Talk:Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
While this change has been approved, it isn't effective until March 2015, is there any way we can change the title of the page back until thenM?[[User:Chitinid|Chitinid]] ([[User talk:Chitinid|talk]]) 03:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC) |
While this change has been approved, it isn't effective until March 2015, is there any way we can change the title of the page back until thenM?[[User:Chitinid|Chitinid]] ([[User talk:Chitinid|talk]]) 03:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC) |
||
Just a thought, is it likely people will use the new name? After all, it is such a mouthful that it will probably only be used on official documents and signs.[[Special:Contributions/101.98.188.150|101.98.188.150]] ([[User talk:101.98.188.150|talk]]) 19:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 19:22, 17 November 2014
Kansas B‑class Mid‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Aviation: Airports Start‑class | |||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Wichita Dwight D. Eisenhower National Airport be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Kansas may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Wichita Mid-Continent Airport bombing attempt
Split to new article - The Wichita Mid-Continent Airport bombing attempt was a plot to destroy a major airport. Thoughts? --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:55, 14 December 2013 (UTC)
- Since there was no explosion / destruction / deaths, then it likely doesn't deserve another article. • Sbmeirow • Talk • 00:16, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps. On the other hand since there was no explosion / destruction / deaths at Wichita Mid-Continent Airport it's not clear that it should be in the article about the Airport. Perhaps a notice Terrorism_in_the_United_States#Alleged_and_proven_plots is sufficient given the current level of notability. Just a thought. Jason from nyc (talk) 02:34, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
- Reply - WP:N states "These notability guidelines only outline how suitable a topic is for its own article or list. They do not limit the content of an article or list." This can therefore be mentioned in this article. --Jax 0677 (talk) 20:04, 15 December 2013 (UTC)
Name
http://www.kansas.com/2014/02/28/3316443/eisenhower-airport-name-may-become.html • Sbmeirow • Talk • 12:00, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
While this change has been approved, it isn't effective until March 2015, is there any way we can change the title of the page back until thenM?Chitinid (talk) 03:14, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Just a thought, is it likely people will use the new name? After all, it is such a mouthful that it will probably only be used on official documents and signs.101.98.188.150 (talk) 19:22, 17 November 2014 (UTC)