User talk:SPPO1126: Difference between revisions
→Smith & Wesson Model 4006: new section |
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
||
Line 68: | Line 68: | ||
== Smith & Wesson Model 4006 == |
== Smith & Wesson Model 4006 == |
||
Thanks for your contributions to [[Smith & Wesson Model 4006]]. It's very interesting to get that inside info on the day-to-day practices, etc.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smith_%26_Wesson_Model_4006&diff=636570512&oldid=625879464] However I'd encourage you to read The Wikipedia policy on verifiable content. [[WP:V]]. Basically, personal knowledge is not sufficient. There has to be a published source which anyone can verify. Is there any chance that this content has been covered in training manuals which you could reference? Otherwise I'm afraid it would be deleted. [[User:Rezin|Rezin]] ([[User talk:Rezin|talk]]) 23:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC) |
Thanks for your contributions to [[Smith & Wesson Model 4006]]. It's very interesting to get that inside info on the day-to-day practices, etc.[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Smith_%26_Wesson_Model_4006&diff=636570512&oldid=625879464] However I'd encourage you to read The Wikipedia policy on verifiable content. [[WP:V]]. Basically, personal knowledge is not sufficient. There has to be a published source which anyone can verify. Is there any chance that this content has been covered in training manuals which you could reference? Otherwise I'm afraid it would be deleted. [[User:Rezin|Rezin]] ([[User talk:Rezin|talk]]) 23:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC) I have manuals and letters and photos. |
||
This was my first attempt at making an e |
|||
Entery and I could not figure out how to do the footnotes or the photos any help that you could give would be greatly appreciated. Paul Olson, pjo351@yahoo.com |
Revision as of 00:09, 5 December 2014
Welcome!
|
Smith & Wesson Model 4006
Thanks for your contributions to Smith & Wesson Model 4006. It's very interesting to get that inside info on the day-to-day practices, etc.[1] However I'd encourage you to read The Wikipedia policy on verifiable content. WP:V. Basically, personal knowledge is not sufficient. There has to be a published source which anyone can verify. Is there any chance that this content has been covered in training manuals which you could reference? Otherwise I'm afraid it would be deleted. Rezin (talk) 23:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC) I have manuals and letters and photos. This was my first attempt at making an e Entery and I could not figure out how to do the footnotes or the photos any help that you could give would be greatly appreciated. Paul Olson, pjo351@yahoo.com