User talk:Dai Pritchard

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Wikipedia-logo BW-hires.svg This editor has decided to leave Wikipedia.

Disambiguation link notification for May 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Non-specific effect of vaccines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mortality (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

Decision to leave[edit]

Hey Dai Pritchard, I have to say that looking at this page and finding that you've decided to leave Wikipedia permanently caught me by surprise, and I really do think it's a shame, I definitely value your contributions. I can't count the amount of times that you've beaten me to nominating something for speedy deletion. I guess I'll leave this here in case you ever check back, and I really do think you should reconsider, although I can understand if you've left for personal reasons. Regards, Pishcal 04:47, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Whispering sands golf club[edit]

Yes, I am offended by your deleting what I had started to write, IT IS AN Encyclopedia - My page was still being edited, I don't have a lot of time to spend writing, if anything I write can be deleted without inquiry as to what the subject matter is about, based upon one individual's limited perspective - then perhaps that is the problem with wikipedia being filled with inaccurate information on many topics. I was giving basic information about Golf club which is normally being done by other golf clubs, however because you "jumped-the-gun" and deleted what I had started without inquiry or directive regarding the information - now I don't have a copy of what was on the page. Thanks for nothing - I will probably not use or contribute nor donate to wikipedia anymore because your "judgmental approach to editing" without first making some type of inquiry is (for lack of time and better terminology) totalitarian, prejudicial in perspective, unwarranted without some type of precursor. To my recollection, an encyclopedia is "a book, set of books, and/or an established media-oriented conduit that enables the free access to information utilized in various formats pertaining to (yet not necessarily limited to) historic, scientific, culture, economic, religious, social and sports context. My page was not being designed to function in anyway that would violate or interfere with the statement: "Although a lot of leeway is allowed in personalizing your user page, it is not a personal website, blog, or social networking medium, nor should it be used to promote myself, or host a fake article, CV, or lengthy biography. My statements, that you deleted, are articles, including historical fact, and biographic information; Not to create a blog, or to a "fake-alias" - if all my content can be deleted before I finish then that should have been stated when I signed-on, having material deleted by someone who just assumes the page is somehow not valid based on personal prejudice and/or incomplete comprehension of what and how something is being presented. Thanks. — Jan2366 (talk) 9:32, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

NOTE: The above was not written by Jan2366. It was copy pasted from my talk page, originally written by User:Datrufth. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Bhagawati Prakash Sharma for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bhagawati Prakash Sharma is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bhagawati Prakash Sharma until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Itsalleasy (talk) 17:19, 21 May 2015 (UTC)