Talk:List of social networking services: Difference between revisions
m Archiving 4 discussion(s) to Talk:List of social networking websites/Archive 8) (bot |
|||
Line 59: | Line 59: | ||
{{Warning|If you are requesting a social networking site be added to the list, please note that sites will only be added after an article has been created on the site. For information on how to create an article, please see [[Wikipedia:Starting an article]].}} |
{{Warning|If you are requesting a social networking site be added to the list, please note that sites will only be added after an article has been created on the site. For information on how to create an article, please see [[Wikipedia:Starting an article]].}} |
||
== Social networking websites missing from the article == |
|||
It appers Seen.is hasn't been listed? --[[Special:Contributions/62.16.186.44|62.16.186.44]] ([[User talk:62.16.186.44|talk]]) 20:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:07, 5 April 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of social networking services article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9Auto-archiving period: 45 days ![]() |
![]() | Websites: Computing List‑class High‑importance | ||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:
|
|
|||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 45 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Semi-protected edit request on 4 February 2014
|- ! Poolwo | Social networking site from India | 7 January 2014 | 9,113[1] | Open | 311,170[2] |-
References
- ^ poolwo.com
- ^ poolwo.com Site Info Alexa. Retrieved 4 February 2014.
Why isin't Usenet included in this list?
It's a total crock that usenet is not included in this list. Usenet was the original "social network" on the internet, and it continues to be the only communications mechanism and method for allowing people to aggregate in "societies" and communicate with each other without corporate or government influence or censorship. Usenet is the only social network that can garantee anonymity for those that seek it.
For this wikipedia list of social networks to have even a shred of credibility, authority and completeness, Usenet must be included. The fact that this is a list of "websites" is irrelavent, because the vast majority of people do not experience any of these social networks via web-browser. This list needs to be renamed as a list of internet-based social networks, and Usenet must be added and mentioned as the original internet social network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.91.158.197 (talk) 23:20, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- While I agree with you that Usenet should probably be included, please note that making statements like "total crock", "needs to be" and "must be" is not the usual, and a rarely effective, means of developing consensus on Wikipedia, which is one of the core principles by which this site works. Dwpaul Talk 23:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
- The list is social networking websites. Usenet is not a website. --— Rhododendrites talk \\ 14:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
It was already pointed out in this section that catagorizing social networks that exist on or are reachable through the internet in terms of whether those networks exist as websites is questionable or serves no purpose other than to exclude obvious examples of social networks such as usenet. I suggest that some action be taken to remove the unnecessary critea of "website" be removed from this article and the article be renamed as a "List of Internet-based Social Networks", and usenet be included as the defacto original internet social network. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.93.26.3 (talk) 15:05, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
Social Network to be added
Can somebody add www.carii.com to this list of social networking sites? thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnpalmerjp3 (talk • contribs) 01:16, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
- Johnpalmerjp3 is there a Wikipedia article for this social network? Quickly looking I do not see one. The consensus here is that we only add entries after an article has been created. -- GB fan 01:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
Doximity request
![]() | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please Add Doximity 1. It has a wikipedia article."Launched in March 2011, Doximity has over 400,000 verified physician members as of December 2015. " — Preceding unsigned comment added by BSatDrSocial (talk • contribs) 22:48, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
- "http://drsocial.org, http://www.medstro.com" were also in edit summary. Origamiteⓣⓒ 22:46, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
Done Stickee (talk) 01:06, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
Reminder
![]() | If you are requesting a social networking site be added to the list, please note that sites will only be added after an article has been created on the site. For information on how to create an article, please see Wikipedia:Starting an article. |
Social networking websites missing from the article
It appers Seen.is hasn't been listed? --62.16.186.44 (talk) 20:07, 5 April 2015 (UTC)