User talk:Lightning Sabre: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 09:30, 28 March 2015

Welcome!

Hello, Lightning Sabre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Dai Pritchard (talk) 13:36, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Lightning Sabre. You have new messages at Dai Pritchard's talk page.
Message added 14:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dai Pritchard (talk) 14:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted images

Please do not upload or place images that you found on the Internet into articles. They are clearly not "own work" and you will be blocked if you misattribute copyrighted images in this manner again. Acroterion (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Acroterion, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocking

I have blocked the Kind Dude account as an obvious sockpuppet. I've only blocked this accoutn for 48 hours, but if this account resumes its disruptive behavior after the block expires, it will be blocked indefinitely.

You can't upload copyrighted images and claim them as your own
You must obtain consensus for changes
You can't pretend to be other users
You need to read and understand material before you change it, i.e. the Mahirin edits where you treated a fighter wing and a fighter group as the same organization.
You must treat other editors with respect

Please reconsider your approach to editing the encyclopedia. Acroterion (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lightning_Sabre reported by User:Veggies (Result: ). Thank you. Veggies (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove any reports against you. Like you did here at ANEW. Thanks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Murry1975 (talk) 08:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Lightning Sabre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked because of disruptive editing which I did not know about as I was using wikipedia for the first time.So,give me a last chance and I will improve my behavior with users and work together with them.So,unblock me and give me a chance.

Notes:

In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=I was blocked because of disruptive editing which I did not know about as I was using wikipedia for the first time.So,give me a last chance and I will improve my behavior with users and work together with them.So,unblock me and give me a chance. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked because of disruptive editing which I did not know about as I was using wikipedia for the first time.So,give me a last chance and I will improve my behavior with users and work together with them.So,unblock me and give me a chance. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=I was blocked because of disruptive editing which I did not know about as I was using wikipedia for the first time.So,give me a last chance and I will improve my behavior with users and work together with them.So,unblock me and give me a chance. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

You were given a second chance already, when you were given only a 48 hour block and asked - very politely - to discontinue your disruptive editing. But, you decided to not listen, and continued your pattern of disruption. So, what's to lead me to believe that you won't continue that pattern of editing once unblocked. now? — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

To Coffee // have a cup // beans

If i do it again you can block me and i won't appeal for it.I promise I will learn about wikipedia before I edit anything and I won't violate any rules again I promise.Give me a last chance for me to improve.

Regards, Lightning Sabre

@@ Line 53: / Line 53: @@
 ==March 2015==
-To [User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a cup</font>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]]
+To [[User:Coffee|<big style="color:#ffa439">Coffee</big>]] // [[user talk:Coffee|<font color="#009900">have a cup</font>]] // [[Special:Contributions/Coffee|<font color="#4682b4">beans</font>]]
 If i do it again you can block me and i won't appeal for it.I promise I will learn about wikipedia before I edit anything and I won't violate any rules again I promise.Give me a last chance for me to improve.