User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom

HURRY, HURRY, HURRY!

Step right up and see a treasury of pinnipeds right before your very eyes!

The next act in only 4 days and 10 edits.

The most ethical show in the big top!

And there is also This archive.

Please note that the Presidency University, Kolkata page has been vandalised

Please correct / delete unreferenced comments such as 'Hence all corruptions are tucked away under the cupboard.[3]' The citations are to blogs hosted by specific individuals / interest groups.

!!!!

my edit contributions

I never heard of Paula Broadwell, but for being in the news for stalking and being the CIA mistress nontheless, she (and every living subject) all have their wiki begin with their careers, past and present. In fact, i beleive hers even begind with something like former military officer, academic, and writer. therefore to be consistent, and most appropiate, a subject opens with their career/former appointments, follwed by the action that put them in the news. thank you for understanding my consistency and contribution of my edit — Preceding unsigned comment added by Baumblor (talk • contribs) 15:58, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

@Baumblor: Your assumption is incorrect - see WP:LEADSENTENCE. Kelley is not notable for her honorary positions. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:18, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

To use an obvious example, have a look at J. K. Rowling. Nothing in the lead sentence about her Amnesty International work or teaching career. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:31, 24 March 2015 (UTC)

Ten edits to get confirmed, and then a revert. Hmmm. [1] --NeilN ^{talk to me} 16:51, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

FYI, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Harvardclub --NeilN ^{talk to me} 17:09, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

thanks for revision

hello. i am adding the link for aham sharma page now. thank you for revising. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feniks105 (talk • contribs) 12:35, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

hello Sir.  i just found the reliable source. please give me a moment.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by Feniks105 (talk • contribs) 13:19, 2 April 2015 (UTC) 

Unknown expression

What does "bumpkiss is not given primacy" mean, please? Skeptic2 (talk) 01:03, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for your explanation of this new (to me) word. We do not disagree about the need to be skeptical of this case. but your edits have removed useful (and skeptical) information and references. Your blanket reversions appear high-handed. Please don't start an edit war on this. Another user has already chastised you for acting as though you own the page and your response was to threaten to block them, which rather confirms the point. I have been working for years to keep the loonies out of this entry, so we are working to the same ends. Please try to find some merit in the edits of others. I would appreciate your support rather than endless conflict. That's how to lose friends. Skeptic2 (talk) 01:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Are you sure the word isn't really "bubkes"? And, whatever the word, it isn't "given primacy" if you bother to read my edits rather than blindly reverting. Skeptic2 (talk) 01:45, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Why are you now deleting skeptical sources as "unreliable"? I have spent considerable time fixing your string of botched edits and now you are undoing good work. What is your agenda? Skeptic2 (talk) 02:05, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Seems to me that you are now leaving glaring gaps in what was a much-improved article. I share the opinion of User 80.201.60.73 on your ability. Skeptic2 (talk) 02:40, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Rohit Kapuria

The user Rohit Kapuria keeps on removing aFD tags and is now saying "you will be blocked if you continue to send them to me (which he is up for a spi anyway), but yeah this is getting crazy. Wgolf (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2015 (UTC) I've added many of the pages that keep on getting reverted here: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vamsiraj also check out the edits by the IP as there are even more! Wgolf (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Malayalam cinema

You have made four reverts to the Malayalam cinema within 5 hours. We have a bright line regarding such behaviour outlined at WP:3RRNO, which is that a user who reverts three times in 24 hours is blocked to prevent them from reverting again. You need to explain the rationale behind your actions on the talkpage of the article. You may have a valid point, but that point is going to get lost in an edit war. Under the guidance essay WP:BRD, when someone sees something in an article they disagree with, they may be Bold and change it. If someone comes along and Reverts them, they don't get into an edit war, they go to the talkpage and Discuss the reason for their edit. That's what you need to do right now. Be aware, if I see any more editing warring on that article I may lock down the article in whichever version I come upon, and/or block those involved without any further warning. SilkTork ^{✔Tea time} 19:06, 3 April 2015 (UTC)

Help

A RS states "Drushyam has been made with a with a medium budget of Rs 6 crores and producer Suresh Babu has reportedly shelled out around Rs 3-4 crores on its promotions". What should be the budget written in the info box? 6 crores or 10 crores appx? Please clarify! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 15:04, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

Metro Shoes

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 19:55, 9 April 2015 (UTC)

Hello there! Agreed, Wikipedia is written by people who have wide diversity of opinions, and we try hard to ensure articles have a neutral point of view. Wonder whats wrong with the neutrality of the version that I have worked on. They are real facts. Am fine for you to add your portion of the text, but I disagree you deleting the content I have added on to it. Your version and mine are facts and numbers well supported. Jimmy.Karumalil (talk)

Hi There, in that case, can you please help update 2015 data? I think reference to 2013 article is too outdated.Jimmy.karumalil (talk) 08:00, 10 April 2015 (UTC)

S/O Satyamurthy

Can you please explain me how it was an original research? I actually in the note cited reliable sources in neutral tone and the facts were not my opinion? Pavanjandhyala (talk) 04:41, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Then suggest me what to do? But you never did it in any of the past situations. One thing is sure, what i'm trying to say is not false and when a rule prevents me from improving or maintaining an article's reliability, i can surely ignore it. I learnt it from you Pen, don't deny it! Pavanjandhyala (talk) 05:32, 11 April 2015 (UTC)

Please don't redirect Reporters (Indian TV series)

This is to let you know that your recent edit to Reporters (Indian TV series) has been reverted to the last revision. In your edit summary, you explained that the show is not notable. But let me tell you that the show is notable and will be premiered tomorrow, I.e., 13 April 2015. If you think that this is not true, then you can check the news about the show on Google. As the show is about to premiere, lots of people can search the article on Wikipedia. I hope you won't redirect the article again. 182.69.69.55 (talk) 04:11, 12 April 2015 (UTC)

i am carrying edit to the page by personal discusions with Mishti Chakravarty.

hello friend plz guide me....where am i wrong... i am in contact with Mishti Chakravarty ... i am ediiting the text according to her directions....plz allow me to edit .. and dont re-edit the text till tommorow morning...Allow Mishti Mam to view this plz.....