Jump to content

Talk:Migos: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Assessment.
I didn't know you could comment on Wikipedia.
Line 9: Line 9:
I don't think we need the navigation link on top to [[List of Talmudic principles#Migo]]. First of all, this links to a 4-sentence section of a completely unsourced page. Second, traffic stats show it's completely useless, as the views of [[List of Talmudic principles]] over the last 60 days (443) are just 0.03% of the views of [[Migos]] (1,309,612). If we assume about 5% of the views of the list come from the hat note, that will mean 22 of the 1,309,612 visitors ( 0.00001% ) have actually used the hat note. [[User:2Flows|2Flows]] ([[User talk:2Flows|talk]]) 14:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
I don't think we need the navigation link on top to [[List of Talmudic principles#Migo]]. First of all, this links to a 4-sentence section of a completely unsourced page. Second, traffic stats show it's completely useless, as the views of [[List of Talmudic principles]] over the last 60 days (443) are just 0.03% of the views of [[Migos]] (1,309,612). If we assume about 5% of the views of the list come from the hat note, that will mean 22 of the 1,309,612 visitors ( 0.00001% ) have actually used the hat note. [[User:2Flows|2Flows]] ([[User talk:2Flows|talk]]) 14:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
:As no one opposed for a week, I'll go ahead and remove it. [[User:2Flows|2Flows]] ([[User talk:2Flows|talk]]) 17:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
:As no one opposed for a week, I'll go ahead and remove it. [[User:2Flows|2Flows]] ([[User talk:2Flows|talk]]) 17:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)



---
I just wanted to say, "... many tweeted that Quavo got his chain took." Y'all talk like me! Don't you change it either, that's exactly how you're supposed to say it.

Revision as of 19:51, 3 December 2014

We should remove the hat note

I don't think we need the navigation link on top to List of Talmudic principles#Migo. First of all, this links to a 4-sentence section of a completely unsourced page. Second, traffic stats show it's completely useless, as the views of List of Talmudic principles over the last 60 days (443) are just 0.03% of the views of Migos (1,309,612). If we assume about 5% of the views of the list come from the hat note, that will mean 22 of the 1,309,612 visitors ( 0.00001% ) have actually used the hat note. 2Flows (talk) 14:44, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As no one opposed for a week, I'll go ahead and remove it. 2Flows (talk) 17:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


--- I just wanted to say, "... many tweeted that Quavo got his chain took." Y'all talk like me! Don't you change it either, that's exactly how you're supposed to say it.