. --James.Travaglini (talk) 22:57, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... helpful with the basic functions
- What I didn't like
... some lengthy portions
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--RachelNCF (talk) 23:00, 13 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the way that it went step by step and had different tutorial videos through out the modules.
- What I didn't like
...I wished that it had more interactive parts when going through something new, instead of having to open a new tab to go to your sandbox. I am a visual learner and it would help me catch on quicker if it had something interactive.
- What was missing
...The interactive parts were the only things that I though was missing.
- What was unnecessary
...I feel it could have been shortened and not been so lengthy.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Davis2018 (talk) 02:08, 14 October 2014 (UTC)davis2018
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Rreth (talk) 03:30, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... For the most part, this was a helpful tutorial.
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
... A permanent link to the list of editing resources (a bit over halfway through the tutorial, I believe) would be convenient for future reference. Transcripts of the YouTube videos would also be welcome.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I couldn't get the interactive tutorial to load on Chrome, but the idea is a good one. --Yvaeth (talk) 03:54, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the videos. They helped make the explanations of editing and such more clear.
- What I didn't like
...the fact that there were also written explanations of things when there was a video that explained the same thing.
- What was missing
...nothing I can think of right now.
- What was unnecessary
...the written explanations when there was already a video.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...it didn't work on my computer.
--Meeshell645 (talk) 04:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Informative OrientationRisqueraiche (talk)
- What I liked
- I liked that it went through many of the different kinds of edits and that it explained that Wikipedia is not a dictionary or anything like that, but instead purely an encyclopedia.
...
- What I didn't like
- I didn't like how long it was to read. I would much rather watch a video diagramming all of it.
...
- What was missing
- I can't think of anything off the top of my head that was missing.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I thought it was all useful.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? I thought it was an awesome way to help engrain how to do various things on the website. It was great practice.
...
--Risqueraiche (talk) 04:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
Alexandra.eich (talk)training feedback
- What I liked
... the short informative videos
- What I didn't like
... the 3rd module was too long and wasn't "to the point"
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I tried to use it but the page didn't open --Alexandra.eich (talk) 15:06, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Alexandra.eich (talk) 15:12, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The training session was concisely worded and very informative.
- What I didn't like
... The interactive training tools would not operate on my system, rendering them useless to me. I very much wish that I could have used them.
- What was missing
... I still have many questions about how to format headings and subheadings.
- What was unnecessary
... Often, the video components could have replaced the text components and vice versa.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... It did not work on my system.
--Emmak96 (talk) 16:41, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Tjt597 (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- very straightforward approach, easy to understand
...
- What I didn't like
- Sandbox editing link didn't work
...
- What was missing
- N/A
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Safeldma (talk) 19:09, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- very informative
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
- Sandbox orientation was not working
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it? didn't work
...
--Ravenzoo (talk) 19:13, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Flightless13wings (talk) 19:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Orientation was informative and straight forward.
- What I didn't like
... Orientation had too much depth for a beginner to use without more visualization or interactive functions.
- What was missing
... More visualizations and interactive functions could have been incorporated.
- What was unnecessary
... Nothing was unnecessary. More information is always better to familiarize students that want to be very active in editing wiki pages.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I thought that it was very easy to follow and informative. --Flightless13wings (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...the power of editing is pretty cool
- What I didn't like
...its hard to keep up with all the codes and symbols
- What was missing
...n/a
- What was unnecessary
...n/a
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Albrch (talk) 20:36, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...easy to use, good flow of information
- What I didn't like
...the seemingly limiting recommendations for choosing an article.
- What was missing
...i don't know
- What was unnecessary
...Extensive information on choosing an article
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I enjoy the process and admire the simplicity.
--Wayneblue (talk) 22:57, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very thorough.
- What I didn't like
N/A
- What was missing
N/A
- What was unnecessary
N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Helpful.
--Noirowoze (talk) 23:44, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--2602:306:CE91:2600:E6CE:8FFF:FE2A:4714 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... Concise and informative. The videos were helpful for illustration.
- What I didn't like
... The interactive tutorials did not work with Mozilla.
- What was missing
... Nothing I can think of.
- What was unnecessary
... All information provided seemed pertinent.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... I couldn't use it due to the browser or incompatibility with Java/Javascript. --Wolfpad4 (talk) 03:25, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Kramer121
- What I liked
- The thoroughness of educating a potential Wikipedia editor, identifying how to participate correctly, and freely.
...
- What I didn't like
- n/a
...
- What was missing
- n/a
...
- What was unnecessary
- n/a
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
... n/a
--Kramer121 (talk) 05:37, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... super helpful! Cant think of anything negative or useless!
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Karaerickson (talk) 06:11, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
- I liked the way the videos explained some of the instructions. Overall, I think it was helpful.
...
- What I didn't like
- I think some of the instructions on how to edit Wikipedia was a little confusing and could use more clarification.
...
- What was missing
- I would have liked to see more videos on how to create headings and maybe a table of context. I am a visual leaner, so videos really help me and so in regards to me I would have appreciate a more visual tutorial.
...
- What was unnecessary
- I think that the pages were fine. Some of the pages that were like little comments probably weren't really necessary, but to someone else they might have been.
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
- I liked and found it very helpful, but I would have liked for it to do a very more examples.
...
--Dpboyer (talk) 06:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
... The tutorial was very straightforward and easy to follow.
- What I didn't like
... It could have been shorter and emphasized the more important points.
- What was missing
... N/A
- What was unnecessary
... Some of the comparing and contrasting of good and bad (pages to edit for example) seemed unnecessary at times.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Tgrider23 (talk) 13:15, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
-Videos; Bullet Point Lists
- What I didn't like
-Everything was great!
--Saferrin (talk) 14:13, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Dillon-robertson (talk) 14:29, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Handsanitizer123 (talk) 16:00, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--KD1004 (talk) 17:18, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Great format
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Trickwik22 (talk) 19:04, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--TasneemE (talk) 19:34, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...Very detailed and thorough tutorial.
- What I didn't like
...I'm worried I won't remember everything; such as how to bold, use the sandbox, link to articles, and other necessary "shortcuts."
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...I'm doing this for a class, so I really only needed to know how to edit an article.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--TasneemE (talk) 19:36, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--SavanahNicole (talk) 20:39, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I learned about the editing and citing aspects of wikipedia
- What I didn't like
...nothing i didn't like
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jgb343 (talk) 20:51, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
Ashley M. W.
- What I liked
...It was very straightforward and to the point
- What I didn't like
...It was a dry read
- What was missing
...Some commonly asked questions would have been nice to have
- What was unnecessary
...Everything was nescessary
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was very helpful
--Ashley M. W. 21:35, 15 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was straightforward, and the videos helped a lot.
- What I didn't like
...There was a lot of information that I know I won't be able to remember correctly.
- What was missing
...Simple practice sessions
- What was unnecessary
...Not much.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Jms457 (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Very helpful, clear, concise! Great community
- What I didn't like
Tutorial video audio would echo or lag as another audio layer underneath
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Really helpful!
--Aciurcina (talk) 09:16, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--164.107.47.208 (talk) 13:37, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
I liked the videos, and especially that they had subtitles to help with verbal comprehension.
- What I didn't like
Nothing I can think of :)
- What was missing
Again, nothing I can think of.
- What was unnecessary
Nada!
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
I liked it, it was pretty useful, taught me the basics, and since it was just a tutorial, it didn't come with the anxiety of being a first time editor on something real.
--Run desdemona (talk) 17:56, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...It was helpful and interactive
- What I didn't like
...It was long
- What was missing
...N/A
- What was unnecessary
...N/A
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...It was well done
--Elk234 (talk) 19:48, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
It gave a good introduction to the editing process and was witty enough that I didn't resent going through it
- What I didn't like
Nothing in particular
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was confusing at first and I think I went through the "bolding" step four times before I realized that I had accidentally left the module.
--MediSyntax (talk) 21:21, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
It was good
- What I liked
good training
- What I didn't like
should be more hands on
- What was missing
hands on training
- What was unnecessary
everything
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
it should be mandated --Tommyshortbeard (talk) 00:00, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...
--Theannetelope (talk) 03:31, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...
- What I didn't like
...
- What was missing
...
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
Could be broken down into more steps that teach us wikicode. I found it difficult to figure out and in the end copied/pasted the code which was not instructive enough.
--Zyvzyva (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
Videos
- What I didn't like
- What was missing
An explanation of the "Food and Drink" and "Kitten" options in the barnstar video.
- What was unnecessary
...
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
It was wonderful!!!
--Farabeeandrew (talk) 09:02, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
- What I liked
...I liked the step by step help, as well as the practice modules.
- What I didn't like
...The coding is hard to understand for somebody that has not done computer codes or Wikipedia before.
- What was missing
...One thing that was missing from the practice was what to do if your article gets flagged or ends up being taken down.
- What was unnecessary
...The only unecessary part was the beginning of the tutorial when it is explaining Wikipedia, it could have skipped to rules and editing.
- If you tried the interactive editing tutorial, what did you think of it?
...I think the interactive tutorial helped, but still not enough to fully get the grasp of how to edit.