Talk:United States Senate Republican primary election in Mississippi, 2014: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 04:00, 8 January 2015

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the United States Senate Republican primary election in Mississippi, 2014 redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

United States

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
	This redirect has been marked as needing immediate attention.

U.S. Congress

	United States portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject U.S. Congress, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States Congress on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.U.S. CongressWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. CongressTemplate:WikiProject U.S. CongressU.S. Congress articles
	This redirect is about one (or many) events(s).

Politics

	Politics portal This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
	This redirect has been marked as needing immediate attention.

Conservatism

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism articles

Elections and Referendums

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Elections and Referendums, an ongoing effort to improve the quality of, expand upon and create new articles relating to elections, electoral reform and other aspects of democratic decision-making. For more information, visit our project page.Elections and ReferendumsWikipedia:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsTemplate:WikiProject Elections and ReferendumsElections and Referendums articles

Tea Party POV

This article has a heavy Tea Party POV, particularly in the Race Card scandal section. In that section, there's no argument on behalf of Cochran's campaign or the "establishment," except for an alleged argument from Barbour that's quickly "discredited" in the next section. Hence, I'm adding a POV tag to the page. Orser67 (talk) 10:07, 11 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Who would be the most appropriate member of the Republican Establishment to present an argument for the other side here? 64.134.180.210 (talk) 22:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Racist advertising

There is a strong urge on part of some to wish that racist ads weren't used in the primary, and thus, to expunge any verifiable information about it from the article. Be it funding trail, places where the actual advertisements can be viewed, or otherwise. It seems readily apparent that the first thing said editors are going to need to do is make their case that "food stamps" is not racist in the context. If that is the case, perhaps you will be re-writing(removing) half of the content on several of Wikipedia's other pages that delve into this similar theme. If so, this will be the first time that "food stamps" is not racist(in the context) in decades.

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Who would be the most appropriate member of the [[Republican Establishment]] to present an argument for the other side here?
 [[Special:Contributions/64.134.180.210|64.134.180.210]] ([[User talk:64.134.180.210|talk]]) 22:30, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
+==Racist advertising==
+There is a strong urge on part of some to wish that racist ads weren't used in the primary, and thus, to expunge any verifiable information about it from the article.  Be it funding trail, places where the actual advertisements can be viewed, or otherwise.
+It seems readily apparent that the first thing said editors are going to need to do is make their case that "food stamps" is not racist in the context.  If that is the case, perhaps you will be re-writing(removing) half of the content on several of Wikipedia's other pages that delve into this similar theme.  If so, this will be the first time that "food stamps" is not racist(in the context) in decades.