Talk:Brenner v. Scott: Difference between revisions
→Photo: minor edit, correcting typo; thanking Bmclaughlin9 (talk) for helping editors on both sides of this issue. :) |
→Photo: *another* minor edit, correcting typo & adding stuff in parenths; thanking Bmclaughlin9 (talk) for helping editors on both sides of this issue. :) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
::While I am an 'unregistered' editor, and thus can not upload stuff (too much arguing going on here!), I would like to thank you, [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]), for assisting in both matters: |
::While I am an 'unregistered' editor, and thus can not upload stuff (too much arguing going on here!), I would like to thank you, [[User:Bmclaughlin9|Bmclaughlin9]] ([[User talk:Bmclaughlin9|talk]]), for assisting in both matters: |
||
:: First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered |
:: First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.) |
||
::Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.[[Special:Contributions/96.59.130.176|96.59.130.176]] ([[User talk:96.59.130.176|talk]]) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC) |
::Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.[[Special:Contributions/96.59.130.176|96.59.130.176]] ([[User talk:96.59.130.176|talk]]) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:33, 6 December 2014
Law C‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
Florida Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
LGBTQ+ studies Unassessed | |||||||
|
Photo
It is requested that an edit be made to the semi-protected article at Brenner v. Scott. (edit · history · last · links · protection log)
This template must be followed by a complete and specific description of the request, that is, specify what text should be removed and a verbatim copy of the text that should replace it. "Please change X" is not acceptable and will be rejected; the request must be of the form "please change X to Y".
The edit may be made by any autoconfirmed user. Remember to change the |
Those of us in the Brenner v Scott now Armstrong case would like to ask that the photo located on the web site of the Jax paper be used on this site. This photo was taken BY the plaintiffs and supplied to our attys to be used by the press. We have others that can also be used if you do not want to use the one from the Times Union.
http://jacksonville.com/news/florida/2014-12-03/story/gay-marriage-could-be-real-many-jan-6-barring-supreme-court-action
- The owner of the photo should add it to Wikipedia's resources. The process may look complicated, but it's not hard to figure out. Working on a computer where you have a copy of the image, start here and use the Upload Wizard. Then give us a link to the file here. Bmclaughlin9 (talk) 04:12, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- While I am an 'unregistered' editor, and thus can not upload stuff (too much arguing going on here!), I would like to thank you, Bmclaughlin9 (talk), for assisting in both matters:
- First, the plaintiffs, apparently, are also unregistered editors and can not upload stuff, so thank you for stepping up to the plate and going to bat. (I say this with no conflict of interest: While I oppose any and all mistreatment of gays, I do not support a definition of marriage to include anything other than 'traditional' marriage, but, again, the plaintiffs here should be made to feel welcome and helped out with their upload issues.)
- Secondly, I see you were a fair player and placed that one resource link (for selected case data downloads) in a proper place. While I had erroneously placed it in probably a less than optimal place, I did to improve your article here, and I am glad that you helped work out a compromise that works for all.96.59.130.176 (talk) 05:28, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
- C-Class law articles
- Low-importance law articles
- WikiProject Law articles
- Unassessed Florida articles
- Unknown-importance Florida articles
- WikiProject Florida articles
- Unassessed LGBTQ+ studies articles
- WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies articles
- Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests
- Wikipedia edit requests possibly using incorrect templates